I could not pen th e adrticle in full _ and could not fond the reasosn why Trump posing the biggest threat to the world in 2024. So you tell. us why he is such a big threat and to whom.
Trump alwaqys tried to prevent wars througvh negotiation - that was proven in the past - Trump believes in a balanced budget and not limnitless spending - so why is that wrong? \
He is not a racist or a person with dictatorial ambitions. He differs from Biden in that regard - he never used the Justice Department or FBI to sspy on people atnending school board meetings or colluded with the press as to what may be published and what not.
So tell us why he is the biggest threat the world is facing in 2024 and prove it factually.
By the way the threat he poses is basically internal - he wants to clear up bueaucratic and political corruption in the USA - everyone know why that is the case. But it would be interesting to know why he is such a huge threat. So please get that get that and tell us why. . .
I jined up and found the following:-
Mr Trump’s protectionist instincts would be unbound, too. In his first term the economy thrived despite his China tariffs. His plans for a second term would be more damaging. He and his lieutenants are contemplating a universal 10% levy on imports, more than three times the level today. Even if the Senate reins him in, protectionism justified by an expansive view of national security would increase prices for Americans. Mr Trump also fired up the economy in his first term by cutting taxes and handing out covid-19 payments. This time, America is running budget deficits on a scale only seen in war and the cost of servicing debts is higher. Tax cuts would feed inflation, not growth.
=This is total economic garble - the o/bjective of Trump is to exportg of jobs tgo oher countries and the idea is to ame job exporting less attractive to the ultra rich. The ibcrease of prices - ie inflatnion is a product of the present administration dure to BS policies and wreckless Government spending on borrowed money. So the argument is that Trump will cut the uktra-rich to size. Trump introduiced tax cuts to ensure that it would lead to small and mediumn businesses to make money and employ more people and it was not inflationary. So why should future policieds differ fcrm what it was in his first term.
Abroad, Mr Trump’s first term was better than expected. His administration provided weapons to Ukraine, pursued a peace deal between Israel, the uae and Bahrain, and scared European countries into raising their defence spending. America’s policy towards China became more hawkish. If you squint, another transactional presidency could bring some benefits. Mr Trump’s indifference to human rights might make the Saudi government more biddable once the Gaza war is over, and strengthen relations with Narendra Modi’s government in India.
But a second term would be different, because the world has changed. There is nothing wrong in countries being transactional: they are bound to put their own interests first. However, Mr Trump’s lust for a deal and his sense of America’s interests are unconstrained by reality and unanchored by values.
Mr Trump judges that for America to spend blood and treasure in Europe is a bad deal. He has therefore threatened to end the Ukraine war in a day and to wreck nato, perhaps by reneging on America’s commitment to treat an attack on one country as an attack on all. In the Middle East Mr Trump is likely to back Israel without reserve, however much that stirs up conflict in the region. In Asia he may be open to doing a deal with China’s president, Xi Jinping, to abandon Taiwan because he cannot see why America would go to war with a nuclear-armed superpower to benefit a tiny island.
What conclusion is the writer of the article coming to? The world situation during the Trump Administration was stable and there was no evcidence that Trump's policies trampled on human rights. Why the hell should there be blood and treasure in Europe. That is real BS - is the writer encourage World War 3. Ending the Ukraine war will save more lives and the war was unnecessary and could have been avoided if treaties were not sabotaged by the US Government. It is wrong to settle international diofference through negotiation? Trump has nver undermined the U S standing in the world - the idiot Biden Administration has done that and it has driven US allies away from the Biden USA and into the arms of BRICS.
I find the above article based on totytal BS and scare conspriacy theories. There is no real evidence provided to prove anything - it was just a collection of mad cap idiocy and total blindmess to reaqlity.
Well said Mike. I admire your patience and the time you took to shred this absurd article.
You have to be insane to belief this rubbish. If you can't see the difference in the world and the fortunes of America now and when Trump was President you are a complete mampara. Dumb as a rock.