Dnny can I give you n example why a lot of Gnerals deserve to be fired. In the chaotic disaser i Afghanistan wiothdrawals the US General in charge at Kabul airpport tried to instruct the English army unit geting citizenss and vulerable Afgans ou safely - the ent army unt o fetch people nad big them to the airport.for evacation/ Ehen the US Geneal tried to stop them from sending units to collect vulnerae people they wanted out - he US General gave the Taliban a list of people they want to evacuate and it si till this day not clear how many f hose people were killed by te Taliban.
In any event the Taliban asked the US General to sto the evcuation of the UK Trops endig people intoHKabul to collect people they wand to evcuate - the General tried to instruct the UK oficer toa dhere to the Taliban instrucion to him - it is recorded that the UK Major told him he was a a "bastard" nd the UK Colonel told the US General to "fuck off". A recorded video of wathappened exist.
When General Milley who resigned recently because he would be charged with high treason admitted that he was in regular cotact with the General in charge of the Chinese army and excahnge inormation with him - he should have been charged with High Treason and he still may be under threat of arrest. The explicit reason why ey undmined the US army and refused o carry ut orders to them by Trump was Trumps effort to end the never-ending wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The US generls in charge ws corrupt and helped along by the act that the budgt of he Defense Deaprtment has not been audied since 2003 and they were behind hat one sice the system under the became 100% corrupt.
By he ay hey are running he Ukraine rmy and the results were and are the disaster in the making in Ukraine. The latest news is theya re ploting to refsue orders given to them by the President - which also amount to High Treason and they will sufer for it.
The oter system they implment ed in trying to aly down quptas o recuiting of soldiers failed miserably So ther idiocy of recruiting illegl migrants t serve in the S army and awaded them with insant US cotozenship was raised bythem and accpted by the US Senate . The soon wil ave a US Army with 100 000 criminals and terrorists to attack the USA fom within if that idiocy is implemented. There bigest supporter in that is to be expected is Senator Durbin of Illinois/
Generals and all offices should obey lawful orders give to th em y their Commander in Chief - t he elected US President - and if they refuse to do that they deserve to be court-marshatalled and sent to jail for life or ay be better still ace a firing squad.
Unde rhe present Gnerals the S Army has become the laughing stocck of the world adthe US Army has ben weakned beyongd believe. They would not eb able to occupy Namibia and will be defeated rying to do that. So get rid of te incmpetent politicized bastards is the bsst way to go.
.
Denny
Hall Of Fame
11011 posts
Despite winning the election just a week ago, President-elect Donald Trump and his transition team aren't wasting any time preparing to staff the federal government — and the military in particular – with diehard loyalists.
The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that the Trump transition team is currently preparing an executive order that would allow him to pave the way for new military leadership that is squarely in the MAGA camp. The draft order would create a so-called "warrior board" made up of retired senior U.S. military personnel who would recommend the firing of generals and admirals who are "lacking in requisite leadership qualities."
The Journal's Vivian Salama, Lara Seligman and Nancy A. Youssef wrote that while the commander in chief can technically already fire any military official, his new warrior board could "create a chilling effect on top military officers, given the president-elect’s past vow to fire 'woke generals,' referring to officers seen as promoting diversity in the ranks at the expense of military readiness."
READ MORE: Trump told top aides he wanted the same kind of 'totally loyal' generals 'that Hitler had'
According to the paper, the draft order would establish credentials for new military leaders based on "leadership capability, strategic readiness and commitment to military excellence." But the finer details of how the board plans to evaluate candidates for military leadership based on those criteria have not been revealed. One legal expert posited that this is merely cover for Trump to appoint generals based on how loyal they would be to both his political agenda and him personally.
"This looks like an administration getting ready to purge anyone who will not be a yes man,” former U.S. Army lawyer Eric Carpenter, who teaches military law at Florida International University's College of Law, told the Journal. “If you are looking to fire officers who might say no because of the law or their ethics, you set up a system with completely arbitrary standards, so you can fire anyone you want.”
The draft order also appears to mirror what Marquette University professor Risa Brooks warned about in an article for the Council on Foreign Relations' Foreign Affairs publication earlier this year. She wrote in March that "politicians may seek to impose ideological litmus tests in promotions and appointments of senior officers," and that "the result would be profound damage to national security."
"Today, military leaders strive to be impartial in offering advice to the president, lawmakers, and other civilian officials about the use of force. In the future, they may instead tailor their recommendations to the interests of their preferred political party," she wrote. "Apart from undermining the rigor of the advisory process, such internal politicization would erode the overall unity of the military as partisan tensions spread through the ranks. And the American people’s trust in the military would decline as they came to see it as just another politicized institution, as many already see the Supreme Court."
READ MORE: 'Fascist to the core': Trump's top general slams ex-president as 'most dangerous person'
The executive order is also squarely in line with what Trump previously communicated to then-chief of staff John Kelly, a four-star Marine general who was his longest-serving chief of staff, according to an interview he gave to the Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg in October. In 2018, Trump told Kelly that he wanted the same kind of generals "that Hitler had," because they were "totally loyal."
Trump also had a tense relationship with Gen. Mark Milley, whom he appointed as chairman to the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 2019, putting him in charge of the entire U.S. military. Milley told journalist Bob Woodward that Trump was "fascist to the core," and "the most dangerous person in America." Should Trump sign the executive order creating the "warrior board," it's unlikely he'll have any top military brass who are out of step with him politically for the next four years.