Wehe . . . the most biased and prejudiced poster on the board presenting his "less biased" and ignorant view.
LMAO!
Wehe . . . the most biased and prejudiced poster on the board presenting his "less biased" and ignorant view.
LMAO!
Agree Moz….the Saints was playing very well today and deserved the win.
The Bulls did create opportunities, but was forcing to much and couldn’t Capitalise…..
Hanekom is Playing some good Rugby. Louw and Steenekamp were of there game….
They will be back next time.
I see . . . so you guys are giving Joke White a free pass because the other team played well?
LMAO!
Why didn't the Springbok-laden Bulls play well? Because they have a crap coach is why.
Mozart
With repect the Bulls made twice as many handling rrors than Northampton did. That indicates poor skils developent by he coch. The Bulls made to many penalized errors as well. And the whole attacking pattern of the uls were preditctable making defense easier,
Sure Northmpton played better rugby than te Bulls but continuus faulty play and making the sme mistakes all the time represents real BS/
No it indicates the Bools defense wasn’t as intense….the handling errors came because the Saints defense was so quick. The Bools ball movement was actually quite sophisticated.
The skills is there, but the players couldn’t capitalise on field today.
It’s easy blaming it all on the coach, especially because of bias viewpoints.
The other SA Franchises is not doing that much better and to single out the bulls is not based on facts, but Bias dislike….Kindergarten:)
Not singling out the Bulls only - have you seen what I wrot about the Stormers and Sharks?
"The Bulls with 9 Springboks in their starting XV and home ground advantage have to be the worst coached team in world rugby. " and the thread titled - " The worst coached team in the world “
If that is not going a bit overboard to single out Jake and the bulls, then I must be mistaken?!
Somre of Bulls players never played for the Springboks coached by Erasmus. But of the present Bulls coming from the Springbok team was top class - especially Hanekom I believe the main problem is that the coachig environment under Erasmus may cause problems
You think Erasmus’ coaching environment is the problem…. Seems a bit harsh.
or Mozarrt
T coching envionment of erasmus is a class above anybody else in S - but the coaching on faachie level is not and the three coaches of he Buls, Sharks and Stormers are BS supreme. The Bulls were given endless money to spend on player recruitment and they fucked up royally. That is why Rupert and Motepe appointed Bris to protect their rugby interests and it would become clear that he may be disastisfied with what is happening in the case of te Bulls in particular.
In the case of the Sormers there unde judicial managment a present andrun by SARU when it comes to fundng and expenditure - functions Erasms is not involved in.. the tem th seleced was weeird and in the man they were not playing their best players on Saturday. I fact it was a team of payes that iclded unknown player - while players like Sacha and Malnerbe was available to lay. The tem w captined byMoerat - one of th worst locks in S who cannot even jump i line-outs and tackled going back in tackles by baackline players.
Thi coming Sruday h Bulls is playing the Sharks in a UC match and the Stroemers are playing the Lions. - it would eb interesting to se what ahppens in those two maches,
Wow Moz you really do not know your rugby at all
Elrigh Louw was huge - fuck me the power the lad showed was amazing - what bloody game were you watching
What the fuck did Steenkamp do wrong in that game? He has already proven himself as a Bok
Seriously what rugby are you watching
What I see is a really talented group of players with no direction in the past 2 games - wonder why that is - good old Jake has run out of ideas and more than likely pissed the players off
They look like an unhappy side playing poor rugby
Dave it’s over 20 years since Jake first coached the Boks….what other coach from 2003 is still coaching at this level? If he has run out of ideas it wouldn’t be surprising…later successful coaches like Gatland and Schmidt are struggling to be effective.
The Bulls looked far better last season - their last two games have been really really poor
Well two weeks ago this Bools team beat Connacht away by 28 points to 14….is this team so much better than the one that played for the Sharks on Saturday:
15Willie Le Roux, - | ||
14Canan Moodie, - | ||
13David Kriel, - | ||
12Harold Vorster, - | ||
11Sebastian de Klerk, - | ||
10Johan Goosen, - 4 | ||
9Embrose Papier, - | ||
1Alulutho Tshakweni, - | ||
2Akker van der Merwe, - | ||
3Francois Klopper, - | ||
4Ruan Vermaak, - | ||
5JF van Heerden, - | ||
6Marcell Coetzee, -
Dec 16, 2024, 18:15
Yes it’s far better than the Sharks side that played on the weekend
Dec 16, 2024, 18:48
Give us your player by player analysis,
Dec 16, 2024, 18:58
Ah shit I’ve just realised that the Bulls side you have listed is not the Bulls side from the weekend My bad
Dec 16, 2024, 20:33
No it was the Bulls side that beat Connacht….the point being despite missing some top players they were still able to win big away. There was a red card to each team….net 35 minute man advantage to the Bools, worth 5 of the 14 point differential.
Dec 16, 2024, 20:42
Then one has to ask why it has fallen so flat in the last two games when the side is better than the one that played against Connacht
Dec 16, 2024, 21:14
But Northampton played well. You all keep overlooking that fact.
Dec 16, 2024, 21:18
They played well when it counted but the Bulls looked the dominant side who had themselves to blame for all their errors That Bulls side on a normal day would have put that Saints side to bed I do like the way the Saints sides attacks - those backs play well together and Randall at 9 was very good
Dec 16, 2024, 21:26
Mitchell at 9, you mean.
Dec 16, 2024, 21:32
Yes Mitchell - good player
Dec 16, 2024, 21:37
Ha ha ha ! Randall plays for Bristol.
Dec 16, 2024, 21:39
Yeah I’m a bit shit with the English player names - I have no love for them just you :)
Dec 16, 2024, 21:46
You are rubbish Awwww.
You need to Log in to reply.
Your Opinion
|
44,433 posts
I see the usual anti Jake posters are on about how poorly coached the Bools are. They aren’t. The Saints played exceptionally well and their defense, the big difference, was playing at test level intensity.
The Bools actually created a lot of opportunities, but perhaps tried to force the last pass. And clearly the defense was poor. The last try, for example, which the dumb commentator tried to blame on Moody was actually just an overlap, the defense didn’t shift.
Hanekom was obviously very good but I am left wondering if Elrigh Louw and Steenekamp are the real deal.