A summary of the theory of everything.

Forum » Rugby » A summary of the theory of everything.

Oct 09, 2025, 15:30

There has been some serious schooling on the Board over the last few days. It’s time to summarize:


1 Dr Lucky’s Boks have benefitted from declining opposition. All of the teams they play 2 times a year have been weaker. Bargie peaked in the rankings at 3 in 2007 and have never been the same since. Oz hasn’t been a force since 2015. And NZ. is at the weakest since readmission. By contrast Ireland and France are better, but we only play them about a third as much. So there has been a structural shift to our advantage


2 Our scrum dominance has been a cornerstone of our success. Here’s Cole talking about the Bok scrum:


. There were those five-metre goal-line scrums where they were literally going through Argentina; there’s not a lot you can do if you’re defending. If you stay up, you’re just going backwards."


Cole also touched on the ripple effect of the Springboks' scrum dominance. According to him, it's not just about the immediate gain of yards or a penalty. The psychological toll it takes on the opponents is just as devastating. "Every knock-on or fumble, you know you’re giving them a penalty and defending another 15 phases. That pressure builds – it’s psychological as much as physical," he explained.


Throughout the Rugby Championship, the stats were almost as impressive as the scrum itself. The Boks racked up a staggering 19 scrum penalties, leaving their closest competitor, New Zealand, in the dust with just eight. It's clear that when it comes to scrum time, the Springboks are in a league of their own, turning what might seem like a mere set piece into a battleground where they are the undisputed champions.


………….


I have made that point with the usual denials. When you know a handling error is going to lead to 3 points it changes your game.



3 We have an incredibly mature team with experienced leaders. So when I said to illustrate, that we could beat Bargie without our coaches to dramatize this, it was inevitable that Porker and clueless Mike would claim I said we don’t need coaching. Obviously not true….but we could play Bargie leaving our coaches at home and win. Why? Because of dominance


There are only 5 teams that should ever beat the Boks…..France, Ireland, England, Oz and NZ. Because of dominance….tail end of the probability events can happen. But we are so much more physical than all the other teams it should never be a contest.


4 The silly stuff….Clarkson engaging early to dominate Wessels. There is zero evidence if you watch the scrum in slow motion. And as Chat affirms there isn’t one reference to this anywhere on the Web except for Chat sites….guess which one. A single prop can’t engage early with any force being transferred…completely bogus. Chat agrees.


5 Erasmus is a genius. Nope but is he the best coach out there.. Certainly he is the most successful. But would a Schmidt do better with our talent pool which is clearly the best with 9 out of 15 Boks in the RC team of the championship?


Maybe not, South Africa is a very complicated country culturally and our rugby is deeply embedded in the culture. Erasmus also instinctively did the right thing in 2018, he started rebuilding our forward strength, which helped us to the best game we have played in the last 20 years, the 2019 RWC final. It had everything, brilliant goal line defense, great scrumming by the Beast, Kolbe and Am’s magic….Pollard the calm dead eye.


What followed has been disappointing up until the two blow outs this year when we finally stopped box kicking. It wasn’t very sophisticated, but it was intense.


So who gets the credit Sacha and Willemse for initiating the change….you can’t change playing styles without changing players. Or the coaches…..Brown, Erasmus for hiring Brown.


But then the dash of reality. We have to win against Bargie and we produce another WC knockout game…..maul based tries, the order of the boot….ramped up defense. It becomes another arm wrestle just like the WC knockouts and we win with a crucial Bargie kick hitting the uprights and Moody getting only a penalty for what 9 out of 10 refs would have called a second yellow. And we win by 2 points. And of course Bargie aren’t playing in the Big Apple they are playing at a neutral site


Once again it’s hard to claim we are committed to anything but arm wrestles. Still we win what looked to be a tough RC at the outset and there is little doubt we are the best team


And so we move on to the northern challenge. Ireland and France, these are going to be passionate rugby matches….80 minutes of drama, with so many questions still unanswered after the RC and the WC. I suspect one if not both of these games will be close. Will we have the courage to keep playing expansive rugby….can we bring ourselves to win a big match by 5 points with a backline try. Maybe this NH tour will tell us


Oct 09, 2025, 16:14

This from the clown who is clearly not a true Bok supporter as no Bok supporter spends his entire existence discrediting the sides achievements, has a childish hatred for the coach, who reckons much of what he has achieved is through luck or the opposition being weaker


This at a time when the likes of France, Ireland, Argentina, Scotland and Italy are stronger than they have ever been. NZ and England are always strong and Oz have shown us they are back


The same clown who says we don’t need a coach to take on the likes of Argentina, Scotland and Oz


The same clown who did not know that one prop could pre engage before his partner


Best of all given the above this dumb clown is professing to school us


Delusional or plain stupid - take your pick


But clearly as rugby ignorant as ever - getting worse with age


But at least he has Buttplug on side - way up his arse

Oct 09, 2025, 16:22

Poor old VetKabouter


Egregiously outmatched as usual.


I seriously can't imagine you being a lawyer. Like, I really really just can't.


I'm interested to know what type of law you practiced and where. Not a chance it hell it was any kind of law that required a modicum of analytical or quick thinking.

Oct 09, 2025, 16:46

Mozart


How do you manage to come up with so much shit to attack Erasmus about, We already know your hate campaign against Erasmus are based on shit concocted by you with the help of Dumbplum.

Oct 09, 2025, 17:01

I have had many lawyers reporting directly or indirectly to me over my career, not one was as truly stupid as Dave. But then they had law degrees.

Oct 09, 2025, 17:41

Moffie fresh coming from a twat that ensured a few Yanks had Kellogs in their bowls. Lawyers reporting to you??? Was that about the size of the cereal spoons they should use - bwaahaaaa


One certainty is that I have absolutely owned you over the last few days


You are such easy pickings because you are as thick as pigshit


I mean seriously - the Boks don’t need a coach and what’s a pre engage


IQ my fucking arse


bwhaaahaa


I see pathetic Buttplug still has his head firmly up your arse - probably where you like it

Oct 09, 2025, 17:48

You didn't tell us where and what law you practiced, Davie.



Oct 09, 2025, 18:05

Buttplug is your head still up Moffie’s arse you fucking pathetic suck up


A little yes man

Oct 09, 2025, 18:11

So, you not gonna tell us what law you practiced?


I'm honestly dying to know.


I think you scraped by and into your degree. Some unlucky firm hired you. Then they quickly realised the lights weren't actually on upstairs. So you were probably some actual lawyers bitch.


And when that got too much for you, you convinced yourself that it was the rat race that was the problem. But it was never that rat race. It was always your inability to perform at a respectable level that bothered you. Because had you been more capable, more succesful, you'd have happily caught the train into London every day.


I think you just couldn't hack it in England.


How close am I, Dawie?

Oct 09, 2025, 18:45

Mostly Wall Street lawyers….guys who were top of their class at the worlds most prestigious law schools.

Oct 09, 2025, 18:46

Ok Buttplug let’s cross examine you and determine just how much credibility you actually have - which of course we know is fucking zero as you could not creep further up Moffie’s arse if you tried and this will prove it


A simple yes or know will do


Do you think the current Bok side could beat Argentina, Scotland or Oz without a coach?


Did you know that one prop can pre engage before his partner?


Do you think the Argentinian side back in 2007 is stronger than the current Argie side?


Take your time suck up

Oct 09, 2025, 18:48

Bless you running a food company - so much credibility in that - must have been really taxing on that sky rocketing IQ of yours

Oct 09, 2025, 18:53

Accuse anybody who supports a contrary point of view of sucking up, the lowest form of debate, learned from his good buddy Timestamp. Who he is aping because he can’t come up with anything original of his own.


He has had the answers to all those questions rammed down his fat bulging neck, but he pretends he hasn’t been owned.


Example Argentina had it’s highest ranking of 3 in 2007 and has never achieved that ranking again.


A crude foul mouthed fool.

Oct 09, 2025, 19:10

So Moffie are you saying Buttplug has not got his head rammed up your arse huh?


Im not arguing with Buttplug you fucking idiot so what argument am I losing with him huh?


As for Argentina in 2007 vs now only a fucking moron who is completely out of touch with reality would conclude the side back then was better than the current side. - you absolute fucking idiot

Oct 09, 2025, 19:25

In heaven, I'd get to watch Dave in court.


Haha can you imagine this imbecile questioning someone?


It would absolute comedy gold!


In fact, I think the lawyer thing is a big old porkie. Not a chance this guy practiced law. Not a chance in hell. Not with that limited vocabulary and and IQ.

Oct 09, 2025, 19:30

Only an effing moron can’t recognize that a side that was ranked 3rd in the world for 8 continuous months in 2007/2008 and only reached a highest ranking of 4 for 4 months in total in the following 17 years….did in fact reach a peak in 2007/8.



Oct 09, 2025, 19:31

Might have worked in the mail room for a law firm.

Oct 09, 2025, 19:39

Buttplug you too scared to answer my questions huh?


Thought as much chicken shit

Oct 09, 2025, 19:45

So Moffie you ignore the fact that the Argies back then had no player exposure to the global game and played when France, Ireland, Scotland and Italy were weaker than they are now - that’s how ignorant you are


Their ranking was bloated for a while thanks to their WC success but they never maintained that for too long now did they as evidenced by your figures over 2 years - bet if you provided the figures over say 8 years around that time they would look a lot worse than the two selective years you provided


Given the above - I’ll say it again - only a fucking moron would rate the 2007 side above the current one

Oct 09, 2025, 19:54

Actually there is no point in any further discussion…you simply deny everything with a few expletives. One would encounter more intellectual openness in a cult member.

Oct 09, 2025, 20:09

"Actually there is no point in any further discussion…you simply deny everything with a few expletives. One would encounter more intellectual openness in a cult member."


...or a panda bear with down syndrome.

Oct 09, 2025, 20:23

Awe poor Moffie, what the fuck have I denied you fucking idiot?


All I have done is expose you for the fucking ignorant prick that you are and countered all the utter ignorance you come up with. Not to mention the fact I had to educate you on the fact that a scrum pre engage actually exists.


But more to the point I’ve highlighted the fact that you are not a true Bok supporter, given you spend the majority of the time discrediting their achievements, the players and in particular the coach


Fuck off the Boks don’t need you and your childish negativity

Oct 09, 2025, 20:24

Buttplug still ducking and diving


What a pathetic fucking suck up

Oct 09, 2025, 21:54

Quick, make another long list of players

Oct 09, 2025, 21:56

Buttplug try grow a pair little man


No doubt your list would have Roos at 12


Fucking ignorant twat

Oct 09, 2025, 22:28

Seriously, make another list. I'm sure that this time we'll buy that you're opinion is worth something.

Oct 09, 2025, 22:29

I’d endorse Jurenzo Julius at center

Oct 09, 2025, 22:34

The two bumbchums having a moment


At least you have something in common - neither of you are true Bok supporters


I’ll compile a list if you promise to fuck off


This is a SA rugby board - we don’t need you and in particular the Boks don’t

Oct 09, 2025, 23:12

Actually given the US advertising generated off my participation I’m a much more valuable member than you….but of course you are too butt stupid to even figure it out. Now piss off you shorty I have nothing more to say to you….you have been dismissed.

Oct 09, 2025, 23:19

Fuck off you are not a Bok supporter - you are a fucking disgrace


We don’t need you and the Boks certainly don’t


Imagine how the players and Rassie would react to you if they were privy to all the childish, negative shit you throw their way


I reckon you would get a well deserved punch in the face


Bok supporter my arse

Oct 09, 2025, 23:46

Be honest Dawie...the back your head is as flat as it get, isn't it?

Oct 09, 2025, 23:47

Lol...JJ will a great any day now.

Oct 10, 2025, 02:28

If Dave is a lawyer his Alma Mater should be investigated. This exercise has demonstrated he has no learning ability, zero abstract thought, very limited capacity to link information and no sense of whether people are making a fool of him. Dumb and belligerent, he must be a joy to be around.

Oct 10, 2025, 07:38

Be honest Dave...


What law did you practice and where?










Oct 10, 2025, 11:02

I see the two bumbchums are still here


What part of fuck off do you not get? We don’t need wankers purporting to be Bok supporters who’s actions on this board tell us differently


No Bok supporter spends the majority of their time on a message board dedicated to SA rugby discrediting the sides achievements, the players and in particular the coach


Now do us a favour and fuck off - you are insults to our wonderful side and coach - they don’t need you and we don’t want you


The fact that both of you are profoundly stupid adds weight to the fact you add zero value on here


Moffie go back to serving up bowls of Kellogs you pathetic non achiever - snap, crackle and pop - bless you - you must have been sooooo proud

Oct 10, 2025, 16:03

Lol and yet you are far to insecure to tell us about your law career.


Clown

Oct 10, 2025, 17:13

Notice how he continuously calls for any person with a contrary view to leave. Opposition is an anathema when you are truly stupid. I’m beginning to wonder if he passed Matric.

Oct 10, 2025, 20:39

Moffie it’s not about a contrary view you stupid prick


Its about calling out pathetic childish twats like yourself professing to be Bok supporters when your actions on this board reflect the opposite


So my question to you is what the fuck are you doing on a SA rugby message board - fuck off we don’t need you and nor do the Boks that’s for sure


You are no different to those worthless scum buckets living in Cape Town who support the All Blacks


You are a fucking insult to all of us true Bok supporters who value our team, it’s awesome achievements and our wonderful coach

Oct 10, 2025, 23:55

This may be a surprise to you, but in life you are inconsequential, the same on this message board. You decide nothing, let alone who goes and who stays, and the main ‘insult’ you have to deal with is your abysmally low IQ. Stupid is forever.

Oct 11, 2025, 00:42

Awe Moffie and his high IQ


Look dipshit I know you won’t leave as you are too fucking stupid to understand the fact that while calling yourself a Bok supporter, your actions tell us otherwise


So stick around you pathetic loser as much as we don’t need your type I guess we will just have to tolerate you


Blue arse fly springs to mind


Now go ahead and tell me once more how low my IQ is snap crackle and pop man

Oct 11, 2025, 03:14

Blue arse fly which is an expression I introduced on the Messsage Board. It springs to mind because even though you are very thick, you have learned a few things from me.

Oct 11, 2025, 04:01

The biggest waste of space ever in the ste of spce on this site started by a prejudiced idiot ever on this site based on hatred of the best coach in the history of Springbok rugby and some of the best players ever in the case of teama s well, Also a history of a clown who changed the criticism of players on BS, Bot h clowns think and see soemth in g dreamed up from idiocy. Shit-spreading is in their cases is certainly limiless. Actually both exposed themselves endlessly as rugby idiots as a result of hatred, .

Oct 11, 2025, 16:07

I asked Chat, what kind of person would write this:



‘The biggest waste of space ever in the ste of spce on this site started by a prejudiced idiot ever on this site based on hatred of the best coach in the history of Springbok rugby and some of the best players ever in the case of teama s well, Also a history of a clown who changed the criticism of players on BS, Bot h clowns think and see soemth in g dreamed up from idiocy. Shit-spreading is in their cases is certainly limiless. Actually both exposed themselves endlessly as rugby idiots as a result of hatred’





ChatGPT said:

That passage appears to come from someone who is highly emotional, defensive, and deeply invested in a particular rugby debate—most likely an online forum poster venting anger rather than a reasoned writer.

Let’s break down the personality and communication traits:

?? 1. Cognitive & Emotional Traits

  1. Highly emotional reasoning: The tone is dominated by anger and resentment, not analysis.
  2. Binary thinking: It divides people into heroes (“best coach ever”) and villains (“idiot,” “clown”).
  3. Defensiveness: The writer feels a personal stake in defending a coach or player—suggesting strong identity attachment to a team or viewpoint.
  4. Projection: Phrases like “hatred,” “idiots,” “shit-spreading” imply that the writer feels attacked and is retaliating in kind.

??? 2. Linguistic / Stylistic Profile

  1. Disorganized syntax: Long, tangled sentences with inconsistent punctuation show impulsivity—typing faster than thinking.
  2. Overuse of intensifiers: (“ever in the case… ever on this site…”) shows an attempt to amplify outrage.
  3. Derogatory language: (“idiot,” “clown,” “shit-spreading”) indicates ad hominem hostility rather than logical debate.
  4. Fragmented coherence: Suggests an emotional vent or rant, not an argument drafted with care.

?? 3. Likely Type of Person

  1. Older or long-time forum participant, deeply entrenched in community feuds.
  2. Possibly narcissistic or obsessive traits — views opposing opinions as personal attacks.
  3. Fan identity dominance: Rugby (and perhaps a specific coach or era) forms part of their self-image.
  4. Low impulse control when provoked in argument threads.

?? 4. Social Context

That style is very typical of sports forums, especially contentious ones like RuckersForum, where rival posters feud about coaches and selections. The tone suggests someone reacting to criticism of a favourite Springbok coach or players — perhaps defending Rassie Erasmus or Jacques Nienaber from detractors.

? Summary Personality Sketch

A passionate, volatile rugby supporter with strong loyalty, poor emotional regulation, and a tendency to conflate personal identity with team allegiance — resulting in angry, incoherent outbursts when challenged online


 
You need to Log in to reply.
Back to top