My desperate efforts to educate the Village Idiots on site are rarely successful

It has been months now that I have been pointing out that Andre esterhuizen is a problem in the Sharks backline causing the whole backline to become ineffective.   The village idiots insisted that I was wrong and that Esterhuizen should eb in the Springbok team.  

Last week after the loss against the Stormers Du Preez said he was going to make changes to the team to make it more effective and insofar as the backline is concerned the only real change made was to put Esterhuizen on the bench.

The Village Idiots will scream blue murder - but one wonders how long it will take for Du Preez to give Esterhuizen the boot permanently as he is the sabotage factor in the Sharks backline.  

Now it is time for the Village Idiots to congratulate me on being the real rugby performance analyst on site and toa dmit that they can learn a lot listening to me. LOL         

You might have heard of this one...

Charity begins at home.

"I have been pointing out"

No you haven't. That's where your argument begins and ends. As per Ward? We'll see. I have been the only person to point him out thus far, and said he was very effective on attack for the Sharks last week. You on the other hand rated Damian the 12 of round 3, only to back-peddle when I posted the stats and praised Sage, missing Ward entirely. Better luck next time old chap. 

No Silly Billy

It was I who pointed out that Ward was an improvement on Andre Esterhuizen and said so clearly, while you went on your normal idiocy again/

I watched all the games again and that is why I gave Sage a slight edge over De Allende. It really was a toss-up between those two.  

You still have not admitted that your weekly praise singing about Esterhuizenn was a balls-up.  How long will I have to wait for that?  LOL

Damian produced the least of all the 12s on the weekend, but it's a toss up between him and Sage, whilst Ward - who outplayed both - isn't in discussion for 12 of round 3, yet he is your big find. Sure.  

My assessment of André has always been accurate. After the shame you brought on yourself lauding Damian as the best 12, for no reason whatsoever , one would have thought you'd have the good sense to be a little quieter this weak. This post is nothing but desperation on your part. My advice: Save yourself the trouble.

We need to specify the criteria for what constitutes a start Cera, as Lügnerin appears to be working from a different criteria. 

The two idiots of note has not learnt anything by now -  some people never learn.   But then to learn they need a brain and there is a clear indication that their brains are cruelly malfunctioning. 

Yep. Just as expected. There he goes again. 

Fealing guilty Ceradunce?  

I think it's time to relieve Mike of his duties.

Fealing guilty Ceradunce? ”

Nope. What about you? Feeling stupid? ........again still.

Fixed

Ok ... so Ward is an improvement on Estie ... Poepol seems to agree with you on that, Mike ... so what's the argument about?

Who spotted Ward first?

Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaaaa!!

Like little children squabbling over a toffee.

Hang on a bit ... Poepol told us that Estie was the best 12 in the country ... that he was in fact the best 12 on the planet ... and ... well ... umm ... he seems to have changed his mind now.

Clueless as always.

So tell me doos, when can we expect your match 23 ... and who will be at 12 ... Estie or Ward ... or ... Pollard?

Oh ... could have sworn I read somewhere where you were giving us the rundown on all his wonderful tributes.

He's a this and a that ... a must have for the coming WC ... blah, blah, blah ... so deceptively quick ... and so wonderfully strong ... how he's able to get his outside man into space ... a wonderful reader of the game ... incredible defender ... amazing distributor ... able to gel with Am like they were of one mind ... and so forth ... was that not you?

What changed your mind ... him being dropped to the bench because of exceedingly poor play, perhaps?

Feeling like a doos aren't we ... ?

So ... w hen can we expect your match 23, Doos.

Ex The Sharks website:

"Cell C Sharks Head Coach Robert du Preez has hinted at making rotational changes during the season and after three Vodacom Super Rugby matches, has re-arranged his side to take on the Vodacom Bulls."

Confirmed by the interview with the coach on Supersport:

"There is a rotational change at inside centre, where Jeremy Ward moves to the starting team and Springbok centre Andre Esterhuizen moves into Ward’s place on the bench. There is also what could be considered a tactical change and shift of position in the second row."

“All the changes that have been made have been because of niggles or they are rotational changes. Andre (Esterhuizen) is just getting a bit of a break by starting this game from the bench, which at the same time rewards Jeremy Ward for the hard work he has put in this season."

Listing his attributes does not equate to him being the best 12 on the planet. You always get flustered and ahead of yourself Herr Albi. I haven't changed my mind about him, and I never rated his performance as poor either. I still believe no other 12 in the country suits the Bok game better than him. As I said about Ward, we'll see. 30 or so minutes isn't enough to determine anything, especially as the Sharks had much more front foot ball to work with as the game opened up. If you think any of the attributes I have ascribed to André are incorrect, you are free to show me where this is so. If you have a better alternative, show me. Though you'll have to do better than "the goat of goats" De Allende. 

Silly Billy and Sillier akie

When making rotational changes - why change the player you identified the best center in SA?

Esterhuizen and Bosch both buggered up badly in the game against the Stormers and that is why the two were benched,   And you kept on screaming hysterically on the site that Esterhuizen was deserving of  being the no 12 when I posted a suggested team for Round 3 originally.   

Pakie emphasized the story about the rotational changes but as per normal is too stupid to realize what actually happened,   After the loss to the Stormers Du Preez was clearly miffed by the performance of some players and said that there will be changes made to the team..   Under the circumstances  it is clear that Du Preez tended to make changes based on performance deficiency in the game against the Stormers,   The rotation  story is flouted to protect the image of the players involved from too much public criticism. 

It is abundantly clear that in there postings on his site has been so looney that one can only laugh at them and now the Village idiots are trying to deny hat they wrote about descrinthe center issue for more than a year,  Pathetic is the only word that really describe their sdilly shenanigans.   SO HAPPY IDIOTD FAY TO YOU,   

Silly Billy and Sillier akie

When making rotational changes - why change the player you identified the best center in SA?

Esterhuizen and Bosch both buggered up badly in the game against the Stormers and that is why the two were benched,   And you kept on screaming hysterically on the site that Esterhuizen was deserving of  being the no 12 when I posted a suggested team for Round 3 originally.   

Pakie emphasized the story about the rotational changes but as per normal is too stupid to realize what actually happened,   After the loss to the Stormers Du Preez was clearly miffed by the performance of some players and said that there will be changes made to the team..   Under the circumstances  it is clear that Du Preez tended to make changes based on performance deficiency in the game against the Stormers,   The rotation  story is flouted to protect the image of the players involved from too much public criticism. 

It is abundantly clear that in there postings on his site has been so looney that one can only laugh at them and now the Village idiots are trying to deny hat they wrote about descrinthe center issue for more than a year,  Pathetic is the only word that really describe their sdilly shenanigans.   SO HAPPY IDIOTD FAY TO YOU,   

Oh the drama

You have a bad habit of surmising what a coach is thinking. It's led to considerable problems for you. Stop reading between the lines and keep to the facts. If you can't find facts to support your belief, then bite your tongue.

As for André's performance, you haven't provided any evidence to support your claims. You took the intercept - from a phase of play you couldn't interpret - and weaved a fanciful tall tale out of thin air. So much for Damian playing the fool with André, only for André to rush up off a lineout and force Damian to panic and fling it wide early. What were Damian's contributions in the first 60 minutes? Nothing. 

How the Village Idiots are squirming - I should let  up a bit now - they cannot help being ugby illiterates.  Best advice one has to learn about the game before writing tripe on site. 

How many ball turnovers in breakdown play did De Allende made on Saturday and  how about the kick that forced Bosch to run out and led to a Stormers throw-in  in the lineout five meters out/  You never saw that did you.

But you are always manufacturing fairy tales like the following:-

"... only for André to rush up off a lineout and force Damian to panic and fling it wide early"

No - you are indeed too stupid to discuss rugby issues, especially when it comes to surmising as you wrote above. .    

So by the way, Robert du Preez already hinted at rotational changes after three games in January:

With no international break this year because of the World Cup‚ squad usage has to be very good and byes have to be used strategically.

“We didn’t rotate as much as we should have last year. We’ve got such a strong squad and we shouldn’t be scared to rotate after three games.

“Look at the talent we have at scrumhalf but there’ll be a fair bit of rotation. Guys‚ though‚ must slot in and perform‚” Du Preez said.

The wriggly wee wirm panics as his thread sinks beneath the waves, however, not before Captain Lügnerin himself spits his dummy one last time. 

Pakie

Grow up - I refer to the post - game interview where Du Preez was clearly annoyed about the performance of some players.    It is obvious that he would change the worst offenders of which Esterhuizen and  Bosch were the first to deal with .   

Rotation is often the word used to protect under=performing players from public criticism.      

So in other words, according to you, this:

Du Preez also said he’ll rotate his squad much better this season as compared to last year.

Should actually read:

Du Preez also said he'll protect under-performing players from public criticism much better this season as compared to last year.

Pakie - stop making assumptions - you must learn about life and start to understand things.  If I were you and that Silly Billy fellow I would keep quiet and try and run away from the embarrassment you and him have caused in the past.  

I am not making assumptions. I am quoting the coach.

Go and see the quote you made under the thread dealing with Swys and then  answer the simple question I asked you there - where you also quoted the coach.

Now run off and go and hide in the dunce corner. /  

Mike, I can't take the cringe any longer. Please, I implore you, stay down! 

Silly Billy

From what Idiot?  Your idiocy has brought on this thread and if I were you I would run like hell away from such an embarrassment.

Silly Billy

From what Idiot?  Your idiocy has brought on this thread and if I were you I would run like hell away from such an embarrassment.

Chipou, don't you worry about Oom Mike...and I think you are projecting  your pump into a strap on for him.

BTW, why would a coach "rotate/rest" one of his best players in a tough away match, against the high flying Bools, if his team has a bye the following week anyway?

Maybe Maaik has a point?

Du Preez explains all the selections in this article, Draad. He is also resting his best lock and starting with two newbies in those positions.

Believe it or not - two if the players he put in the bench made serious blunders that caused the loss by the Sharks.   That is why Pakie is so desperate to sideline the discussion.   Du Preez will not wash the dirty linen in public - so suddenly rotation is the discussion topic./ 

Here is your problem Mike: You are assuming that the coach is punishing André. You said it's a fact. It is not a fact. None of us know what is going on in his head. Maybe he was genuinely impressed with Ward and wants to see how he does before their bye against a strong opponent. Who knows. As I say, we'll see how it goes. You always fall back on immature knee-jerk emotional outbursts, which always leads you to failure. Learn from this thread. How old are you? It's sad that I have to be saying this to someone nearly three times my age. Very sad.