Victor Matfield, the legendary Springbok lock, sheds light on why South Africa, despite being the most successful team in Rugby World Cup history, struggles to maintain consistency compared to teams like New Zealand and Ireland. With four World Cup wins under their belt, the Springboks should theoretically be the epitome of rugby excellence, yet they falter in the face of expectation, thriving instead as underdogs.
On the Rivals podcast, Matfield explained, "There are probably two teams in the world that can perform consistently well without that emotional high before a game and that's New Zealand and Ireland. They focus on the process." His insight suggests that while the Boks have tried to emulate this approach, the results have been mixed. "Most of the time when we are the favourites we don't perform up to that level. When we're the underdogs and no one gives us a chance, that's when South Africans stand up because they then bring that emotion," Matfield added.
"How can you expect me to believe that when you’ve won the biggest competition in the world? That is k*k man, I just can’t believe that,"
Former All Blacks star Sir John Kirwan was taken aback by Matfield's comments during the podcast, challenging the notion that World Cup victories are not indicative of consistent performance. Matfield responded by emphasizing the unique pressure of the World Cup, where "you actually just need to win probably three big games," differentiating it from the demands of consistent performance required in tournaments like Super Rugby.
Matfield also hinted at ongoing efforts under the guidance of coach Rassie Erasmus to shift the Springboks’ mindset, noting a better performance in 2024. Yet, the psychological battle remains, "With South Africa, Rassie is kind of getting there with this team, but when we were favourites, all of a sudden you struggle, you scrap away to win five, six or seven points," he explained.
The crux of the matter, according to Matfield, is the freedom with which teams like New Zealand and Ireland play when they're leading, a stark contrast to the pressure-driven performances of the Springboks. This psychological dimension continues to be a defining factor in how these top rugby nations perform on the international stage.
2,193 posts
Victor Matfield, the legendary Springbok lock, sheds light on why South Africa, despite being the most successful team in Rugby World Cup history, struggles to maintain consistency compared to teams like New Zealand and Ireland. With four World Cup wins under their belt, the Springboks should theoretically be the epitome of rugby excellence, yet they falter in the face of expectation, thriving instead as underdogs.
On the Rivals podcast, Matfield explained, "There are probably two teams in the world that can perform consistently well without that emotional high before a game and that's New Zealand and Ireland. They focus on the process." His insight suggests that while the Boks have tried to emulate this approach, the results have been mixed. "Most of the time when we are the favourites we don't perform up to that level. When we're the underdogs and no one gives us a chance, that's when South Africans stand up because they then bring that emotion," Matfield added.
"How can you expect me to believe that when you’ve won the biggest competition in the world? That is k*k man, I just can’t believe that,"
Former All Blacks star Sir John Kirwan was taken aback by Matfield's comments during the podcast, challenging the notion that World Cup victories are not indicative of consistent performance. Matfield responded by emphasizing the unique pressure of the World Cup, where "you actually just need to win probably three big games," differentiating it from the demands of consistent performance required in tournaments like Super Rugby.
Matfield also hinted at ongoing efforts under the guidance of coach Rassie Erasmus to shift the Springboks’ mindset, noting a better performance in 2024. Yet, the psychological battle remains, "With South Africa, Rassie is kind of getting there with this team, but when we were favourites, all of a sudden you struggle, you scrap away to win five, six or seven points," he explained.
The crux of the matter, according to Matfield, is the freedom with which teams like New Zealand and Ireland play when they're leading, a stark contrast to the pressure-driven performances of the Springboks. This psychological dimension continues to be a defining factor in how these top rugby nations perform on the international stage.