This is again BS. The Supreme Court ruled that the Justice Department as to refame charge the Court egard ss Uncositutional and not in line with reality so the question remain - is his Jusice rying o overule ahat he Supeme Court ruled a s hecarges laid and the 4 yer delay in brig in g chages is in ac abuse of he Rule of Law.
What the Deparment of Jusitce has done and is doing is DESPICA BLE and indeed SIES. You should realize what is happening in he USA by he Justice Department in the present sceanrio.. Keeping people in jail for 4 years ars is total dictatorial BS to be expeced from he Gestapo and Stalinist KGB.
To threaten the arrested people that they will be kept in jail unil hey plead guily to charges the Supreme Court is BS keep them in jail until they admit guilt to charges the SC regard a preposterous is unacceptable roma legal perspective.
How about stirring up murder of Trump nominees allowed to flourish by the Justice deparment which is 10 time worse than what acually happened on 6 January and you apparently support such conduct - why don't you call political murder threats SIES as well.
In any event thee is a rule of what saying Jstice delayed reprsents Justice denial and keeping people in jail wihout charges for four years represent Justice denial. SIES AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Are you supporting MURDER
OF POLITICAL OPPONENTS what the Democras are doing by promoting murder of political opponents in the USA . YES or NO?.
Denny
Hall Of Fame
11011 posts
U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth declined this week to postpone the trials of Richard Slaughter and Caden Paul Gottfried in light of president-elect Donald Trump's vow to pardon Jan. 6 rioters.
Gottfried and Slaughter, his stepfather, were observed engaging law enforcement in an area known as "the tunnel" on Jan. 6, 2021.
"We don't leave," Slaughter reportedly said in one interview recorded that day. "We stay united, and we take back our country."
Following the November election, the two men asked the court to postpone their trials because Trump had made campaign promises about providing pardons to U.S. Capitol rioters, but in a five-page ruling on Wednesday, Lamberth denied the request.
"[T]he Department has not, in fact, adopted an official agency policy of halting any and all matters related to the Capitol Riots," Lamberth wrote.
According to the judge, special counsel Jack Smith's decision to drop prosecutions against Trump for election subversion also "bear no resemblance to the case against Mr. Slaughter and Mr. Gottfried."
"This Court recently had the occasion to discuss what effect the speculative possibility of a presidential pardon has on the timetable for a pending criminal matter. In short: little to none," the ruling continued. "The defendants ask this Court to do something extraordinary: to defray the execution of its own constitutional duties."
Lamberth also addressed the assertion that going forward with trials would waste resources.
"The defendants' implicit efforts to caricature the timely pursuit of truth as a mere 'expedien[t],' and to recast the defendants as the hapless victims of arbitrary government action, are a preposterous mischaracterization of our justice system," he explained.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
As expected the classless and wealthy hillbilly President elect will pardon the deplorables who in their criminal behaviour reduced a nation to gutter level in the face of a live international audience.
Sies!