Congratulations Portugal

Completely outgunned in the physical stakes, they were creative and willing to take the punishment. As far as the Boks were concerned….Snyman, Sacha, Mapimpi  were among our best. Disappointing Libbok, Moerat, Roos, and Louw.

This kind of match provides little reliable information…but looking at Roos being unable to impose himself has to raise a question or two.

What was shocking is the amount of mistakes we made…our scrums was not working…wessels is not a prop! And Thomas was sometimes struggling against a 38 year old loose head…but stood a bit better later on, but they struggled to push Portugal back.

Tank is a better Loose head…Wilco needs to be chosen for the RC as Trevor did sweet blow all in the scrums and Mchunu is not world class!! Moerat was not good at all and also knocked the ball quite a few times….also saw that Snyman assisted in captain duties.

Roos and Louw was not that bad….but Ben was really good….Sacha should get more game time at 10 he is really mature and solid…yes Snyman was excellent…it really looks like .Mapimpi and Arendse can only finish and must have a open goal line in front of them…Grobbelaar, and both Venters did good… Pepsi was ok but did not stand out.

We need Am and a pity Andre couldn’t stay longer, Damm pity… Fassi was good under high ball and spotting space.

Libbok was good in his passing/ Distribution and kicking out of hand, but to poles is still a nightmare….

What you on about Roos, Moerat and Louw were good Libbok’s general game was good his kicking for poles let him down but that does not mean he had a bad game

What game were you watching

The skills of Sacha and RG are next level

Not another single second needs to be lost with reference to RG starting every test he plays in moving forward

We have already lost years worth with useless Mostert

Let me guess Moz is this the start of your anti Roos campaign - I can see it coming. You will be forever telling us how shit he is moving forward

You are a strange one. Roos had as good an outing as any other forward today and Louw was just as good when he came on

Wiese will only be back for the AB tests and playing Kwagga at 8 against OZ is maybe Not such a good idea seeing he struggled in imposing himself physically vs Ireland.. Roos was definitely stronger in that department…Ben jason Dixon is good In Pieter,s spot….Cameron Hanekom might be in contention after he comes back from injury…. He is also really good….but Right now I can see maybe Roos starting, but Rassie will most properly start Kwagga again.

Roos coughed up the ball twice….and was ineffective in his ball carrying. That against Portugal. He made 46 metres in 12 carries and beat one tackle.

Against Ireland Kwagga made 53 metres in 10 carries, beating 2 tackles and coughing up the ball once.

Kwagga was more effective against Ireland than Roos was against  Portugal. 

Bullshit Roos was strong in the carry far stronger that Kwagga was. Roos was better than Kwagga without doubt

Roos lost the ball once the second time was because Arendse never effected a clean out as the commentators mentioned

Your take on Roos is bullshit he had a good game

What else do people expect?   having to play with 14 playes for the whole game and without another player for  10 mnuts caused problems for the Springboks and left gaps in following up attacks and gaps in defence.

What was indeed  in the game was not touched on was the effectiveness of the balin hand attacking game wa seriously undermined by the player who should not have been in the tem in the first place - Estrhuizen.   So what will happen next?    There are 2 possibilities - namely that he is elft out of the Springbok sqad totally - or that  he remains in the squad, but is never put on the bench as long as the Springboks picked a 6.2 bench selection.

As to the other potential yonger players  is concerned I think the following younger players should reman in contention:-

*    Fassie

*    Feinberg-Ngomezulu

*    Roos

*    Wessels

*    Venter (Hoker)

*    Venter (Loosie)

*    Buthulezi (Loosie)

The folowing playersis likey to be out of future Springbok squads:-

*    Mostert

*    Esterhuizen

I think we will see much more of Willeme and Feinberg-Ngomezulu in future - the altter in particular as he seems to be a better option to replace Pollard in future,    I think that Pollard will quite soon be on the bench in teams as F-N  will start as flyhalf - Pollard even until 2027 be the back-up flyhalf,   The same could apply at 12 - wth Willemse the frst choice no 12 an backe up by De Allende.

 .

   /        

.                      

‘Without a doubt ….bullshit…an insult’ . But the numbers never back up your arguments. Considering the opposition Roos was poor yesterday. He has now been in 7 tests, 4 as a starter, and has yet to look like the replacement for Vermeulen. Hennie Muller, a Bok legend, only played in 13 tests.

 I’m making no judgements, just recording the facts. But he needs to perform at test level.

Roos getting ripped in the carry by a wee wing directly sparked Portugal's first try.

Bull shit Pakie that’s an insult, the Boks were only playing with 14 men, and the wing wasn’t small. He was more physical than Mostert.  And I’m sure it was raining in Bloem, the ball was slippery. How can you play ball in hand rugby  (pardon the pun) in a downpour?

FACT

Case closed!

Oh fucking wow one would swear the likes of our stars have never had a ball ripped off them

Kwagga was shit at 8 against the Irish in both tests and that’s a fact while Roos was good against weak opposition

One fucking rip does not define a player just like Libbok kicking badly never defined his game.

Relying on stats alone is short sighted and rugby ignorant

Roos has been good in all his tests so far better than Wiese was when he started

I can see it now Roos moving forward has a target on his back - it’s fucking pathetic

The gold standard is to see if he can hit two rucks with a broken leg and then walk himself off the field like Mostert. You know, powderpuffing.

And you have been telling the story of how Mostert was out mauled by a fullback….being stripped by a Portuguese wing seems very similar. Do you now tell us how lacking in physicality Roos is again and again.

Just remind me again what is the role of a great fly-half!

Is converting place kicks and drop kicks not part of his role if he is selected as a designated kicker?

If he cannot convert  at a respectable percentage in each "TEST" he is classed as poor.

He is just another ELTON I'm afraid.

Great at Currie Cup and friendly games but useless in test.

Just wish to remind you of some of the kicks he missed in the RWC last year.

If he had stayed on as the #10 in any of the KO or final games we wouild never have pulled of the wins.

Thanks to Pollard we won the RWC.

Class not arse.

Oh wow rugby ignorance runs thick here. There is a huge difference between a forward having the ball ripped out of his hands by a back - it’s a common occurrence in the modern game with players targeting the ball instead of the player and a lock not being able to clean out an 18 year old fullback

We all know Mostert lacks physicality, not being able to clean out a fullback is an example of this

We know Roos is both physical and gifted and having the ball ripped from him is not an indication that he lacks physicality

I have never questioned the fact that Mostert is tough and certainly durable but unfortunately that does not equate to physicality. We all know powder puff can’t impose himself physically be it carrying the ball, making dominant tackles or adding grunt to the mauls, scrums etc

Joke is that some are saying Roos has a handful of tests but has failed to set a mark - question is, where those tests in succession, has he had time to settle - big fat no.

But we all know that moving forward we will be forever told how shit Roos is. Target is sighted

The denial runs thick here….the denial that Roos was ripped by a tiny wing…the denial that Libbok was and still is a match loser….the denial that Mostert has been a huge contributor as starting 5 throughout the WC.

Denial upon denial. Deny the stats, make judgements using a scale, even the coaches are wrong, but only in this instance.

Dave you have lost the plot…,nobody is giving up on Roos…yet. But don’t ask us to say he had an acceptable game when he clearly was one of weakest contributors.

Bullshit was he one of the weakest contributors that is a lie and backs rip balls from forwards all the time - if you watch rugby you’d know that

Libbok had a good game - that’s a fact. He kicked poorly - does that define his performance as a rugby player on the day - no it does not. It’s does raise question marks over future selection based solely on his kicking as a team needs a reliable kicker

Mostert has contributed fuck all - watching RG on Saturday actually made me angry given the ridiculous call to start Mostert ahead of this freak of a player

Mostert has zero grunt and is not even a talented rugby player - what does he actually do other than take his line out ball and make process tackles - he is shit

Denial my arse - these are all rugby realities

The lie about the Roos so called strip - he picks the ball up and targets the 8, getting past him but the 8 gets enough on Roos to cause him to start falling down, on the way down he uses his left hand to fend off the wing and losses possession in the process. The ball falls out of Roos’s hand and onto the stomach of the wing, bouncing up with the wing tapping it to the next man who grubbers through

Fabrication as always

The truth could go either way, Dave. You can see the wing's arm going in under the ball as Roos hits him and as the arm comes up the ball can be seen coming out too, that's what indicates a rip for me. We obviously can't see what actually happened and it matters as little in the big scheme of things as Mostert's moment with the fullback.

Well what we clearly see is Roos going through their 8 but the 8 gets enough on Roos to cause him to start going down, in the process of falling he fends off the wing with his left arm and in the process losses possession of the ball which bounces onto the wing stomach

What clearly does not happen is the wing fronting up to Roos and ripping the ball off him as you lot said had happened

Your take is just fabricated bullshit

As for Mostert he has never shown any form of physicality in any aspect of his game as he simply can’t as he does not have the physique or bulk to do so. My question to you is, what does he bring?

If we are going to have a less physical lock playing in the side then surely he should show a different skill set that compensates for that lack of grunt. He should be a really skilful athlete with good pace, great hands, great rugby brain - all things that would make him stand out given we can’t rely on him to make a dominant impact physically. He has non of that - like Matfield had and like Ruan Nortje of the Bulls has and like Grobelaar at the Sharks - these guys are not the most physical but they are all really good athletic players who contribute more in general play.

Then you have RG at 136kg with a skill set that goes through the roof and we insulting select Mostert to start ahead of him. It’s literally the biggest travesty in rugby in my opinion.

Mostert takes his line out ball and makes loads of process tackles whoop, whoop

I seriously don’t get it and it blights the genius that is Rassie

Your Mostert is my DDA. Never the two shall meet, we might as well stop trying to convince each other either way.

I might of course not stop trying to wind you up with it, you're more fun that way.

The only person that winds me up is Rassie selecting powder puff

As for de Allende if all the other test 12’s out there were built differently and played differently to DA then you might have a point but fact is you don’t

I see Mostert for what he does not bring and I see DA for what he does bring

I see Mostert for what he does not bring and I see DA for what he does bring

That would explain a lot.

Exactly the things powder puff can’t do far out weigh what he does do, while what DA does do far out weighs what he does not do

Here are the facts Rooos coughed up the ball twice , can you see the 2 Dave?

We are talking about the first one you bullshitted about

The second one was thanks to Arendse not cleaning the jackler out of the way as the commentators correctly pointed out

So try again - stats mean fuck all, they provide zero context

Rely on your eyes and I might take you seriously

Against Portugal! Not France, not Ireland, not the ABs…..can’t you just admit he was disappointing against Portugal. It’s not a secret.

He was not disappointing he was good against Portugal as he has been in the sporadic test caps he has received

You are just lying

8 Evan Roos: A really industrious shift from the number eight, who was unlucky to miss out on the Ireland series. Constantly got his hands on the ball and consistently dragged his side over the gain-line. 7

Player ratings are like stats, Dave. They mean fuck all, they provide zero context.

Speaking in general, not with Roos as a target .

That is true he had a good game, he was certainly not poor

He was on par with the majority of the players

Took another look….totally stripped by the tiny little Portuguese wing. He does a pick and go….bouncing right up into the face of the Portuguese 8 who can’t make the high tackle, but gets him low around the legs. 

He stumbles forward into the wee, tiny, little wing. Roos fends him with an elbow to the neck. The wing stands his ground and Roos falls to the right. But the Goose is making contact directly below the ball and is resisting Roos’ move forwards, clearly obvious by how he plants his left leg

In the next freeze frame the ball is already out of Roos’ possession…ripped and going backwards towards the Boks line. Dropping the ball it doesn’t go in that direction. Force applied consistent with the Goose’s body position makes that happen.

Ripped by a tiny, little Goose….the verdict.

Give me the time stamp of the other Roos fumble Dave and I’ll explain it to you.

I found the incident you referred to…..that’s not a fumble. He obviously was involved in a third loss of the ball.  In this incident at minute 33.35 he gets the ball with an overlap down the wing…..is tracked down by the tiny Goose flyhalf who he tries to fend…..the Goose sails in under the ineffective fend and deposits him right at the feet of the next Goose.

He falls perfectly, almost presenting the ball. Arendse comes in and actually wrestles the defender off the ball, but too late Roos had held on. And then Arendse is pinged for a cross roll yellow trying to fix Roos’ blunder.

This occurred because he never looked for support and isolated himself. Amateurish, ineffective running.

Complete and utter lie - shame on you

A frame by frame description….your’s was the lie putting all the blame on Arendse and pretending the ball just popped out of Rooos’ hands. 

Roos spilt the ball there was no rip by the wing and that’s a fact

I’m not blaming Arendse I’m saying he never cleaned out the jackler - it happens all the time in rugby. The commentators said exactly what I saw - they said Arendse failed to clean the player

Roos got isolated, it happens, Arendse was in a position to clean out but failed / not the worst thing in the world given the size of Arendse

Arendse wasn’t in position….the fetcher was, perfect position….Rooos fell right at his feet. And poor as Rooos was, he never just dropped the ball….it came out as a result on contact with the Goose.

Stop speaking shit Roos got past the 8 who got enough on him to cause him to go down - on his way down he fends off the wing with his left hand and in the process loses the ball in his right hand which lands on the wings stomach, pops up and he flips it to a team mate

None of that sequence has any reference to Roos being poor or having the ball ripped by a tiny wing - that’s all fabricated by yourself as yet again we see you starting a pathetic attack on a player which predictably will now continue every time we see him play

The Arendse clean out or lack there of had nothing to do with this sequence of play - that relates to Roos having the ball turned over later in the game. Let me guess he was weak and poor because he made a good few metres, got isolated, tackled and turned over because his team mate could not assist him?

Mozart is the reat rugby exoert n site who sees what he wishes to see happenng on site and claimed that ESPN stats gves the full indicayon what happens on site.   here are a prgram that indicate exactly wat the contribution of each player in the team during whole matches available  since 2014.

So in 4 years Mozart criticize Meyer once and Coetzee once - and on the whole find BS to wrte on site.   He is not only dishonest - he frequently lies n site abut what happened in matches.   Wheb caught out he went  quiet on issues and a month or two later repeat his riginal BS.

When Erasmus was appointed he lied about Erasmus' career and claime that Coetzee should be retained than Erasmus appointed,   He wanted White appointe instead of  Erasmus - despite the fact that White hs serious limitations as a coach - as proven by the shit produced by the Sharks i 2014,  resulting in the Sharks telling White to resign or he will be fired.  

Sice the apoiting of Erasmus he spouted constast BS on site and his duplicity is always clear,   I listene to Matfield comments about the game and they were etirely dfferent fro what the shitspreades said on site.   I presume that one must believe shit from Mozart and not believe the comments of real people involved in rugby.   

Take an example - the only reason why the Springboks won the RWC final in 2023 was that the AB's lost the test was that a player was red-carded early in the match and Pollard kicked four penalties conversions.   The fact that the the malfunctining of he backline was NOT affected by Esterhuizen being red-carded for a stupid tackle on a small backline player.in the first move after starting of the game meant nothing at all to this bloody fool.   Not that Esterhuizen was a poor defeder and sub-standard players in tests he did play in. before does not stop him from supporting Esterhuizen all the way.    

So lets go back to 2014 when the Sahrks had a poor Superrugby record losing their first four matches in the series and then in a match agaist the Crusaders in Durban they managed a win  in  Durban and that was on of he worse matches imaginable,   Three minutes after a red card against an AB player - Steyn made a similar tackle on a Crusader playe and was red-carded as well.and the match deteriorated into a mess which the Sharks won narrowly.  White did not rate Esterhuizen as center and tried him once as  no 7 loosie after which he did not play at center. afterwards.   In the end end he Highlanders - who beat the Sharks by 15 points in the round-robi stage of the tournament - ended up in having  to play in the quarerinals in Duban - a match the Sharks won narowly.   They then had to play the Crusaders in the semi and hey lost that one 38-3.  The total mismanaging of the team caused White to be fired by the Sharks.

White went Montpellier where he signed a two year contract - which was not renewed  after expiry and he went to Japan to coach there.   What was really funny was that Meyer and Coetzee - whom he had no real problems with as to coaching as to coaching - went to coach club teams in France and  Japan and in both cases were fired bcause they came close to both teams being cut out as performng as send rate teams and they got fired by the clubs becaus they were totally incompetent.

Yet the same Mozar who write attcks on Erasmus based on his brain farts are to be attacke on a daily basis.    There was one diffrence only that he - as well as both Meyer an Coetzee did.   Meyer and Coezee had the detailed match analysis systems of the role every player plays in performances an quality of performances during matches -theya paprently did not uderstand thevalue of teh system and did not use it.    Mzart did not have that analysis - so he use half-backe stats foom ESPN that didnot tae ito account the quality of player s hisonly reference pois and caus him to come up with incidents i matches where he actually lied abut what happened in matches.

The loss of the matches in 2015 against Japan in 2015 and against Italy in 2017 caused the effective firing of Meyer and Ceozee respectively.   So the latest BS that Erasmus inherited the palyes from Coetzee and did nohing positive have been spouted by Mozart recently.   He emntioned 11 playes and started off ith Pollard who did not play a single match for the Springboks while Coezee was coached - as on that shitlist o him.   He previusly spouted  the BS that  De Allende and Kriel played as center combination for the Springboks and when I pointe out it happene only 3 times in the whole of 2016 and 2017 - when 24 tests were played - he went quiet and now came back with the same BS in a differen format.. 

I spoke to a variety of people with real knowedge of Rugby and they claimed that Erasmus is the coach that saved SA rugby from total destruction - but the beserk Mozart went on with his unfounded BS he invented himself.

His analysis of the matchon Saturday w on par with the riutine BS he came up with since 2013 

    -                

                      .   ,

                 .  

Wanker  is your machine on the blink again?

Mozart

You are the most dishonest rugby performance evaluator ever and that says a lot.    

And yet Eluckmiss obviously saw the same faults I saw in Roos’ game.

It was a shoot out between Elrigh Louw and Roos which Louw seems to have won

I’m not convinced about that - both should have been in the squad

Let’s hope like hell we don’t see anymore of Kwagga at 8 - it has to be Louw

If Elrigh won that shootout , it was close….it was the small things like the loss of possession and Metres gained, that swung Rassie. I think he will Play Elrigh @ 8, because in the Portugal game he moved Pepsi to 6 for Elrigh at 8 when he came onto the Field.

I think he will unfortunately stick with Kwagga at 8

Rassie likes to stick with what he knows unfortunately when it comes to the bigger games

It will mean Reinach will start at 9, Pollard at 10 and Willie at 15

We will probably see something stupid like Moerat starting ahead of RG

The hype catches up with Rooos. There are still those who believe Libbok at 27 is going to come good, That too shall pass.

Well it looks like Rassie sees it differently with manie as he still gets picked.

Both R&N said in interviews that his ability to set up tries, is what keeps him in the squad.

But on the other hand, when it came to the more important games, the risk was not taken to start him.

It was seen clearly in the Portugal game how all facets of the 10 improved once Sascha came on.

Especially Kicking for poles which is very important in the test environment …you need all those points.

You might see a Manie start against the less difficult teams like Potugal or will play more of a of the Bench role or just a injury sub in the squad .

A timely reminder of Roos’ last test.

Roos was solid in that test - fact

Yes losing the ball twice is what a Bok 8 should be expected to do against the mighty Geese.

Here are the facts not your pathetic lie

The lie about the Roos so called strip - he picks the ball up and targets the 8, getting past him but the 8 gets enough on Roos to cause him to start falling down, on the way down he uses his left hand to fend off the wing and losses possession in the process. The ball falls out of Roos’s hand and onto the stomach of the wing, bouncing up with the wing tapping it to the next man who grubbers through

Fabrication as always

So you think he forgot he was carrying the ball when he tried to fend. Nonsense it was contact and he never went past he went down, proven by the fact that the ball bounced off the Goose towards the Bok line.

Cover up as always.

Well what is certain is that he was not man handled which is what you said - which is a blatant bloody lie

He was fending off the 8 with his right hand and in the process lost possession of the ball in his left. Is that evidence of him being man handled by a little wing - fuck right off

You are simply lying and that’s a fact

Small man handled would be more accurate.

You simply lied but hey ho nothing new there

Nonsense he tried to run over the wee fellow who stood up to him and forced a fumble….undeniable facts.

Fuck you are seriously delusional

You just lied and that’s a fact

Roos...probably the next PSDT-like legend, if Moz's reaction to him is anything to go by...thank Goodness!!!

You are right both vastly overrated.

Draad don’t worry you are dealing with a man who knows better than Schalk and Jean

What the fuck do they know about PSDT hey

Stick with Moz bwaaahaaaaa

Ill say it again fuck me it must be so sad being the sad excuse of a supporter that you are - Roos is shit, PSDT is shit, DA is shit, Rassie is shit,…….

Okay I have looked at clip again, frame by frame. Roos stumbles into the wee fellow after he has a good opportunity to offload to . But he strains on. The tiny wing is not trying to bring him down he is actually lifting, bracing with his left leg.

Both arms are underneath the ball that suddenly pops out and back. The clip is not decisive but it looks totally like he stripped Roos.

And of course purse that leads. directly to a try. Even if Roos flat dropped the ball it was woeful. But allowing that tiny tike to be the instrument is pretty inexcusable.

Here’s the clip: https://www.google.com/search?q=portugal+vs+Springboks+2024&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:6bb07f26,vid:nNo4jGm0-e4,st:0

Okay I have looked at clip again, frame by frame. Roos stumbles into the wee fellow after he has a good opportunity to offload to Reinach. But he strains on ball under his right arm. The tiny wing is not trying to bring him down he is actually lifting, bracing with his left leg.

Both arms are underneath the ball….his focus on the ball. As one progresses in the frames, one can see the Goose’s right arm underneath Roos’ left arm…lifting it way up… suddenly the ball pops out to Roos’ left. The clip is not decisive because we are seeing it from Roos’ back, but what we see looks totally like he stripped Roos.

And of course that leads. directly to a try. Even if Roos flat dropped the ball it was woeful. But allowing that tiny tike to be the instrument is pretty inexcusable.

Here’s the clip: https://www.google.com/search?q=portugal+vs+Springboks+2024&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:6bb07f26,vid:nNo4jGm0-e4,st:0

How do you like them apples Stupex? Stripped by a tiny little Goose wing.

You are a fucking liar - nothing changes with you

But best of all you are fucking stupid enough to declare that that bit of play had the little wing physically getting the better of Roos

Either you lied or you are fucking stupid - take your pick

He stripped Roos who was in full possession of the ball if slightly off balance when they made contact. You can deny it as much as you like the physical evidence is undeniable as is the embarrassing 90 metre try that resulted from Roos’ blunder.

Time for another foul mouthed hissyfit?

You are lying old man as you always do - Roos had the ball in his left, while fending off the 8 with his right. He was going down after contact with the 8

So ball in weaker hand and falling to the ground and you are fucking stupid enough to declare the wing man handled Roos you fucking liar

You are just a sad fucking liar

No Shorty….read and learn:

Frame 1 He has stumbled through the number 8 tackle, ball in RIGHT hand, body twisted to the left.

Frame 2 He makes contact with the Goose, left elbow high. The Goose sets his left leg and is facing towards his own line.

Frame 3 The Goose holds his ground Roos starts falling to his right, the Goose’s arms are down low where the ball is.

Frame 4 The Goose is looking at the ball, his arms still where the ball is, Roos right arm still crooked to hold the ball but it isn’t visible

Frame 5 The Goose continues to pull up, Roos left arm is pinned so it can’t help and a sliver of the ball pops out on Roos’’ left side.

Frame 6 The ball is loose over Roos’ left hip and going backwards. He never just dropped the ball it was dislodged

Frame 7 Job done the Goose’s left arm flies up, Roos looks back at the ball.

Frame 8 Falling backwards the Goose paws the bouncing ball to a team mate, it gets kicked ahead and regathered …try time,

……….

This small Portuguese player stood his ground taking Roos full momentum and everything the Goose did, his arm positions and actions and the way the ball came out, were consistent with a strip.

You Dave are a bombastic, fat shortie with a Napoleon complex. If you want to debate, do so like a civilized person and stop lying when your lies are so easy to disprove.

Listen here you fucking useless sad excuse for a SA rugby supporter - the only fucking liar here is you you pathetic twat

You fucking lied that a tiny wing man handled Roos

But you are such a fucking coward you can’t admit you lied about that pathetic childish statement

Everything about you is fucking pathetic when it comes to SA rugby

Do us a favour and just fuck off and go support another country

We don’t need your pathetic negativity polluting our wonderful game

You pathetic fucking liar - man handled Roos - fuck off

More Swearing and unproven rants vs 9 frames that prove you are lying through your teeth Stupex.

Did the wing man handle Roos you fucking liar?

Yes he stopped him dead and stripped the ball….that’s handled in my book.

Fucking liar

Hilarious Fat Man living your life in a 5’10” 250 lb body……with only one interest in life and then finding out you miss so much every time you watch a game.

Perhaps you should try the live match strings, you might finally learning something Porker.

Fucking pathetic liar

77 tick tock tick tock