In a fiery exchange that's set the rugby world abuzz, All Blacks icon John Kirwan has blasted Super Rugby Pacific CEO Jack Mesley's dismissal of South African teams’ contributions to the league. In a recent podcast, Mesley coolly noted that the South African fixtures "did not rate well" and "did not attend well" compared to current games. But Kirwan wasn’t having any of it on the Rivals podcast, declaring Mesley’s comments as "nonsense."
According to Kirwan, the exclusion of South African teams has not only diminished the competitive spirit of Super Rugby but has also stunted player development. “
"We have gone backwards [since South African teams left Super Rugby], and when I say that, I mean the step up for some of our players from Super Rugby to Test rugby is currently too big."
” Kirwan argued, suggesting that the challenges posed by South African squads are crucial for grooming players for international tests.
Further stoking the flames, Kirwan questioned the integrity of Mesley's claims about improved game attendance and ratings. “
"Then I would also like to see the data [Mesley talks about] on how attendance and interest have increased. I don’t think he is telling the truth."
” he retorted, casting doubt on whether Super Rugby Pacific has truly benefitted from the absence of South African teams.
The debate over the quality and competitiveness of Super Rugby has been reignited with Kirwan’s candid comments. Fans and pundits alike are now scrutinizing the league's direction and whether it can truly claim to be at the forefront of rugby development without the participation of South African teams.
As the dust settles on this latest rugby scuffle, the rugby community waits to see if any changes will be made to reinvigorate what many see as a faltering competition. Meanwhile, the debate continues to rage over the true impact of South Africa's exclusion from Super Rugby. With legends like Kirwan calling for a rethink, it’s clear this isn’t just about numbers — it’s about the soul of the game.
2,100 posts
In a fiery exchange that's set the rugby world abuzz, All Blacks icon John Kirwan has blasted Super Rugby Pacific CEO Jack Mesley's dismissal of South African teams’ contributions to the league. In a recent podcast, Mesley coolly noted that the South African fixtures "did not rate well" and "did not attend well" compared to current games. But Kirwan wasn’t having any of it on the Rivals podcast, declaring Mesley’s comments as "nonsense."
According to Kirwan, the exclusion of South African teams has not only diminished the competitive spirit of Super Rugby but has also stunted player development. “
"We have gone backwards [since South African teams left Super Rugby], and when I say that, I mean the step up for some of our players from Super Rugby to Test rugby is currently too big."
” Kirwan argued, suggesting that the challenges posed by South African squads are crucial for grooming players for international tests.Further stoking the flames, Kirwan questioned the integrity of Mesley's claims about improved game attendance and ratings. “
"Then I would also like to see the data [Mesley talks about] on how attendance and interest have increased. I don’t think he is telling the truth."
” he retorted, casting doubt on whether Super Rugby Pacific has truly benefitted from the absence of South African teams.The debate over the quality and competitiveness of Super Rugby has been reignited with Kirwan’s candid comments. Fans and pundits alike are now scrutinizing the league's direction and whether it can truly claim to be at the forefront of rugby development without the participation of South African teams.
As the dust settles on this latest rugby scuffle, the rugby community waits to see if any changes will be made to reinvigorate what many see as a faltering competition. Meanwhile, the debate continues to rage over the true impact of South Africa's exclusion from Super Rugby. With legends like Kirwan calling for a rethink, it’s clear this isn’t just about numbers — it’s about the soul of the game.