From the early days of Rassie how prominent is Mostert in the lineouts? In the loose he tackles like a warrior and securing possession.
Taking ball after ball, and still going ….salt in the wounds of the mud slingers….better yet, him and Rassie making there names mud!! LMAO
Egg alert. Due to mountains of egg landing on mampara posters on Ruckers Forum a worldwide egg shortage is predicted.
Denny
It would not help to post the video - the clueless have seen it before and they remain clueless since they sre set in their mids not to seeing reality. Mostert as a fringe player at te best of times and was shit in the 2019 C because of his defense deficiecncies, His contribution to the scoring o tries wahtoever,.
.
The two old hags at it again, with there wet Panties :)
Major Drivel alert ! :)
We just are try to stop lrugby unacy - but in your case nothing will help. How many fo te tries follow line out wins and the anser is virually none. .
Interesting. Our backline was far more innovative before WC2023. The players who made a difference…Willie, Kolbe, Dyante, Arendse and Am was massive. Pollard and Kriel did a their bit.
But where is Dud Allende. He scored two unopposed tries a U12 kid could have scored but for the rest ….totally absent. Our best runner in 12 channel is Kolisi.
The accepted narrative blown to bits again,
Poor wee mozzietard. The rugby world knows nothing. Stick with Mozz he says. 
Bwahahhahahaha
This should be easy…all our tries are there on the video. Point out to me where Dud Allende created one of those tries. Don’t run away now…just do it. This is your chance to prove me wrong,
HasBeen suddenly at a loss:
You trying to stop Rugby Lunacy you say…pls point out to me in any of my posts where I am this lunatic?
Yet you guys attack any other opinions on players or the coach, that does not align with your own, like rabid Dogs!
You guys will deliberately ignore what I actually wrote, turn those words around and blatantly Lie to support your own views.
How on Earth do you still expect that anything you have to say carries any credibility or that people will actually take you seriously?
Wouldn’t you call that lunatic behaviour ?
Stop being a hypocrite, and practice what you preach….
I lok at layers actual performance ad theirole in the team and then find that the better playes and Erasmus as coach is cosantly maligned and belittled baed on what people theorize abou better players, It is normal and has been ongoing for more han a decade and eventually I at lest got tred of the same repetitive BS,
I stick to facts - not finction as to performance of players, Take for instance Mostert and sterhuizen. After 19 tests ngelbrecht has not scored a single try - neither was he involved in zero try-assist - but he is th nest inside cner in SA which he is not, Nobody bit a few sit members support that BS. Mostert i s a 33 year old player - but he is irrepalcable. He is not ad if a person watchig a video on try scoringcomes up with how he jumps in line-outs the stroytheycome up with is totally incoherent, Instead of looking at positive contribtions toactually score tries a sate,emt f line-out jumping follows,
How is those two isses linked?
I lok at layers actual performance ad theirole in the team and then find that the better playes and Erasmus as coach is cosantly maligned and belittled baed on what people theorize abou better players, It is normal and has been ongoing for more han a decade and eventually I at lest got tred of the same repetitive BS,
I stick to facts - not finction as to performance of players, Take for instance Mostert and sterhuizen. After 19 tests ngelbrecht has not scored a single try - neither was he involved in zero try-assist - but he is th nest inside cner in SA which he is not, Nobody bit a few sit members support that BS. Mostert i s a 33 year old player - but he is irrepalcable. He is not ad if a person watchig a video on try scoringcomes up with how he jumps in line-outs the stroytheycome up with is totally incoherent, Instead of looking at positive contribtions toactually score tries a sate,emt f line-out jumping follows,
How is those two isses linked?
Firstly if you don’t get clean takes at the line outs, a big part of one of our strengths is wasted.
A clean line out take for example is a excellent platform from which you can score a try.
Take for example that defining line out in the semi final vs England WC 23.
RG took that ball clean, past it to Deon Fourie and he made a very good run close to the goal line of ENG.
At that Ruck Faf past the Ball to a storming RG and he went over for a winning try.
That’s is why your argument that Mostert,s very reliable clean line out takes has no effect, is the biggest BS ever!
You claim that you stick to facts and look at the performance of players? Then how the hell can you ignore Mosterts ongoing positive performances??
Or the excellent performances of Andre Esterhuisen?? It’s the biggest BS that a player can only be defined, because of the amount of tries he scores!
Pls go ahead and point out to us where Mostert has costed the team points in general? Or point out where he has fucked up a tackle that costed us points?
Or where he has lost ball possession at line out time repeatedly?
A lot of the excellent players in our team doesn’t score tries all the time.
But there other hard work like defence, securing possession and setting up tries , is very important to promote the team effort.
Without that hard work none of the actual points scored, is possible.
So no uncle Mike you base most of your arguments on BS and your Bias towards players.
Undeniable Facts.
LOL...hulle weet nie wat ons weet nie...maar die krewe weet...
Mooi Man! Uiteindelik iets wat van toepassing is op jou en jou vriendjies…julle maak Vordering Draad, veels geluk :)
Inteendeel...
Die waarheid het nie vriende nodig nie...
Kindergarten :)
How many clean line-outs are taken by Etzebeth and Du Toit and w many o those lad to tries being sciredm For instance a driving maul is a clean take in the first place - bu when a maul stops the effectis quite different. F or instance there was a maul in respect of one of he tries tha stopped going forward and was joined by De Allende and somehow teh A B defense disinegrated allowing Marx ro break ay and scored a try. A driving maul had vey little to do with going owarxd by the jumper - unless he is more powerful than for istance Mostert and you see some positve changes in Maul forward movement .cotruted to by he jumper - eg for inmstance Etzebeh and Du oit,
ries often comes from breakdown ball recovery and by turnovers caused by posession tunovers at breakdowns and from line breaks, startegic cking and careless opposition mistakes, On th videos the latter situation irepresent four of he tries sown on the vedeo,
My contention is that vey fe tries actually folow line-out takes on its own - bur that is where Marc and D Toit palys a major role.
Also on the video it shows De Allende scoring three tries and contributing to two more being scored - so he desrve mentioing - but you still claim he is shot, and ignore his contribuions totally. In the case of the try a ginst Wales Mozart wrote that it was due to a poor tackle attempt by the Wels flyhalf - whixch was lyng BSting on his part a is evident from the video/
Anoher implistic approach is abot goalkicking Graned Pollard converted the penaty kicks - but what forced the opposiion to gie away penalties, The latter deserve praise as well. Without them there would not be a kick at goal,
Take fr instance he RWC final in 2019. Mozart's forst claim was that Beas wo the final for the S priggbos through scrumming. here wre in fct four scrum penalties in the first half o hose Beast demolished a scrum of e AB's in to occassionss Malherbe in one case and in fourth one the English forwards collapsed totally in the scrum for which both Beast and Malherbe is resposib;e. The fifth penalty conerted by Pollard came from a scrum after both Beast and Malherbe were replaced and the 6yhth one wa from a very vlever play deised by Erasmusm Te Engis were forced o mae a kick under oresure nd a line out was formed - the lineout as nt formed yet when the ball waq hrown in and caght by Snyman and from their went o the scummie and direcly to De Allende who caried it to the 22 and then their was a breakdiwn wher baclie players protected he ball while Verrmeulen and the rst of the forwards formed a driving mal n midield and th maul was going forward rapidly when he English wer orced o bring the maul down - easy penalty folowed,
hen he enxt player that won the final becme Mstert for the defense by the Sprigboks when the English was atacking the tryline - Most's contribtion ws amking a couple of tackles in which the Englsih payes wnt orward - while the ebst tackler in those ten mines was Mlheb=rbe whose srog tackles forced the English players abckwards. The other strong tackle contributors were Etzebeth and Du Toit. So Mostert did not iwi the inal fr the Springboks,
Th other majot contributors were Mapimpi amd Kolbe. Adfer a breakdiwn the ball wnet quickly to th scummie who passed he ball to Am Maex and finally Mapimpi who amde a kick deep into he Englis 22 and Am got the ball ad passed it to Mapimpi who scored the ry, The econd trycame when the English ried dsperately t break the Springboks defensive line with no success at all the English commentator made the claic remark "There is no way through" so afte a deadly eA llende tackle the ball went to Stone who got real hard ackle from Mrax droppng the ball in the process/ Am picked up he ball and passed it to Du Toit who drew in 2 defeders and passed the ball to Kolbe giving him the latter exra space to operate in and e rest is history.
In essense tries are normally team efforts and someimes individual brilliance so i recognise ad credt all ayer ivolved n ahve no pe hate players in the team, I goe credit at all ayrs involved in scoring of tries - not only slctive once, That is why I ound yor intitial contribution off topic and not of any real value, - bar the Arentine est in 2013 - for th e rest i s neve mor han 11 per year and mostly scored by forwards.
You refer above ti kicking the ball afterbreakdiwn ball reviery. I hapens frequently when the Springboks aedfeding in their own 22 and rarely when i happened near he halfay line and in opposiion territorym whenalrtenative attacking opportunties are possible, and cross kcks are forms of atacking as well. Wah you imply above is simplistic and in the main misleading,
.
. . , .
"Kindergarten 
"
Indeed...you said it.
No one is denying the contribution of the rest of the team like Eben, Pieter, DDA, Marx etc.
All I am saying is that Mostert just like everyone else also deserves his credit for the tireless work he does!!
And by the way Rassie picks him all the time, but off course then conveniently Rassie is not perfect or he has fucked up….
But here you are writing long Post full of Bullshit trying to diminish and discredit Mostert .
P.s. how is a person supposed to understand that post completely? Try your best to use a tool to help with the spelling and grammar.
Is it even important to you that we understand what you write? Or do you need help like plum was saying?
So nobody can point out one instance where Dud Allende created any of those tries. Thanks…got it.
He did scor three of the tries himelf and snvolve d in tris scored twice, as wellm
The tries he scored were walk-ins, which others created. He himself created nothing. But if I’m wrong correct me by pointing out those creative moments.
Liar liar - yur pants re n fire,
Same old reflex to the insult…so boring, Point them out….the tape is right on this string
.....the stroytheycome up with is totally incoherent........
That's rich coming from you.
So the tries wre walk-ins, The try against Wales was no walk-in therer was mised becaue De Alende a ackle on him - De Allende ran throiugh that attempt and two other Wales players attempted simuntneously to prevnt the trie heing scored despite two defenders / You lie about the issue lying about the Wales flyhalf missing a tackle on De Alleende due to poor defence, There is nn walk-ins in any tries being scored against te AB's village idiot,
If there was a walk-in agaist Wales it w the Mostert try on Saturday when Mostert scored a try receiving the ball with an pen tryline in front of him and you put a phto of the try a photo o the year on that one - it being the third try scored by Moster i his 72 test appearances - yet in your case nobody can ever believe yor lies when you try and desribe what happened in matches,
So the player you wnt at indside center in 19 tests scored zero tries and in none assist in the coring of tries. Yet you want him in the test team ahead of De Allende. De Allende is tractoring yet esomehow isin theright psition to receive he balls to score tries.
The shit and lies on rugby issues is limitless and your lies on Du Toit and Easmus as coach indicate your total lack of rugby knowledge and your prejudice against Eramus and the two playes mentioned is total BS. When you came up on another case and ask you about nobody else in the wrld menione d the BS you ame up with lie I asked you how come not a single rugby exert in te world agrees with you on n incident you claimed and you were the only person in the world who analyzed incduets correctly and that yoo "see" things that other analyzers miss. So let me add - in your prjudiced mind you manage to twist incidens lik o do, Plainly put you in you twisted mind and because real experts did not sue om a tisted mind they diid not see the shit you come up with,
.
These are all the tries against the All Blacks, Wales isn’t part of the conversation. So apologize and actually look at the video…then opine if you must. But silence is probably your friend.
Mostert 78 caps ....... 50 starts .............. 5 tries & the best tackle stats in RWC history.
Bump for Dave to show us how Dud Allende was amazing in any try over 6years against NZ.
11,605 posts
.