25 Mar 2015, 22:18#2
Ag for fark sakes Mike, get a grip. How is that different from your monotonous banging on about Morne Steyn, Frans Steyn, Victor Matfield, Willem Alberts, etc, etc, etc. You are one of the biggest farking hypocrites I have come across in my entire life. You are forever on about and accuse others of the exact same things that you are continuously keeping yourself busy with.
DBDbDraad
Captain26,388 posts
DBDbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
26 Mar 2015, 20:45#5
Aag Mike, give it a rest. This is going nowhere. Both sides have some valid points and both are wrong on some issues. Why do you blokes keep on flogging the poor old dead donkey?
DBDbDraad
Captain26,388 posts
DBDbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
27 Mar 2015, 09:25#7
Moz, I'm talking about your strife in general, not only the De Kock issue.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 Mar 2015, 09:42#8
Wehe . . . Moffie claiming he took the "opposite view" that we would destroy NZ.
This is the same stinking liar who slagged off the Proteas after they lost to "only New Zealand" in the warm up game, the same fork-tongued fibber who ridiculed my post where I said the Black Caps where the team I'd least like to meet in the CWC and the ignorant twit who has consistently dismissed their chances.
In a previous post I said watch this shameless liar suddenly claim he rated the Black Caps all along . . . and sure as nuts, here he is trying to pretend he is their staunchest supporter and greatest fan.
LMAO!
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
27 Mar 2015, 11:14#9
Got to love the fact that the very reason we lost the semi was because of the poor efforts of Steyn and Philander - this fact seems to have been missed by good old Moz.......for him it was de Kock opening and keeping and JP as our 5th bowler.........bwhaaahaaaaaaaaaa.......classic ignorance
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 Mar 2015, 14:32#11
I wonder what kind of limited education a person had if by the age of 75 he still doesn't know the difference between "hoodoo" and "vodoo" (sic)?
LMAO!
DBDbDraad
Captain26,388 posts
DBDbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
27 Mar 2015, 23:20#13
Moz, we made the semi's four times in previous WC's, difference being, there were no QFnals in those years, straight to a semi from the group stages.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
28 Mar 2015, 06:43#15
Draad, we'd actually only been in 3 semifinals before this one . . . 1992, 1999 and 2007 . . . but still, imagine someone not knowing we'd been in a single CWC semi before yet still pontificating about cricket?
Sounds like someone has a bit of a "vodoo" when it comes to sports knowledge!
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahaha!
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
28 Mar 2015, 22:17#16
Of dear. I make my posting, about the semis, which was an embarrassing mistake...given I have watched the 99 game several times. The very next posting RooiAAs who always seizes on any crumb I leave him attacks my use of voodoo....but never gets the mistake. Showing clearly he had no clue I had made a mistake. After Draad pointed it out and he no doubt googled it...suddenly he is the "expert".
The AAs produces another classical foot shot.