If my aunt had balls - she would have been my uncle. In any event the Aussies buggered up royally with their appeals erlier in the match when there was still a small chance that they may win - but they wasted their appeals. By the time Vereynne came on the match was won already.
Woosh
Do you think he was convinced he had touched it? Doubt it. Down leg twist to try make contact - doubt he was convinced he touched it
You may be right, as I recall his bat hit the pitch almost simultaneously …Still it would have been a moment talked about forever like the endless test.
If my aunt had balls - she would have been my uncle father.
'Thirty years a batsman might have done that.'
Actually, Adam Gilchrist did it 22 years ago in a semi final when there were no reviews.
I used to walk but always regretted it as so often you are given out when you are not especially at the level we play
My walking was not a moral thing it was an automatic reaction
I will never forget my good mate giving me out once - it was an lbw, but given I was a leftie and this guy was bowling over the wicket it was almost impossible to get an lbw unless it swung a mile.
My mate felt so bad, kept buying me beers - he said he panicked and just stuck his finger up when they appealed - he never umpired again - took to scoring instead
"Actually, Adam Gilchrist did it 22 years ago in a semi final when there were no reviews."
In that team, they could all have walked and still won.
The man who didn’t walk
South Africa were beaten 0-1 by England in the home series next season; Barlow, however, continued with his fine form, scoring 558 runs at 55.80 with 138 and 78 at Newlands, along with one 96, 3 more fifties, and 2 more forties; he also picked up 5 wickets. It was at Newlands, though, that Barlow made the headlines for a complete different reason.
On Day One of the Test, Barlow tried to block a ball from Fred Titmus that flew to gully, only to be caught by Peter Parfitt. John Warner ruled him not out. This was followed by a heated banter between Barlow and Titmus. This was followed by a tone of sarcasm that the English fielders maintained throughout the day: they did not acknowledge when Barlow reached his brilliant hundred, but broke into a resounding applause that went well over the board when Tony Pithey reached his fifty.
Things got murkier the next day after the press had a go at England. The crowd got behind South Africa, barracking the English batsmen and asking them to walk after every bat-pad appeal.
Ken Barrington rose to the occasion, once walking in mock, followed by an incident when he edged one from Peter Pollock to Denis Lindsay, tried a mock walk, then decided that he should come back; the entire incident completely confused the umpire. To confuse everyone even further, Barrington eventually decided to walk amidst a loud applause, but later apologised to Warner.
45,728 posts
….he would have gone down in the annals of the game and established cricket as the ultimate example of sportsmanship. Thirty years ago a batsmen might have done that. But it was poetic justice that the Aussies had no more reviews after some of the silly lbw calls they tried. Also a final historic black mark on the umpiring which was pretty atrocious.