Mostly becaue of B S cooked up by Plum and others repeating the same issues endlessly, The coach is shit and they know better than rugby experts worldwide who are top class players. It is always about players they regard as rugby saints and a clueless Erasmus,
It is sickening to read the same BS repeartedly twice of more times a week. Before one opens a new thread on site one can expect nothing new - just a repeat of the same BS. Objective analysis is nowher to be found and there are virtually no topics on site that has not been repeated hundreds and even thousands of times on this site,
Weird - but true, Their usage of ESPN is classic - no rugby analyst use them since theym are superficial and amateurish and often misleading. Experts used advanced performance analysis systems available to international and even on club level when assessing performance evaluation - only duds use ESPN stats and then claim they are th alpha and omega as means to analize performances - amazing BS repeated endlessly.
Reduce the number of topics openedd on site, If the BS includes Ebasmus, Du Toit, De Allende and playes under constant attacks or praised - classify the threds to deal with that type of uses classiy each under the same repeats with headings listed and reduce the topics to deal with those coaches and players under the same heading and open new threads that deal with performance and where real evaluation of team perfomance in specific matches then becomes an interesting variation deserving something new and interesting to be discussed,
Add to Rugby the following sub-headings:
- Rugby - Erasmus
- Rugby - P-S du Toit
- Rugby - De Allende
- Rugby - St Esterhuizen
17,221 posts
Could we please have one?
One often wants to go back to match threads but they get lost in all the chit chat about Mike's latest imaginings and Dave's newest list of 785 players that should all be Boks asap.