In 2018 I wrote a number of comments on site about the situation iro driving mauls stemming from line-outs going absent from the Springbok team and I identified Mostert is the key deficient element in the situation. The malignant three idiots claimed I was talking nonsense and with bravado claimed that the winning try by the Springboks against the French was formed and organized by Mostert.
An analysis of the situation in the latter case showed that what they wrote was utter BS. Mostert did catch the ball and tried to organize a maul but failed totally in the process. It was only after the organization of the maul was taken over by Du Toit joined afterwards by Vermeulen that the maul started to go forward. Mostert role - other than catching the ball - was totally defective.
Now back to the game on Friday. I want to refer to a driving maul at roundabout minute 20 when Du Toit took the ball in the air and organized and controlled the functioning of a very successful driving maul. That is to be compared with a similar attempt by Mostert in minute 30 when Mostert caught the ball and then the whole maul effort collapsed and we ended up with what can at best be called a total failure in forming of a maul ending in a possession turnobver by the Japanese.
Now lets look at the factual situation this year. Mostert -
* failed in the line-outs in the AB test;
* was never used in Line-outs in the subsequent Argentina test;
* actually failed in line-outs against the Japanese as well.
Obviously - whenever somebody punched holes in their theories about player performance the three "experts" (as they regard themselves as) lose total perception as to what actually happened and missed out totally on prove provided by other members, The three are only trying to deceive us all by their constant BS.