Shame on you
Shame on you
Which part is shameful?...I scanned through it quickly after reading you comment...
I don't see anything in Mike's post that is either not factual, false or misleading, so I'm also not sure what he should feel shameful about.... it's pretty much a good summary of that absolutely awful interview that Kamala did, where all she did was literally blame Trump, far too many times.... and again, point blank refused to discuss or detail any of her own policies.
She has no policies.
Correct, she offers literally nothing to the American people ...
After 4 years in power with wee Joey she's got nothing in the tank except "but, but, but Trump".
Harris is not a great candidate, but like Biden, her strongest point is not being Trump.
Trump plans to establish Project 2025, a backward system where America will become a white Christian country again. America will be back in the 1950's.
If Harris loses she will step aside. If Trump loses, we can expect another Jan 6th.
"If Trump loses, we can expect another Jan 6th. "
Harris is not a great candidate, but like Biden, her strongest point is not being Trump.
Yeah, not being someone else as a strongest selling point is really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Yeah, not being someone else as a strongest selling point is really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
While scum rises to the top.
but I don't think he'll get support this time.
He'll get a fat lot of support from the Oath Keepers, Proud Boys and Christian Zealots.
"Yeah, not being someone else as a strongest selling point is really scraping the bottom of the barrel."
I think my criticism of both candidates, in particular their focus on slamming each other instead of bringing something positive to the table, is documented on this forum.
I liked what I saw from Harris in the Fox interview it's a pity she didn't show more of it earlier in the campaign.
I find the criticisms of Harris hilarious in the context of this election.
Some of those criticisms might be valid if this was a normal election and she was running against a normal Republican. But she's running against Donald Trump. Its like comparing someone who got a parking ticket to someone who caused a 50 car pile up on a freeway due to dangerous driving.
As for she has no policies. Has anyone gone and googled Kamela Harris policies?
She has policies, whether or not you agree with them is up to you. Now you could argue what's out there about her policies is light on details, but I don't see that as being anyway different from other candidates during previous Presidential campaigns. The only difference with Harris is her late arrival into the campaign, which made her a bit of an unknown.
I liked what I saw from Harris in the Fox interview it's a pity she didn't show more of it earlier in the campaign.
Yeah unlike Biden in 2020, the more Harris puts herself out their the better it is for her.
As for she has no policies.
That's just another pathological lie....end of.
That's just another pathological lie....end of.
Yeah, quite a few of them.
She's not qualified or is only their because she is a DEI candidate is another classic.
This is despite her serving 7 years as the DA of San Francisco, 6 years as Attorney General of California, 4 years as a senator and 4 years as Vice President.
Remind what was Trump's political experience back in 2016?
She slept around to get her career started is another.
She slept around to get her career started is another.
Sick......is how I describe that comment.
I guess Anonymous can say anything on a rugby message board while hiding behind a keyboard.
I guess Anonymous can say anything on a rugby message board hiding behind a keyboard.
That's the internet in general. People say all manner of stuff on the net that they would never say face to face.
From an objectie political perspective some things are very clear to the American voters and tht is clear from opinion poll a well, 72% of the voters of all races said the Biden was a financial disaster for them and 61% saod Biden wa a failed President.
So what would have been a real opportunity for Harris should have been to come up with clear idications of what her policies would be different from the disstrous Biden failures had been in respect of -
* changes in exact economic policies that would enhance the financial sitituation of the middle class, working class and poorer elements of the people;
* stop undermiing of law and order by the presidency and Justice Department';
* change he illegal migrant fiasco and hel the migrants to srvive n a way treating them better than ordinary workers and the poor in the USA;
* stop rampant corruption invoving politicians and bureaucrats in the USA; and
* dealig with world instability that became notorious during the Biden presidency.
She did none of it and that is where te problem lies, She will protect the scum selling out the US interests to China and Iran in particular/
She should also have stated what she would be done about Biden's threat to cause riots if the Democrats lose the election.
She did not do anything about thsoe issues and blame the disastrous issues arising during the Biden Preidency on Trump. \
So lets face real facts - she promised the US voters no change in anything and that is why she and her lying Commie VP has to offer the people of the USA. Te Chinese are alreadddy preparing their army for war against Taiwan and South Korea if she ins in the election and the USA would not be able to do anything about it - while the list of nemy coutries of t USA would grow accordingly. BRICS already have a list of around 60 countries who applied or membership - and the Chines are udermining the USA interests worldwide,
Hr policies would be the same disastrous joke under Biden - the USA paid billions of dollars in aid to keep their peope at home and not going to the USA. In return the Central and South American countries to whom the USA paid the money in return emptied their jails .and send 475 000 criminals to the USA while the money they were paid vanished in a sea of corruption.
Now amunt of shitspreadig and lies would prevent her from losing the electionmnow nly 2 weeks away,
Fair enough, she has policies. My bad.
My somewhat snide comment was because 1) she seems incapable of wording those policies without them being thrown up on a teleprompter, which makes me believe they're only attributed to her and that beyond that she has nothing to do with them and 2) it's hard to see value in someone who is one big facade.
She's the face of the collective...and she didn't win one deligate to be the nominee...last women standing ...candidate by default..a farce...carefully crafted farce.
She's the face of the collective.
She's a Borg Queen?
and she didn't win one deligate to be the nominee.
Emm 4,615 delegates voted for her.
..a farce...carefully crafted farce.
They're eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats.
"she seems incapable of wording those policies without them being thrown up on a teleprompter, which makes me believe they're only attributed to her and that beyond that she has nothing to do with them"
Which is precisely why I still say that she has no policies.... but maybe her "team" does, and her name is just attached to those policies.
Obviously she has had some policies before in the past with her various positions that she has held..... but I am specifically referring to her detailed policies surrounding her run for president.
She point blank refuses to discuss anything specific regarding her policies, because she cannot articulate or answer any direct questions about them, even in pre-recorded interviews, not just live ones....despite many different people who have interviewed her, asking her about them.
She is always very evasive, using word salad to hop around even the most basic of questions, and when she is stumped, she goes back to bringing up Trump and blaming him all the time.
She has also already admitted that she would not change anything that happened under the Biden administration.....which is just crazy.
Despite the massive overall negative media attention that she has received because she refuses to discuss these personal policies that she apparently has for when she is president, she has still refused to do so, in detail, which dramatically harms her chances to get elected.
I believe she has lost a large portion of potential voters, for this very reason, but she resolutely and defiantly will still not discuss her own policies.... but then again, why would you if you cannot answer even the most basic questions about them.
Just look at her face when she gets a very basic question on the economy, or look at Oprah's face when Harris tried to answer one or two audience member's questions.....it wasn't even funny, it was sad.
When recently asked about her policies, she replied that people can look at her website to see her policies....
Harris, or her team, needs to sit down, think, and type out some well thought out response regarding her policies, hence why she refers people to her website to see her policies.... and that is why when there is an issue with the teleprompter, which recently happened, or she is asked a live question...she just can't continue to talk, because she doesn't really know what to say.... she is completely lost..and talks in circles
For someone who is apparently so determined to become the next president of the US, she is deliberately harming her chances by not discussing "her" important policies that could put her there.
"She's a Borg Queen?"
Something like that...frightingly similar.
"Emm 4,615 delegates voted for her."
Yes, Biden's voted for her because Biden was forced out after the disastrous debate...she wasn't primaried...and everyone knew long ago Biden wouldn't be fit for another term...he wasn't fit for his first...fool yourself all you like.
"They're eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats."
Unfortunately that's probably more probable than we would like to believe.
55,176 posts
Take for instance the ineiew Fox News arranged an interiew with B=Harris with Brett Baier - a known Democrat supporter working for Fox News so watch he following video;-
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She did not answer any question explaining anything and she provided no answer to any of her policies in future and took no responsibility for anything that happened under the Biden Administration.
Everything she claimed that went wrong under Biden she blamed on Trump. She did nothing about border security and claimed that in he Bill submitted allowed for 5 000 illegal migrants and the House would have nothing to do with the so-called Bill submited by Biden and Harris.
When it comes to economic poicy she is going to follow The policy panel of experts - but did not provide any information on the issue what she is going to do as to econmic poiicy implementation. Instead she spoke about Trump be responsible as towat ahppened when Biden was President and she was VP.
As matter of fact whenever asked about Biden and being suffering from dementia - she aways answered that the problems were caused by Trump - whose name she mentioned 20 times.
In an discussion on the interview he DP member of the Five said she did no answer for anything and was evasive and got away from the real problems happening during the Biden Presidency blaming TRump for it, She obviously was disappointed by Harris and sated it clearly.
Even not attending the Smith Dinner in New York - a fundraising event attended by virtually all presidential candidates Harris did not attend. Ever cadidate that attend the dinner get an opportunity to make a speech containing jokes and not any real cmpaigning and get an opportunity to answer questions on issues in the same vein, For some reason or another Harris refused the invitation and send a video to be played at the Dinner and it did not go down well with the attendants, The fact is a very large percentage of the voters supporting the DP in the past -but to them the non-attendanc of Harris was a slap in te face of American Catholics,\
That type of things is not what help her in her election campaign 3 weeks before the election.