Dr Lucky prides himself on not being predictable.Do it wouldn’t surprise me to see the Wellington team in the first Bargie test and then a complete reversal to the Eden Park team in the Twickenham fixture …or vice versa
Dr Lucky prides himself on not being predictable.Do it wouldn’t surprise me to see the Wellington team in the first Bargie test and then a complete reversal to the Eden Park team in the Twickenham fixture …or vice versa
Yeah would have been interesting to see what that first Argies test selection would have been had Fassi not got injured for now it’s a dead circumcision Willemse will be moved to 15 sadly
With Willemse moving to 15 will this have a knock on effect for Moodie?
Will Rassie then resort back to the partnership of DA and Kriel?
But for me it’s more about the squad players not involved in the match 23
Why have a bunch of 34 year olds carrying the tackling bags when it should be the youngsters
This part of the equation makes no sense to me
"Dr Lucky prides himself on not being predictable.Do it wouldn’t surprise me to see the Wellington team in the first Bargie test and then a complete reversal to the Eden Park team in the Twickenham fixture …or vice versa"
He will select the team according to the conditions and opposition...not?
30,292 posts
if the older, past it players like Mapimpi, Faf, Koch, Bongi and Mostert are no longer being utilised then why are they being retained in the squad? I’d add Reinach to that list - he should be in the same boat as my list.
Surely it would make far more sense having youngayer players in the squad, gaining exposure, learning the systems, making their path to selection easier?
I don’t get it - discard these players and replace them with the likes of Julius or David Kriel or Tyrone Green or Jordan Hendrikse or Papier or Hanro Jacobs or AH Venter or Cobus Wiese or Ruben v Heerden or Vincent Tsituka or Roos etc
Makes zero sense to me unless these older players are actually going to be selected which I can’t see happening against the Argies