’As expected St Esterhuizen was theidiot who did it by catching a ball that was intended a short kick-in - so theeir wen the ploy’.
Actually no….the kick was deliberately short of the 10 meter line, Esterhozen was supposed to catch it to set up a scrum….it was another DrErasmus trick,
57,436 posts
Before I wite about the performances thus far of thr Spring boks thu far in the match I have to wrote aa story about a porp called Chris kich who in 1955 became the mst cap forward in th history of the Springboks and my father =- a friend of Koch - took us to Newlands to watch the match. Koch fucked up royally and it as h the last test he ever played fopr the Spprin gboks, D id Wo;;oe in his hundred test to do any better - in my opinion not.
The test in the first half was a tiyal fuck0up too, It started off th deliberately causing scrum on the miffle line.Handig posses over to the Italians. As expected St Esterhuizen was theidiot who did it by catching a ball that was intended a short kick-in - so theeir wen the ploy. Later in the game Wiese head-butted an Italian player and got red-carded 0 wgereafter St Esterhuizen wa smoved to the flank forwad poisition.
He was useless as center and when the Springboks was attacking the tryline the ball was passed to Esterhuizen and he knocked it on 3 meter out.
Now my overall assesment woth that team th Springboks will lose against the AB;s and the French because what happened in reality was a total mess some peeope call rugby - but the efforts of Van der Merwe andModie showed real talent - the rest was plainly not international; rugby.
Before I retirm tp watch the next bugger-up followed - a yellow card for another illegal tackle against Wilco Louw, . -