The are probably creating it right now. 

Take a look at this Daily Mail Article. But also look at the Comments. The People are wide awake now. 

The WEF Globalists intend to reduce the population to 1 billion. Many useless eaters will be terminated. 

WHO predict deadly virus.

Its called Beenoitis...and it causes irreversible and deadly stupidity.

What is the phycological motive for wanting to believe in stuff like this?
This is what Chat GPT opines

The belief in conspiracies, even when there is suspicion that they are not true, can be attributed to several psychological and sociological factors. Here are a few possible reasons:

1. Cognitive biases: Humans are susceptible to cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and availability heuristics. Confirmation bias refers to the tendency to search for, interpret, and recall information in a way that confirms preexisting beliefs. The availability heuristic leads people to rely on readily available information, which can be influenced by vivid or memorable events. These biases can contribute to the reinforcement of conspiracy beliefs, as people selectively seek out and interpret information that aligns with their existing suspicions.

2. Need for control and certainty: Conspiracy theories often offer a sense of control and certainty in an uncertain world. Believing in a conspiracy can give individuals a feeling of understanding and explanation for complex events or situations that may otherwise be difficult to comprehend or accept. It provides a simple, black-and-white narrative that offers a sense of order in a chaotic world.

3. Distrust of authority: Conspiracy theories tend to flourish in societies where there is a general distrust of authorities, governments, or mainstream institutions. People may feel that those in power are not transparent or trustworthy, leading them to seek alternative explanations for events or phenomena. Conspiracy theories can provide an alternative narrative that challenges the official version of events and empowers individuals to question authority.

4. Social identity and belonging: Believing in a conspiracy theory can provide individuals with a sense of belonging to a specific group or community. It can create a shared narrative and a sense of camaraderie with like-minded individuals who believe in the same conspiracy. This social aspect can reinforce and strengthen the belief, as it becomes intertwined with personal identity and group dynamics.

5. Psychological motivations: Some individuals may be drawn to conspiracy theories due to psychological motivations, such as the need for uniqueness, a desire for significance, or a sense of special knowledge. Believing in a conspiracy theory can make individuals feel special or superior by possessing "secret" knowledge that the majority of people are unaware of.

It's important to note that not all people who entertain conspiracy theories necessarily believe them to be true. Some may engage with conspiracy theories out of curiosity, skepticism, or as a form of entertainment. However, these theories can still be influential and shape public discourse, especially when they gain traction and are amplified through social media and other communication channels. 

Chat GPT"

Chat GPT 2

The claim that the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Economic Forum (WEF) Globalists intend to reduce the global population to 1 billion and terminate individuals deemed "useless eaters" is a baseless conspiracy theory that lacks credible evidence. It's important to approach such claims with critical thinking and evaluate them based on facts and reliable information. Here's a counter-argument:

1. Lack of credible evidence: Conspiracy theories often rely on anecdotal evidence, misinformation, and speculation rather than credible sources. In the case of the claim you mentioned, there is no substantial evidence from reputable sources supporting the notion of a deliberate population reduction plan by the WHO or the WEF. Without reliable evidence, it becomes difficult to accept such a far-reaching claim.

2. Contradiction with official goals and actions: The WHO is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. Its primary objective is to promote health, prevent diseases, and ensure the well-being of all people worldwide. Similarly, the WEF focuses on improving global economic conditions, addressing social issues, and fostering sustainable development. Both organizations have publicized their goals, strategies, and initiatives, which do not align with the conspiracist claim of population reduction or termination of individuals.

3. Global collaboration for public health: The WHO collaborates with governments, experts, and stakeholders from around the world to address public health challenges, provide medical assistance, and promote health equity. Their work is rooted in scientific research, data analysis, and evidence-based policies. Population reduction or termination would contradict the core principles of public health and the mission of the WHO, which is to save lives and improve health outcomes for all individuals.

4. Complexity and logistical challenges: Implementing a global population reduction plan to such a drastic extent would require unprecedented control over multiple nations, governments, and institutions. It would involve widespread cooperation, secrecy, and the suppression of information on an unimaginable scale. The logistical challenges and ethical considerations alone make the conspiracist claim highly implausible.

5. Responsible engagement with information: It's crucial to critically evaluate information, verify sources, and rely on reputable scientific and journalistic sources when forming opinions. Conspiracy theories often thrive on misinformation, manipulation, and fear. Engaging in responsible information consumption helps avoid the spread of baseless claims that can cause unnecessary fear, division, and hinder real efforts to address global challenges.

Remember, conspiracies can be captivating, but it is important to approach them with skepticism and a critical mindset. Relying on credible evidence, examining the goals and actions of relevant organizations, and engaging in reasoned discussions based on factual information are vital for a well-informed perspective.