Majestic Amla guides Proteas home

An d the best bowler was Pretorius on the day,  Amla an Du Plessis was under no pressure,   

So useless brainless and stupid reckons that Amla - who made 203 runs in 7 games played than De Kock - who scored 293 runs in 8 games.  Just the way the idiotic mind works.    

Hahaha. Ou Maaikie trying to duck out of the De Kock argument by only quoting the total runs of Amla and QDK, completely ignoring Moz’ reference to their averages. Or maybe he was hoping that no one would spot what he did there. 

The bigger picture tells a different story though. Amla has a higher series average than QDK. In addition he also has one more “not out” than QDK. And, bear in mind, he played in one less game than QDK. Amla has a series HS of 80, QDK’s HS is 68. Oh, and BTW, QDK got a total of  253 in eight games, and not 293 like brother Mike would have us believe. In one more game than Amla as well.

Now, I’m not at all trying to suggest that QDK was useless and Amla brilliant in this series so far. I’m just saying that QDK was not brilliant and Amla useless like Ou Tokkie would like us to believe. They were pretty much the same with Amla our third best batsman, on average, and QDK fourth. Faf and Van Der Dussen are first and second so far. 

SA batsmen in CWC so far.

Amla was not out twice in games that require smallish total runs.  That makes his average looks better - but per game he ws crfap in 5 games played of the 7 played,  

Ceradunce

Get this straight - what was Amla's batting strike rate?  Was it in ODI's played or in test cricket? Hell a low scoring rate is as bad as a low score made by a batsman.   Your deficient knowledge of rugby and cricket should not be shown on this site - dofdoos. ,    

I gave the stats on site before the last game his strike rate was  59.   In the game Mozart went  gaga it was 76 so we van work it out pm average as  follows: -

59x7+80  =    493  divided by 8  = 62.   So argue on stupid.  Mozart really foumd he co uld not get away with it - but you carried on with it. 

Mozart

Take the number of runs scored at the rate he scored them in all games played - before the last game it was 59,    The last game took it up to 62,5.

It is very easy to do - add up the total number of runs Amla was credited with an multiply by 100 and divide same by the number of balls faced.         

A strike rate of 64,85 is BAD and USELESS  in ODI's.   That is why when Amla played and did make some runs is bad and normally lose matches.  But in only 2 matches did Amla scored some runs and in the other 6 he flopped badly.

All out strike rate is meaningless by 2019 - when he should never have been in the WC squad.    

No I do not have Markram as future captain - it is likely to be De Kock.

If he tried o bat faster he was out soon.   He was never fine this WC series - he was totally unacceptable.   Do you understand the difference between tests and ODI c4ricket - your comments indicates you do not?

By the way this was the third World Cup Amla played in and he failed in all three,

. 

Not in WC series BSitter

You are the biggest fool I ever came across in WC team selection and you never ever learn from your own mistakes - be it rugby or cricket,