So lets analyze the above BS of Mozart, I left Miller out of the above averages, but his average is also 50 - and he and De Kock (the 7th ranked ODI batsman in the world) have been the targets of Mozart's insane attacks.
Mozart is a crazy age maniac and whenever players are selected to replace the seriously defective players retyring from the game - the replacements affectively has been near to retirement incompetents. For instance - he supported Elgar - the 33 year-old - who is now the Proteas test captain. The first team Elgar captained after his appointment as Protea captain was the Titans in the local 4 day final and the Titans lost the final by an innings and 78 runs despite the fact that the match was played over 2,5 days due to rain, Elgar's contribution in 2 innings was 27 runs - definitely an important part of the dismal Titans failure Having said that - I have never once seen any support for Malan by Mozart - he is way too young to be supported by Mozart/ anyway.
As to support of Verreyne his statement about support is laughable . Verrynne is a middle order batsman and wicketkeeper - so is Klaasen. Although Mozart try and hide it - his support of Klaasen to replace De Kock has been consistent with his past behavior. So where his support for Verreynne came from is really a joke in bad taste - is better still it was none-existent. Fact is that it was exactly opposite to what he now claims. When I wrote that Kallis and Verreynne who went to the same high school - and mentioned on site that Verreynne broke all the batting records set by Kallis at the school - Mozart nearly had a seizure. So his support for Cerreynne never existed.
So what went wrong in team selection since 2018 leading to the Proteas free-hall in the world rankings? The answer is simple - the wrong players have been selected to play for the Proteas team and there was every effort made to ensure that players under the age of 30 in the case of batsmen and 28 in the case of bowlers are not selected to play for the Proteas, It had nothing to do with actual performances and everything to do with experience,
Since selection was to chose between performances on provincial level should be the norm.. So lets as an example look at he averages of klaasen ansd Verreynne :-
4 day games 50 over games 20 over games
Klaasen 43,78 36,19 27.53
Verreynne 56.32 36,74 25.72
If the averages on the present Protea players and the potential replacements are made - the same type of information emerges in all cases bar in the cases if players like Markram and De Kock.
So what went wrong causing the decline in Proteas cricket? I will be blunt - shit team selections.