Can't believe the bald Italian gets to ref the final.
Can't believe the bald Italian gets to ref the final.
Leinster putting the Bulls scrum under pressure and they get the penalty.
Another penalty Leinster. 5m lineout.
Howzit Paks...
This ref!
Why this guy???
And try. Conan over.
Conan is over. Prendergast converts and it's 7-0 to Leinster.
ButtPlug, has there ever been a game where you didn't moan about the ref? Even once?
Howzit Plum. No idea why this idiot is reffing. 7-0 Leinster.
A dude that had to take some time off during this very tournament to get reacquainted with the laws of the game shouldn't be reffing a final.
Bulls just can't get any possession.
Better passage for the Bulls.
Handbags and of course play has to be stopped for that. What a sissy game this is turning into.
That's not an eye gouge, get on with it.
He didn;t get to ref the final because he's an idiot. When you guys bitch and moan about his decisions, be sure to tell us exactly what he did wrong.
Harold Vorster lucky to not get a card for an eye-gouge attempt.
Oh god is this gonna be yellow card for a hand touching the guys face?
Penalty only.
Eye gouge?
Do you know where the eyes are located?
Congrats to Bath on winning the Premiership. Pollard missed a pretty easy penalty kick that cost Leicester the game.
Everything looks worse in super slomo. Full speed there was not even a chance that was an attempted gouge.
Jordie scores. My streams are chugging.
Jordie Barrett kicks through and scores. I wonder if that was also the ref's fault?
14-0.
14-0
Kriel does really well to beat defenders and offload but Vorster drops it.
Kriel beats three, gets the offload to Vorster who drops it.
Iere is taai in Dublin asit reën....kom Kalfies.
Ref blows too early but fixes his mistake. Leinster with an attacking lineout.
WTF he already blew!!!
Willie with a poor kick but lucky that Lowe knocks it on.
Willie se kop raas!
Nice one Willie.
Bulls better switch on or they're going to get a drubbing.
The ball was out. The ref made the right call after getting it wrong intially. The fact that he blew too early had no impact on the game and he ended up with the right decision.
Scrum penalty Bulls.
Support player was surely impeded there for Leinster?
Maybe not. Lineout 5.
Van der Vlier scores. Looks like the Bulls are going to get a hiding today.
And another try. Van der Flier fliers over.
Prendergast misses the conversion. 19-0.
At this rate, not sure I'll be watching the second half...
19 - 0
Lyk my Leinster se droogte word vanaand gebreek.
Ja well if they keep kicking the precious little possession they get back to the opposition they're not going to get anywhere. That's what I said last week, if they're going to do this "non-playing-playing" thing that they did for much of the game against the Sharks they are going to get beat.
Jake unfortunately has the tendency for excessive caution and conservatism in playoffs. Doesn't work if the other team came to play.
Prendergast overcooks his cross kick otherwise Leinster were in again.
Leinster are constantly in front of the kicker and the linesman apparently can see it
Goosen's kicking out of hand has been abysmal
Love Pompus claiming Vorster tried an eye gouge…what a tit
And more kicking possession away.
STFU Moffie.
Now Bulls throw in skew at the lineout. Leinster back on attack.
I get the feeling this game is going to be a whole lot of kick tennis.
Leinster only want to kick.
The Bulls need to adapt
Marcel needed someone to run onto his offload at pace, huge space next to him. Bulls getting close though.
Bulls laying siege to the Leinster line and lose it but penalty advantage was being played. Bulls still on attack . . . Leinster knock on and Bulls have the attacking scrum. They have to score here to stay in this.
Coetzee picks and goes but the Bulls are being tackled backwards . . . Bulls refuse to send it wide and are still in possession but going nowhere. Now they send it to the backs but Willie kicks it straight back to Leinster.
Cobus wiese off for a HIA, replaced by Jannes Kirsten.
And after 50 bashes that made 1 meter of ground Willie just kicks it to Leinster.
Willie having a nightmare
Seriously...Willie?
Kicks possession away.
To be fair, Leinster were offside about 10 times there during those Bulls phases
I'm having serious doubts about watching the second half, this is some tragic rugby.
Pompus we are all watching the game….no need for the obvious commentary
That last lineout throw by the Bulls was just as skew as the one they were pinged for. Bulls get a penalty.
STFU Moffie.
These match day threads are for rugby, not for your childish little taunts.
Gotta be a yellow coming if Leinster keeps leaking penalties like this in the red zone.
If the pick and go was a couch the springs would be sticking out of it now from the Bulls wearing it out.
Bulls on attack just before half time . . . they bash it up until it goes wide to Moodie who doesn't back himself and then Willie throws a forward pass and it's half time. 19-0.
Again ….stop providing commentary….we don’t need it Pompus you tit.
The South African teams just have ZERO backline play.
In that final passage of play, Leinster had 11 of there 15 players around the ruck and the Bulls just refuse to send it to the line.
I don't get it.
We may as well play with a pack of forwards and 7 flankers.
Watching Coetzee running from a standing start into a pod of defenders can only have a bad result.
I'm gonna do something else and keep an eye on the Supersport live updates to see if anything interesting is happening. This is painful to watch.
Now let me get this straight. The Bulls played Jakeball; withlout any game plan. Whenever somebody tries to move the ball to the backline it reached Willie who makes shit kicks losing territory in the process, I am always a great admirer of Willie - but under Jakeball he is a bloody liability,
Big difference in the match - Leinster played rugby the Buls did not, .
Moffie, why don't you write a strongly-worded letter to the Editor telling him that naughty Rooinek is commenting on the rugby game? Just stop whining like a little bitch.
I’m just hoping…..thick as you are…..you finally realize posting drivel like:
Prendergast misses the conversion. 19-0
….adds zero. If by some miracle you have something interesting to say feel free to do so. Otherwise shut it.
Bulls are looking BS.
Wessels being worked in every scrum is destroying the Bools scrum
RooiNuts very rarely has anything interesting to add.
It part of why he's such a knob. He knows exactly what an uninteresting bore he is and it frustrates him.
Akker vd Meeeerv
Bulls not giving up!
The Bulls just need a little momentum and to make a few less mistakes, they have a chance.
Akker makes a difference to the scrum as well
Finally the Bulls are getting some scum dominance.
This could be the momentum they need...
Leinster miles off side in half the loose scrums
Okay...there goes the scum dominance.
Leinster getting away with pushing early
58 mins gone and if Leinster score again then I'm switching off
My word that offload by RG was good
Is this guy really Ireland's kicker?
He's friggin terrible
The irony the ref calls the Bools offside when Leinster has been off all game
De Klerk injured and the Bulls have zero ideas.
I'm done.
Can't be bothered to watch the last 15 minutes of this absolute shit show.
Back to watch the last bit. We call scores and replacements etc. all the time on these threads.
Another penalty for Leinster and Pretendergast will go for the 3. 25-7
Now Akker slips and drops the pass. Would probably have been a slightly more watchable game at Loftus.
Leinster drops the pass, Bulls immediately kicks it back to them.
Willie should probably just leave the field, don't even bother replacing him.
And Leinster show the Bulls some rugby and score again.
32-7. This has been an embarrassment for SA rugby.
Oh now the Bulls want to run it, 25 down with 5 minutes to go.
Pathetic seeing Nienaber in his subservient role. That said the Leinster defence is watertight.
Wonder how RG feels playing against his team mates and vice versa.
Non event, Bulls were awful, Ladyboys coast it in 2nd gear.
LOL, and still the Bulls kick it back to Leinster, even 25 points down. Clueless.
Well that was the best of SA provincial rugby. Jake, bless his little shoes and all he has achieved, can't coach finals to save his arse.
Outplayed, outclassed, outdone...A useful as tits on a bull.
What bothered me is the TOTAL ABSENCE of a GAME PLAN for the match,
I forecasted a win by Leinster - but only by a 7 points margin. That shows somethig wrong with the team management..
Here's what I truly believe Jake tells the lads once it's playoffs time:
"Okay boys, remember all we've done this season? How we've molded the forwards into a well oiled unit that hunts like a pack and physically dominates whatever gets in their way? Remember the lines we ran to score, the offloads we used to put people away and keep the momentum going, the runner we had on every shoulder? Well, forget all of that shit. All I want you to do in these last games is to kick whatever possession we manage to secure back to the other guys and hope they don't know what to do with it, and to pick and go until something breaks. None of the other stuff, just that."
The joke is that worked against the Sharks because they really didn't know what to do with all that free and easy possession, but it was never going to work against a remotely competent side.
What a pathetic lame performance that was
Commentators said Jake prayed for rain - well he got that but we saw no plan to capitalise on his pray
Yeah watched Jakes after match press conference and he mentioned it himself but also said that basically in order for the Bulls to beat a team like Leinster it would require Leinster to have a bad game.
Came across as a totally defeatist attitude. It doesn't require Leinster to have a bad game, it requires a team to make Leinster have a bad game.
Northampton beat Leinster in the Champions Cup Semi final and they are not as good a team as Leinster but they won that match on the day, wasn't Leinster losing it.
It's alright being a realist as Jake says and say yeah sure on paper full strength Leinster at home will beat the Bulls 7 times out of 10 or whatever, but you still need to have you players believe that if they play to their full potential they can win on the day.
Well done Leinster.
Strange to think we’ve beaten both of the URC Finalists this season ;)
Congrats to the Irish ... Bulle were woeful. An embarrassment.
This type of rugby is typical Jake White teams gameplan or lack thereof in play-off games and finals, Lets gove some examples:-
So why does it happen in critical matches where wins could have helped the teams coahed by White/ Pakie gave an exact description of what happened to the teams coached by White - I could not describe it better, But there is another issue that I have never seen in teams coached by White and seen in evey critical match the Springboks used systematically by Erasmus, Study the pro's and con"s of every opposition player and in defense and in attacks neutralize them by playing to each player weaknesses with defense against their strengths by systematic defense.
The trend over the years became apparant - when playing in critical games kicked he shit out of balls, I develop a name for the game plan in critical games - it is called Jakeball and means not playing real rigby at all.. The difference between Meyer and White alweays was is thatWhuite had one siccessful tirunament to brag about - Meyer was worse since he never won in anything and White could count on the 2007 RWC in his favor,
I myself wonder how long Motsepe and Rupert would put up with White as coach, They would rather consider replacing him with any other coach and even Nienaber springs to mind, All A franchise coaches bar theLions have poor coaches. I think if the Lions had the money to recruit and retain players the Bulls and Sharks have they managed to play better rugby in some games than the Bulls and Sharks managed in critical matches.
So the Sharks, Bulls and Stormers need top class coaches and they should strive to find better coaces than they had ove the last two years,
.
There is the not insignificant point of flying to Ireland and having 5 days to recover and play the match. Time again in super rugby we saw teams underperforming the first match after flying.
Lots of criticism of the Bools tactics….but they are the Springbok rugby tactics. Defend, kick and scrum. Today Wessels was dominated so the scrums never worked…and the tactical kicking was poor. But here are some stats which might surprise you:
Possession and Territory was 50/50…the Bools beat 20 defenders to 13…made 78% of their tackles to 79%.
The biggest difference was Leinster had 10 clean breaks to 1. The Bulls defence was too narrow when breached. Leinster defended brilliantly, perhaps Nienaber had a role. And there were a few odd bounces of the rugby ball, eg in Barrett’s try.
Apart from the disappointing scrumming, the Bools were horribly predictable near the oppo goal line. But we saw the same tendencies in the Boks vs Ireland last year. Where we scored 24 points in the second test….all off Pollard’s boot.
The tactics are okay if the it’s the Boks and the win…but not okay if it’s the Bools and they lose. It’s dead head rugby either way
Mozart
Lots of criticism of the Bools tactics….but they are the Springbok rugby tactics. Defend, kick and scrum. Today Wessels was dominated so the scrums never worked…and the tactical kicking was poor. But here are some stats which might surprise you:
The Springboks do NOT play a similar game plan to what was used yesterday by White. You refuse to accept that the game plan used by Meyer and Coetzee were changed drastically by Erasms and claim the kick and chase game is still what it was in 2015 - when you called it "traditional Springbok rugby".
Under White in 2007 it was the same as 2015 - accept in the Round Robin matches where Jones presence was clear - but White himself claimed that perhaps he is to be blamed for not been able to win in play-off matches and finals since 2007. It was confirmed when Smit wrote in his book about the 2007 final - namely there were NO provision for attacking rugby by planning for attacks that could be used to score tries.
Fact is there were one example in 2007 and what happened yesterday thrice, In 2007 the Springbks only attack ended up on the five meter line and the forwards tried repeatedly to score until the Springboks lost ball possession. It did not happen yesterday once - it happened at least 3 times, The Bulls backline did not line up for such a pofential attack oppomttiy situation where the balls could be past to them - most of the players were trying to become part of the fiorwards tying to score tries, Needless to say in all three occassions the result were the same - in the end no tries scored and no successful backline attack.
So please stop your twisted desciptions as to what happened in matches and when you make sure that stories about what happened under Ersmus is not just twssted BS. The Sprinboks won the first test against the Irish and lost the second one by 1 point due to two dropkicks they made - not by 25 points yesterday, Get real.
. .
Moz that is absolute bullshit, the only time the Boks played a predominantly kicking game was post Covid as Rassie said they had to keep it simple as no rugby had been played for a while
The Boks kick it no more or less than any other top sides out there these days in fact if memory serves me correctly we kick it less than most of the sides
The Bulls were given piss poor direction in that final
I thought Wessels at scrum time conceded the advantage every time on the engage, he has plenty to learn - I guess player hooker one week then loosehead the next is not serving his development that well
Goosen channel was also targeted early on where he was exposed defensively only because he had big guys physically dominating him
No plan was put in place to counter that obvious weakness
Dave
I agree with you and stay with what I wrote, about the match.
The other BS story is the travel issue, There is an hour time difference between Ireland and SA time in NH Summers and that does not affect the players in the same way as flights to Australia and New Zealand do. Being in Ireland for 4 or 5 days before the match should have had no impact on the match on Saturday.
These players spend their lives travelling it’s no longer an excuse
Travel didn't affect Munster or Glasgow in 2023 and 2024 finals.
It's so damn sad to see the absolute lack of IQ in SA rugby.
And if it hasn't changed by now it likely never will.
I maintain, Swys and Akkerman were the best coaching duo we've ever had.
They knew how to balance attacking responsibility between backs and forwards. No other coach before or since has come close to figuring that out...in SA.
It was Springbok rugby….how many times have we seen the bull like charges at the line without an offload. Oddly the Bools do offload well, but when the chips were down in the final they reverted to charging the ramparts. Everybody got the ball standing still as well.
As for the travel of course it affects your metabolism. Anybody who has flown UK/SA knows that.
Just the usual the stupid comments by those who are anti Jake
As for kicking, here are the WC kick/runstats in the knockouts:
NZ 18%/ Boks30%
Eng 33%/Boks 30%
France 13%/ Boks 25%
Draw your own conclusions. We play the same game as England….not France or NZ. Set pieces/kick/defend.
We score tries from mauls and turnover pressure. When the Boks are in the oppo 25 and have to construct a try they look much like the Bools did yesterday.
As for the travel of course it affects your metabolism. Anybody who has flown UK/SA knows that.
It does but given the results of the last two years, it can't be used as an excuse.
Just the usual the stupid comments by those who are anti Jake
I'm not anti Jake, I've defended him in the past, but I found his attitude after the game defeatist. If he was like that before the match all it would have done is undermine the team's confidence.
I suspect that White will be obless by the end of June 2025 with a new coach to be appointed qithin a week or two since the URC tournament in 2025-26 starting on 26 August 2025.
I will be he first to wish him well for the future .if that happens.
18% vs 30 is probably all of 3 more kicks in a whole game - this notion that we kick so much more than other sides is a load of rubbish - chances are you are going to play it more conservatively in WC knock out games anyway
I bet the % are closer in non WC games
We score tries just like other sides do - maul tries are high on the list of all sides. Our wings have the highest potential f strike rates for a reason
This rubbish about the Bulls players being inferior to the Leinster players is also rubbish - Irish caps and all - well that made little impression on Northampton a few weeks ago
It’s about having the right gameplan and attitude - Jake has been pathetically defeatist and his post match analysis evidenced that. He should be sacked on the strength of his negativity - those Bulls had no chance given their coaches attitude
What happens when the Bulls face Leinster next season with his players having heard Jakes concessions
Player comparisons
Willie vs their 15 - I don’t even know his name - Willie all day long
Lowe vs Moodie - I’m taking Moodie despite Lowe being a class act
de Klerk vs their wing - again nothing in it
Ringrose vs Kriel - you take Ringrose for his experience but we know how good Kriel is so nothing in it
Vorster vs Jordie - Jordie all day long
Goosen v Pen - Goosen walks it
Papier vs their replacement 9 - Papier all day long
Wessels vs Porter - Porter gets it for his experience but Wessels has been awesome all season - a poor engagement in the final does not define him
Grobelaar vs Sheenan - Sheenan walks it but Grobelaar is damn good
Wilco vs their 3 - no contest Wilco blindfolded
Wiese vs McCarthy - nothing in it
JF vs Ryan - nothing in it
v Staaden vs vd Vlier - vd Vlier but v Staaden is a Bok
Nortje vs their 7 - nothing in it
Coetzee vs Conan - nothing in it
So Leinster have an edge but not to the point you concede - much like the Saints never did
It’s thanks to that pathetic defeatist attitude of Jake thst saw his team having no chance
Watson derangement syndrome
Oh is it now - which of these Leinster players are far superior to the Bulls and how come the Saints had no difficulty putting Leinster away huh?
Reality vs your bullshit
Let’s see:
Ringrose….Lion
Lowe…Lion
vd Flier…Lion
Sheehan…Lion
Conan…Lion
Kelleher…Lion
McCarthy…Lion
Porter…Lion
Ryan….Lion
So 10 Lions , Snyman the best #5 lock in the world and Jordie Barrett NZ’s incumbent 12.
Pretty much a Lions equivalent team. Reality vs your fantasies Dave. Get real man and fight against that Watson Derangement Syndrome. It’s screwed you up for 20 years, time to go cold turkey.
So explain Northampton beating them then
Willie - a Bok
Moodie - a Bok
Goosen - a Bok
Papier - a Bok
Wessels - a Bok
Grobelaar - a Bok
Wilco - a Bok
Cobus Wiese - about to be a Bok
v Staaden - a Bok
Nortje - a Bok
Coetzee - a Bok
Aker - a Bok
11 Boks plus 1 to be capped within a month and let’s face it David Kriel should be a Bok and lock JF v Heerden will be a Bok soon
The Boks beat the Lions
Case closed
Correction let’s get current:
Willie a Bok
Moodie a Bok
Wessels a Bok aspirant
Wilco a Bok
Nortje a Bok
Wiese a Bok
Van Staden a Bok
That makes 7 Bools in a 45 man Bok squad…..vs 10 Lions in a 38 man Lions team…12 equivalents if we add Barrett and Snyman. And of your team of current Boks and aspirant Boks, exactly one player Wilco, was in our last serious test against England last November. The Bools’ Boks are largely yesterdays men and a few unproven youngsters.
And we narrowly beat the Lions at home….the Bools played Leinster away with 6 days and 12 hours of flying time to prepare.
Game, set and match. Get over your WDS!
Here goes reality
Porter, Sheenan and Lowe are the only Leinster players that will start for the Lions
vd Vlier and Ringrose might make the bench
Id expect us to only just beat the Lions - so what we beat them
Flight and 6 days is a piss poor excuse
But most importantly you keep avoiding the key question, how did Northampton manage to beat them?
Answer that question
Simples, it was an upset:
‘This competition has seen a few remarkable results over the years but few to match this sweetest of Saints days. Maybe Leinster thought that a fourth successive Champions Cup final appearance was a formality against supposedly outgunned English opposition. If so they were made to pay a heavy price with a triple whammy of tries from Tommy Freeman.’
Just as it would have been an upset if the Bools beat Leinster. You keep making my points for me…gracias!
And perhaps this will help you understand the effects of travel:
| Performance MetricTypical Impact RangeSource/Context | ||
| Win Probability | ? 10–25% | Super Rugby studies; team travel analyses |
| Points Scored | ? 3–7 points per match on average | Mitchell et al. 2017; travel fatigue models |
| Tackle Completion % | ? 2–5% | Super Rugby & IRB data reviews |
| Linebreaks & Metres Gained | ? 10–15% | Performance tracking post-travel |
| Reaction Time / Decision Accuracy | ? 5–10% (psychomotor and cognitive) | General sports science (Fullagar et al. 2015) |
| Injury Risk | ? 10–20% | Jet lag & fatigue-related risk assessments |
Ah an upset lol
Using travel as an excuse in this day and age is equally laughable
Bottom line is Jake’s pathetic defeatist attitude had his team losing the game before they even stepped onto the field
Travel is not an excuse, and even Jake didn't use it as an excuse. Yes it has an effect but both Munster and Glasgow won finals after travelling to SA with a one week turn around.
Yes, it does impact teams, but all teams face the same challenges. Finishing at the top of the tournament gives that team an advantage, which is fair since they earned it by winning the rounds. Teams that win the knockout league should always be given an advantage, like a seeding system.
‘It has an effect…but it’s not an excuse’. It’s a handicap, probably worth about a try if you believe the research. Obviously it can be overcome, the examples you cite. But that doesn’t mean it isn’t a factor.
Have you accepted a team with 12 Lions level players if you include Snyman and Barrett has an advantage on a team that has one player who made the last Bok match 23.
And when you add the 5 point travel handicap, it was a hard ask.
Are these simple facts which apparently eluded you coming into focus?
Nope there are 11 Boks in the Bulls side and only 3 of the Leinster are certain starters
The Boks beat the Lions
Northampton beat Leinster
The travel these days means fuck all as Glasgow and Munster proved
Look no further than Jake with his defeatist attitude that gave his side no chance
Yet the Irish beat the Boks….down goes Dave in flames…hahaha,
And the Boks beat the Irish
Nope since the 2019 WC Ireland lead 3 games to 1, having played 2 of the 4 games in South Africa and only 1 in Ireland……hahahaha, flames Dave, down in.
That’s a long time ago
It has nothing to do with Leinster thumping the Bulls who were beaten by Northampton a few weeks ago proving that a side with less test players in its ranks is more than capable of winning
Whether Moart likes it or not under Easmus's coaching the Springoks one multple trophies uder White it as not so. Fact remains that no teams coached by White since 2007 no trophies were won.
After the previous week's game against the Sharks I thought the chance of the Bulls beating Leinster was remote, as I said on the Sharks string. I could already see the type of game they were going to play. They never backed themselves. If you go in expecting defeat, at least give it a proper shot and go down swinging. Many giants have been slayed in this game. Think of little Despatch smashing the Springbok and Northern Transvaal studded Tukkies in the 1985 club final.
Well that was all thanks to bloody Jake telling everyone he was so envious of the Leinster side and that his side had no chance it hell
It was pathetic to listen to - that defeatist attitude will have rubbed off on the players
His players having heard that pathetic post match rant by Joke White will be filled with confidence the next time they face Leinster - they might as well concede that game now
Looks like Jake could be on his way out and it's in part linked to the comments he made after the defeat to Leinster.
Jake just doesn't have staying power. It appears my assessment of him keeps ringing true - get him in to fix a mess, but let him go after 2 years. That's about when he peaks before the backroom shenanigans and conflicts kick off.
Indeed Pakie...he's got a fine rugby brain, but his people skills sucks...the umpteenth player revolt and at the bools nogal...
In reply to the email I recently received, I'm fine, thank you for asking after me.
I'm posting this reply here because this thread was the last straw for me.
I know we have a lot of insults and bickering on this board - and yes, I've contributed my fair share - but the one saving grace used to be these match threads, where we'd put that stuff aside and actually enjoy watching and commenting on rugby.
That was until Moffie made his appearance on this thread. Just scroll back and compare the comments and the banter before Moffie started posting and after he arrived.
I remember thinking, I come to this board to talk about rugby and to enjoy the game with like-minded rugby fans, not the attention-seeking of a self-important, boastful, childish x-squared-integrating, biased and ignorant old drunkard . . . or to explain to him that in the past, posters like Blob have actually requested that we include scores on these match threads . . . or to point out his stinking hypocrisy, given that many other posters make very similar comments to my own.
Then Moffie's fawning and grovelling little Alpha-Gimp started shrieking and . . . well, let's just say this thread killed the board for me.
I may return one day . . . we'll see.
Well, RooiNuts, I can bring up requests from myself where i encouraged, pleaded with you, to make at least some posts were the goal wasn't an attack on someone. In case you forgot, attacks were the vast majority of what you were doing here anyway.
As someone who, unintentionally but on some level at least, keeps track of players in and out of favour with different board members, your file on the mental hard drive was a lot emptier than most. Cos that's how little you spoke about rugby.
Anyhoos, when you've calmed down, I'd like to hear your take on what transpired this season with the Boks. We disagree on the a lot of things but you and I both agree on what a superstar Willemse is. I know you were screaming at your TV while he was tearing the ABs up in Wellington...and I know that thinking of it now brings a smile to your face ;)
I said so on another thread, but I'll say it here too. That performance from him was a defining one for himself and, just as importantly, for the Boks. Sacha did superbly against the Argies, but I feel like that performance from Gaza was the one that said, in the most certain terms "This is how we should be playing!"
Rudehole, never thought I'd ever say this, but this place is poorer with you gone. You are a proper d!ckhead most of the time, but this place is even more out of sync with you absent...glad to see you didn't fall out of a hotel window or something.
Hoor Hoor DB. Well said that man.
@Rooi, Glad to read you are keeping well.
Rooi you are spot on about Moffie and Buttplug - two complete parasites
Good to hear you are well and fuck me this place is a lot lot poorer without you
I often think what’s the point of me being here as there is very little that is rugby related and when it is it’s the same fucking shit - Rassie is kak, PSDT, DA are kak, the Boks only win because of luck and weak opposition
If I lived in SA and was in the company of my SA friends where rugby conversations abound, I would not bother with this board but unfortunately it’s one of my only SA rugby outlets. But in reality it’s a very sad outlet but you make it a better one so please return
I miss you on here bud
@Dave,
I find myself agreeing with you a lot lately which is worrying, therefore, tsek man, DdA IS kak. Rassie good.
PSDT still a force. We were exceptionally lucky to win those 3 one point games.
"We were exceptionally lucky to win those 3 one point games."
Absolute hogwash.
Writing it off as luck instead of crediting Rassie with instilling a never-say-die winning attitude is shortsighted and downright disrespectful.
Rassie was no "luckier" than our other RWC-winning coaches Kitch Christie and Jake White.
All this talk of Rassie being lucky and the red card or Pollard's kicking being the only reasons we won is because of one loud-mouthed rugby noob getting it spectatularly wrong about Rassie and some of the players and not being man enough to admit it. That's all it is. Nothing more, nothing less.
Those posters who like to pamper that rampant ego and who remain so disrespectful for what the Springboks have achieved these last few years are best left to their pathetic little fantasies and their squealing about luck and whatever else . . . while the rest if us enjoy what is already a Golden Era for Springbok rugby.
Let this negative and biased collection of rugby noobs, dullards and suck-ups wail away. It's actually quite funny . . . especially when you recognise the reason they do it.
LOL, there he is.
"I often think what’s the point of me being here as there is very little that is rugby related and when it is it’s the same fucking shit - Rassie is kak, PSDT, DA are kak, the Boks only win because of luck and weak opposition"
Oh please, you absolute mongrel.
Anybody that doesn't agree with your often stupid takes, is immediately sworn at and belittled.
Not only are you one of the most stupid people I've ever encountered, you're probably the most emotionally retarded.
Wooosh
Buttplug preaching about stupidity when the retard completely misses my point
Listen here you worthless cunt - that hole I spoke about - go jump in it and get your ugly girlfriend to do us all a favour and fill it with concrete
Spot on Rooi dumb fucking Moffie and co are so consumed by their anti Rassie that their best attempts at discrediting him is through luck, weak opposition and apparently the best Bok squad ever or when legends of the game voice their opinions in favour of the coach or players that’s them politically pleasing SA rugby
That’s how fucking desperate these clowns are. It’s sooooo fucking embarrassing but they are seriously too fucking stupid to realise it
Bottom line is they are not true Bok supporters
You bunch of hypocrites make me sick.
Rooinek, you’ve been attacking people on this board for years, it’s literally what you do. Now you suddenly play the poor victim? Don’t make me laugh.
You’ve dished out more abuse than anyone and now that someone finally calls you out, you cry about “toxicity”? Please, man, take your drama somewhere else.
And as for you, David Searle or “Saffolk” as you call yourself, you’re the biggest fake of the lot. You swear, insult, and defame people non-stop, but now you’re pretending to care about “rugby discussions”?
You thrive on stirring kak. You’ve never been about rugby, you just come here to attack people and pat yourself on the back. Fuck you! You a bitter old man hiding behind a keyboard.
You two are the reason this forum turned to garbage, along with the Lunatic cheerleaders like Clevermike, Beeno.
Draad you not that bad, but tend to sit to much on the fence.
Also in the past you have Ganged up with these scoundrels to back stab….that’s not nice and doesn’t suit you:)
You’re all so far up your own backsides and self righteous, you can’t even see how divided and toxic you’ve made this place.
The rest of us — Moz, Plum, Pakie, me, Blob, DA, AJH ( forgive me if I forgot any of the normal people, consider yourself added)
We give normal, balanced criticism. We talk rugby without worshipping Rassie Erasmus like he’s some kind of messiah.
You made your bed, now lie in it!! Stop pretending you’re the victims. The only victims here are the people who actually came to talk rugby while you were busy poisoning the forum with your fake outrage and constant personal attacks!!
"Buttplug preaching about stupidity when the retard completely misses my point"
Or did you miss the point I was making.
That someone as reprehensible as yourself should probably not be discussing the actions of others when they pale in comparison to the lowlife and braindead shit you spew.
I find this all pretty amusing.
I thought South Africa were both lucky and also fully deserving to win the World Cup.
There was many small things that went South Africa's way in some games. For example France hit the crossbar with a penalty kick. It's not like Rassie coached his players not to give a penalty two inches closing to their try line, because that was all the difference between winning and losing that match.
But that's not a knock against South Africa and it doesn't mean they were not deserving winners. Even the good teams need a bit of luck from time to time, but luck alone will not win you a world cup, you also have to be very good.
Mpuff you are so fucking stupid I’m not even going to bother
As thick as a plank
Buttplug you never had a point or if you did it was pointless but it’s a big fucking whooosh for you
One has to love how much you point fingers about how stupid people are only to fucking demonstrate that your stupidity exceeds any accusations you dish out
The measure of a fucking dumb twat is one that points fingers while himself, incapable of setting a standard of intelligence to measure up to.
Classic case of dumb and dumber with the author being the dumber
"But that's not a knock against South and it doesn't mean they were not deserving winners. Even the good teams need a bit of luck from time to time, but luck alone will not win you a world cup, you also also have to be very good."
Well, there's the nuance that Fattex is too thick to understand.
Saying there was more luck involved than there would have been had the Boks won each game by more than 20 points...that's way too philosophical a statement for his Neanderthal brain.
Any talk of luck means it's all luck and the Boks are undeserving.
I shit you not, this is the kind of binary brain mush thinking that this complete idiot engages in and all he's capable of.
‘Pompus’……hahaha….I had forgotten that hilarious spelling error. But I was wrong to point out to Pompus that we didn’t need to read that a player missed a conversion, being on the string and commenting meant we were also watching the game. Where I was wrong was that I assumed he could add some insight or opinion of interest to proceedings.
Come, go, stay Pompus…..I couldn’t care less..
I thought South Africa were both lucky and also fully deserving to win the World Cup.
Nice post, and I completely agree with you
Even that Kolbe charge down against France for that conversion would probably have lost us the world cup then already, had he not done it, we just don't and won't know...
The Boks, as a team, fully deserved to win that world cup, but they certainly also had luck on their side in the process of doing it as well.
You bunch of hypocrites make me sick.
Excellent post Mpower
"The Boks, as a team, fully deserved to win that world cup, but they certainly also had luck on their side in the process of doing it as well."
One would swear that understanding that sentence requires a 200IQ and 20 years of contemplation.
Just read your post M, the best summary of Board activity I have read in all these years. There is a difference between attacking and responding to an attack, sometimes hard to see as things escalate.
"You bunch of hypocrites make me sick.
Excellent post Mpower"
Except for the irony of him missing his own hypocrisy...and he's no saint either...and that's fine...I will also welcome him back after a long absence...we're all full of it at times...actually most of the time.
" Except for the irony of him missing his own hypocrisy.." DB what is my hypocrisy?
You hand out just as much as what you accuse others of doing...and you take a difference of opinion as a personal insult...or backstab...and you love pointing fingers yourself...and that's fine...keeps the board vibrant.
Mpuff you fucking pathetic hypocrite - fuck off you pathetic loser
Buttplug I’m going to ask you nicely to please refrain from calling me stupid until you get to a point where you display an acceptable level of intelligence because fuck me you are fucking dumb cunt - you can’t point fingers if setting an example is beyond you
Profound stupidity = you telling us that us genuine Bok supporters can’t seem to grasp the fact that the odd bit of luck is involved in rugby - we get that you stupid plank
Difference is, fuckwits like Moffie put all 3 one point WC wins and the WC itself down to luck to the point that the useless cunt has renamed our coach Dr Lucky - do you spot the difference plank?
Huh?
Now do us a favour and shut the fuck up and stop pointing fingers until you have developed enough credibility to do as much
You are a fucking embarrassment
And let’s not forget Rooi’s hypocrisy while we’re at it.
Those game threads last season, usually kicked off promptly by me or Pakie, were about as collegiate as you could ask for. Rooi was the first one to bring negativity to those threads.
Moz called it out back then, and rightly so. I used the term collegiate above because that's exactly the phrasing Moz used when he called Rooi out for it.
Now we find out that one tiny comment had the darling quivering and stomping his feet like a toddler denied his toy.
This is the same clown who posts twenty bits of empty banter, normally nasty, for every one rugby-related thought. The same creep who lurks in the shadows, waiting for one of his “enemies” to slip up so he can pounce, something we’ve exposed time and again.
And of course, the moment Rooi reappears, Dawie comes crawling, desperate for a friend after humiliating himself beyond recovery of late. So he hops aboard the victim bandwagon, hand in hand with RooiNuts.
Haha, you absolute jokers.
"Saying there was more luck involved than there would have been had the Boks won each game by more than 20 points...that's way too philosophical a statement for his Neanderthal brain."
And then, as if we didn't already have all the proof we need that this moron and his binary caveman brain, along with his child-like emotional intelligence, is incapable of even base level nuanced thought, he makes this post...
"Profound stupidity = you telling us that us genuine Bok supporters can’t seem to grasp the fact that the odd bit of luck is involved in rugby - we get that you stupid plank"
It's fine by me if you wish to continue making an embarrassment of yourself, Fatty. I'll fuel that train all the way into oblivion for you. I know you're dumb enough to keep buying a ticket. As you were on the "infer" thread.
You know what, Draad? Don’t come here acting like you’re some fair, balanced peacemaker.
You joined forces with that loudmouth Rooinek to take shots at me, and now you’re pretending to be neutral? That hypocrisy stinks.
Let me make this crystal clear…..I don’t “hand out” for fun or because someone disagrees with me. I respond when I get attacked or lied to.
There’s a massive difference. If someone starts swearing, insulting, or trying to smear me, like this gem from your buddy Saffolk:
“Mpuff you fucking pathetic hypocrite - fuck off you pathetic loser."
Then yeah, I’ll fight back. You expect me to sit quietly while that sewer rat runs his mouth? Not a chance.
So don’t twist it around like I’m the problem here. I debate different opinions all the time and I enjoy it when it’s done with a shred of respect.
But when it turns into personal abuse and filth, that’s when I take it personally and rightfully so.
So here’s the deal: tell me exactly where I supposedly took a “difference of opinion” personally, or stop spouting rubbish.
I’ve got no time for fence-sitters who talk about “vibrancy” while turning a blind eye to the real poison on this board.
And as for you Saffolk, you filthy- Fat clown, you can keep barking from your cold little cave in England.
You’re a fake, a fraud, and a coward hiding behind your keyboard and swear words. You’ve got nothing to say about rugby, so you resort to personal abuse because that’s all you’ve got left.
How about making another fucking stupid list of players, that help Fucking nobody……!!
You two want to throw stones? Fine. But don’t cry when someone throws them back twice as hard ….
I certainly have and will continue to respond to attacks, in kind. Sometimes these attacks have a long fuse, so it’s hard to discern who the aggressor is. But I repeat, I will be friends with anybody who is friendly with me, even if we disagree on issues….I don’t come on here to make my life more confrontational.
So how do I explain Dave. We have had periods of peace and periods of conflict. They don’t start with me, they usually start because I am supposedly a rugby apostate…..I don’t conform with the gospel according to St Erasmus. That doesn’t progress to content debate….the next post is an insult, very often exhorting me to F-off.
It doesn’t bother me, but I do then feel free to respond, if not in kind, I couldn’t stoop that low, at least in intent.
To be honest I don’t know if this place would be as much fun without the occasional injection of vitriol. So I’m not calling for it to end completely, but keep it within the guard rails of acceptability and the confidentiality we need to post here.
The Games of the 11th RWC are just beginning.
Spot on again M. Draad willl condemn others for being aggressive and yet the foul mouthed Mike completely avoids his scrutiny. There’s a lot of convenient outrage
Buttplug what part of shut up are you unable to grasp
You only have the right to point fingers when you set the intellectual standard
You are so fucking far off that mark it’s embarrassing so I’ll say it again
Shut the fuck up you plank
Lol ok, but wait I'm still inferring things based on my own implications
RTFFLMAOAYSF
Moffie we know you are a bare faced liar but here’s one more to add to your list
I start the insults against you - stop fucking lying, the insults are initiated by you - I just respond in kind
I treat you with disdain as you have reached an unacceptable level of discrediting this current Bok side’s achievements, the players and in particular the coach
Its both an insult and disgrace that you proclaim to support the Boks - fuck off, you are nothing more than a parasite to our beloved Boks
We don’t need you and they certainly don’t
Do you secretly hope the Boks lose every game they play so that you can point childish fingers at Rassie and the likes of DA, PSDT, Kolisi, Kitshoff, Lood, Malherbe, Thomas, Wessels etc huh?
Wooooosh for Buttplug and the inferring
Unbelievable but at least it looks like you have shut the fuck up when it comes to the finger pointing, dumberbutt
Well done you are making progress - seems you are capable of listening and learning
Oooh look at Mpuff get all red faced and blood shot - poor little thing
Watch that blood pressure you cute little thing
Here is a fact - I contribute on a rugby level more than most on here so fuck off you lying cunt
I throw abuse at you lot because you cunts deserve nothing less. The disrespect, the devaluing and the utter ignorant bullshit thrown at our Boks achievements, its players and in particular the coach is unacceptable and beyond tolerance
You anti Boks deserve all the insults you get and I’ll be at the front of the queue handing them out
Keyboard warrior you say - fuck off you little weed I’d be more than happy to hand you a fucking hiding anyday
"Spot on again M. Draad willl condemn others for being aggressive and yet the foul mouthed Mike completely avoids his scrutiny. There’s a lot of convenient outrage"
I condemned nobody, just pointed out that M is doing the same thing he accuse others of...I even said I'm fine with that...
And M, I've never teamed up with Rudehole against you...that's your thin skinned perception of things...and you're dead wrong. Rudehole is by far the poster I disagree with the most...it's not even close...and I don’t do the gang up thing at all...I'm a team player kinda person, but this attack pack mentality p!$$es me off big time.
And Moz, your main gripe with me is probably that I refuse to get on the "Let's constantly complain about Ou Maaik" bandwagon...you better get used to it...I'll explain it to you lot some day...I'm actually surprised you haven't figured it out...and no, no relation and I don’t interact with him in any way outside this board.
Jirre okes, what is going on? It's like The Real Housewives of Pretoria in here.
"You know what, Draad? Don’t come here acting like you’re some fair, balanced peacemaker. I'm not, that's in your head.
You joined forces with that loudmouth Rooinek to take shots at me, and now you’re pretending to be neutral? That hypocrisy stinks. Jou verbeelding
Let me make this crystal clear…..I don’t “hand out” for fun or because someone disagrees with me. I respond when I get attacked or lied to. Yes, you attack when someone disagrees with you and get personal.
There’s a massive difference. If someone starts swearing, insulting, or trying to smear me, like this gem from your buddy Saffolk:
“Mpuff you fucking pathetic hypocrite - fuck off you pathetic loser." Where did I complain about that? and what has that got to do with me?
Then yeah, I’ll fight back. You expect me to sit quietly while that sewer rat runs his mouth? Not a chance. Where have I ever said you shouldn't
So don’t twist it around like I’m the problem here. I debate different opinions all the time and I enjoy it when it’s done with a shred of respect. I never said you were the problem.
But when it turns into personal abuse and filth, that’s when I take it personally and rightfully so.
So here’s the deal: tell me exactly where I supposedly took a “difference of opinion” personally, or stop spouting rubbish.
I’ve got no time for fence-sitters who talk about “vibrancy” while turning a blind eye to the real poison on this board.
And as for you Saffolk, you filthy- Fat clown, you can keep barking from your cold little cave in England.
You’re a fake, a fraud, and a coward hiding behind your keyboard and swear words. You’ve got nothing to say about rugby, so you resort to personal abuse because that’s all you’ve got left.
How about making another fucking stupid list of players, that help Fucking nobody……!!
You two want to throw stones? Fine. But don’t cry when someone throws them back twice as hard ….
I don't have time to do this on my phone, and I've lost interest...IMO you take things way too seriously...anyway whatever blows your hair back...
“Keyboard warrior you say - fuck off you little weed I’d be more than happy to hand you a fucking hiding anyday"
Ag sure like I haven’t heard that one before:)
"Jirre okes, what is going on? It's like The Real Housewives of Pretoria in here."
Brakpan ;)
Wanneer laas was jy in Brakpan Plum?...I actually know people from Brakpan...peculiar lot..:-)
I will never share how many of my relatives live there, Draad! Never!!!
Can't be that bad...
Oh please, Draad, stop acting like you’re the voice of reason here, you’re dodging every point I made.
You did join forces with Rooinek to have a go at me. You might not admit it, but it did happen. Moz still told you to choose your allies wisely. Don’t play dumb.
And now, when I call you out, you hide behind this “I never said that” routine.
Typical fence-sitting, pretend to be neutral while sliding little digs in between the lines.
As for taking things “too seriously” no, I take respect seriously. There’s a difference.
You shrug off filthy personal attacks like the one from your mate Saffolk because it’s convenient for you.
You say you “never complained” yeah, because it wasn’t aimed at you. Easy to be calm when someone else is taking the abuse, right?
I don’t start fights, I finish them. I debate rugby with anyone who actually wants to talk rugby.
But when people like Saffolk crawl out the gutter with their insults, I’ll respond accordingly.
So stop pretending I’m the one who can’t handle opinions, I handle plenty.
What I won’t handle is cheap shots and disrespect from hypocrites who think silence makes them superior.
And Saffolk, since you love lists so much here is one for you:
Dunno, I've never been haha
You take respect seriously, but yet act disrespectful when it suits you...
That's exactly the right name for Dawie.
A fake.
Mpuff Draad is giving you a hiding
May I suggest you shut the fuck up to save face
There you go again, Draad, twisting words to sound clever while dodging the point.
I give respect until it’s thrown in my face. When I’m disrespected, I’ll respond in kind, that’s not hypocrisy, that’s standing up for myself.
You claim I’m “disrespectful when it suits me”? Then show me one example where I attacked someone without being attacked first. Go on, just one. You can’t, because it doesn’t exist.
What’s actually happening is that you don’t like it when I give back as good as I get. You call it “disrespect” because it doesn’t fit your soft, sit-on-the-fence routine.
So stop pretending you’re above it all, you’re not. You’re just another poster trying to look noble while taking sly digs from the sidelines.
You want to talk about respect? Then start practicing it yourself instead of preaching it….
I condemned nobody, just pointed out that M is doing the same thing he accuse others of...I even said I'm fine with that...
Actually no, M is not doing what the likes of Porker and Pompus do……attack other posters without personal provocation. He is responding to filthy attacks from both those worthies and, yes, Mike.
And it took several levels of personal attacks for him to respond. He is a collaborative poster on here to share his rugby views, Pompus is here to humiliate others and Porker is on here to try to dominate the discourse.
Eventually other posters respond and you can’t see the difference.
As for the scandalous comments about Brakpan, being from Springs myself I can confirm the Benoni wives are the real deal.
Moz, I've never once lost my temper with M and insiulted him personaly...yet he k@ks in his panties every time I dare to disagree with him...I admire your loyalty, but he looks for trouble and complains like an oumatjie when he gets some...deliberately steps in dog poo and then complains about the stench. Drama queen.
Oooh look at Moffie being the innocent Good Samaritan - fuck off old man
You wish, Draad. You’ve been hiding behind that calm-act for years while stirring from the sidelines.
If disagreeing with me means twisting my words, taking cheap digs and then pretending you’re innocent, don’t be surprised when I call it out.
I don’t “k@k my panties” , I just don’t tolerate BS. You dish it out, then play the saint when it bounces back.
That’s why I called you a fence-sitter: always pretending to be neutral while throwing sly shots from the shadows.
So keep your little psychology lessons to yourself, professor. I see straight through the act
M, you're full of sh!t, spare me the lecture...extrapolating outside the facts leads to erroneous conclusions...
Mpuff you dumb twat Draad is one of the good guys on here
Wake the fuck up are you really this dumb and insecure?
Draad, you keep saying I’m “full of shit” or “extrapolating,” but the simple truth is this, I react to what’s actually happening.
When someone takes little digs or sides with those throwing personal and defaming insults, I’m going to notice it.
You try to stay neutral, and that’s fine, but the big problem is when that “neutral” position turns into quietly backing the people causing the toxic chaos.
That’s why I’ve said it really looks like you are fence-sitting and it’s starting to look fake…It’s not about disagreeing, it’s about consistency.
I’ve always liked you, and I still do, but when I see sly digs coming my way and you pretending it’s nothing, that’s when I start losing that respect.
I debate straight, I don’t stab from the shadows.
And as for the other noise from the peanut gallery, ( The Fat Clown) it’s not even worth a reply.
Mpuff what a dumb cunt you are
"When someone takes little digs or sides with those throwing personal and defaming insults, I’m going to notice it."
Explain to me where I have defamed you.
I’m guessing the stupid prick thinks you are siding with me
As dumb as
You see, Draad, this is exactly what I’ve been talking about.
Look at that reply from your buddy Saffolk: “Mpuff what a dumb cunt you are.”
That’s what you’re defending, whether you mean to or not. You say you’re all about keeping things balanced and civil, but when you turn a blind eye to this kind of filth, or worse, side with it, you’re putting yourself in the same camp.
There’s no excuse for backing a guy who adds nothing but personal abuse.
This is the lowest level of discourse on the board, and it drags everyone down. If you can’t call it out, at least don’t enable it.
I’ve respected you, and I’ve tried to keep the rugby talk going, but this kind of behaviour proves my point about fence-sitting.
You can’t play neutral while standing next to someone like that , people will judge you by the company you keep.
If more of us stopped giving Fat clowns like him relevance and just ignored the rubbish, he’d fade into obscurity where he fucking belongs!!
Real respect isn’t about keeping quiet, it’s about standing up for what’s right!!
Mpuff why are you such a crybaby - do you wear a nappy? Have you lost your dummy?
Serious questions
giMp (aka Alucard, aka Lestat, aka JeromeV, aka Aristocat, aka Apollo13, aka Ek, aka Machiavelli, aka Sun-Tzu, aka Lurker, aka Username, aka Requiescat, aka carpetmuncher, aka mambo etc.) . . .
Here is something I said to you over 10 years ago . . . check the date:
RooinekHall Of Famer
16,079 posts
Nov 22, 2014, 13:25
Wehe, just how stupid must LeTwat / Dim Sum think we all are to believe he wasn't Gonzo the Gimp as well?
Out of interest, has anyone else ever had their Ruckersforum account "breached" or "destroyed" or is Dim Gimp the only one? Sounds like a load of rubbish to me.
My own experience of Dim Gimp is that he spouts a huge amount of opinionated nonsense until he gets exposed as a complete idiot who knows absolutely nothing about rugby (an example being his statement that a flyhalf's only job is to decide who to pass to) and then, once his credibility is destroyed he runs away to sulk for a few weeks only to come slinking back with a new disguise which usually only lasts for one post because everyone immediately knows there is only one person on the planet who could possibly have that much hatred for Patrick Lambie . . . and then the cycle starts again.
Now that was more than 10 years ago and you'd already used about 30 different identities or nom de plumes at that stage. Since then you've probably tripled that number again . . . Mpower, Mr McAllister, Doos XL, Augenoffner, Desert Fool and too many others to mention.
Nothing has changed all these years later. Ten years on and you're still just a pathetic weak little loser who bursts into tears every few months, runs away snivelling and then comes back with a new name, hoping no-one will notice and who then gets all tearful and red-faced when exposed
I mean, really, how insecure and weak do you have to be to use nearly 100 different logins?
And then, to top it all, you've started interacting with yourself on the board (Mpower and Mr McAllister being a recent example). How pathetic is that? Just how big a loser are you really?
I know you'll deny it, you always do . . . but you know that I know your giveaways, don't you?
LMAO!
There are some serious losers on this board but Doos tops the list with Buttplug a close second
Not worth fucking feeding
Oh and apparently you have never exposed Moffie for any spelling or grammatical errors, they’ve all been typos lol
Hilarious…..Porker’s salvation Pompus, who is supposed to document my grammatical and spelling errors, brings back the string documenting one of his many embarrassing goofs ….his nick at the time Pompus, earned for butchering the spelling of pompous.
ROFL!
‘You try to stay neutral, and that’s fine, but the big problem is when that “neutral” position turns into quietly backing the people causing the toxic chaos’
Fair question Draad, I can’t remember once when you clearly backed somebody other than Mike or yourself when our two low class Board thugs went beyond acceptable behaviour.
Cry me a river - Moffie are you inferring you are high class - bwaaahaaaahaaa
Fucking stupid old man
No ….just that you are low class. And the word is implying moron.
Glad you're back Rooi ... how was the So'E concert ?
"Fair question Draad, I can’t remember once when you clearly backed somebody other than Mike or yourself when our two low class Board thugs went beyond acceptable behaviour."
I don't back Maaik that much, I just refuse to p!$$ and kerm about him all the time...I try to play the ball, not the man...I disagree with a lot of Maaiks ideas...I have complained about how some treat ou Maaik, but I don't do that much either these...it doesn't help...
Getoutahere, he gives as good as he gets .
Yes Bob, I know and he deserves what's coming his way, but I just made a choice not to take part in it.
I know, its like Saarkie's tale about the scorpion & frog (not a fox, S, not a fox).
Rooinek what nonsense are you spouting?? I joined at the end of 2021 and have only been Mpower.
I DO NOT feel the need to change my poster name or hide behind a new one.
Besides you have to be really stupid not to see that my style of writing is totally different to that of Mcallister, Deus Ex Lemur, Augenoffner etc.etc.etc.
Yet another example of you only coming on here to cause kak and then wanting to play the victim….
But hey think whatever a loser thinks, idiot!!
Indeed, old RooiNuts is smoking the good stuff
Moffie the only thing you are is lying fucking scum - low class would be crediting you with something
Pompus Poirot crashes and burns again….hahaha….not the best return to the Board. It was heart wrenching to hear how he was devastated by my telling him match threads were there for insights. The poor lad has none….better at contributions like ‘he missed the conversion’.
And now, for umpteenth time he plays Board Detective and gets it all wrong. Nice smack down M
So now the Deep Dive Resumed?
How did you work out I crashed and burnt Moffie - is it because you said so huh?
Provide the evidence you lying scum
Oh dear……Pompus is your good mate Rooi, who earned that title by misspelling ‘pompous’ You know the fellow you thought schooled me in English.
Now this must be very embarrassing. Unless of course you are M and Mr McCallister, hahahaha. Pompus and Porkie the Board board buffoons.
Moffie we know Rooi has exposed you for making spelling and grammatical errors - do you want me to ask him?
Because I know for a FACT you are lying you pathetic hypocrite
You know nothing….you wouldn’t know a grammatical error if it hit you in the face, you uneducated buffoon. But don’t cloak your need for help in a question….just admit you can’t find anything.
No Moffie I have not searched as I don’t know how to but I’ll keep it simple and ask Rooi as he will no doubt have loads of examples of your pathetic hypocrisy you lying twat
Im looking forward to this
Smiling as I type
The ultimate humiliation crying for help.
Don’t kid yourself Moffie there is zero humiliation.
Its just handy that Rooi has returned as he and I will take great pleasure in him exposing you for the pathetic sad hypocritical old man that you are
Fuck I’m looking forward to it
I would tell Dumbo how to search...but I once posted full instructions that a retarded child could follow on how to post pics here, and it was too much for him.
lol he gave up in the end.
Bwhahahaha!
Don’t lie you fucking cunt I posted a picture and it was’nt thanks to your poorly set out instructions
Fcn amazing!
It’s ‘fucken’ Draad - come on you can say it
You a grammar/$spelling Nazi now too also?
No I want you to say ‘fucking’ or ‘fucken’ not the abbreviated version
Imagine trying to find evidence as a lawyer, when you can't even search an online forum for archived text.....
LMFAO ....
True story
How about fokken?
9.5 out of 10 for effort Draad
"Don’t lie you fucking cunt I posted a picture and it was’nt thanks to your poorly set out instructions"
You mean these clearly set out instructions that a child could follow?
Haha these are apparently bad instructions.
Can we please have a round of a applause for the only person on Ruckers that would not be able to follow these instructions.
Haha the mega-plonker that is Dawie continues to expose himself for the dullard that he is.
14,057 posts
Looks wet. Blegh.