1 Rabada(3 Tests 20 wickets)
2 Jansen(3 Tests 19 wickets)
3 Cummins (5 Tests 24 wickets)
1 Rabada(3 Tests 20 wickets)
2 Jansen(3 Tests 19 wickets)
3 Cummins (5 Tests 24 wickets)
Agree with you about that selection when based on averages. The difference is that India is still a top performing team - while England became a joke.
Maaik, we'll see soon just how bad England is at home.
The problem is it is not how bad England was - it is the way they lost the matches that shows poor performances. Now they claim there is racism in the English cricket squad - that is the lowest any cricket authority can go.
Just to put things into perspective, Starc took exactly the same amount of wickets(19) as Rookie Marco Jansen but he took them over 5 tests whereas Jansen took his in 3.
Starc won the prestigious Allan Border medalist award for his performance in the Ashes ser ies.
Well all the players mentioned above had a good series and we trust that the Proteas bowlers have as much success in the following series against NZ (?) and England.
Starc's first ball of the Ashes was the winner for me.