FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Andrew Weissmann After Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Trump Immunity Claim: Jack Smith’s “DC Case is Now on Life Support” (VIDEO)

Andrew Weissmann After Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Trump Immunity Claim: Jack Smith’s “DC Case is Now on Life Support” (VIDEO)

Started by Beeno11 REPLIES303 VIEWS· 01 Mar 2024, 06:17
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Mar 2024, 06:17
#1
01 Mar 2024, 06:17#1

All the bogus legal cases against Trump aimed at getting him off the ballot are failing.

However is not enough for them simply to fail. These activist judges and prosecutors must be jailed for long terms and made to pay big amounts in respect of damages.


I see Letitia James is now going after the biggest producer of beef in the US all in the cause of the man made climate change hoax. The WEF Globalist want us useless eater munching away on ze bugs. Bran washed loons like Sharktwit and poor Blobbie are salivating at the prospect. However this case if successful will once again to enormous damage to New York which is of course the real intention of the Globalists. Destroying America's largest city would be a big win for them.


Demonrats never prosecuted Trump on these issues because they wanted the prosecutions to happen near election time to damage trump. Now they complain about delays. Bwahahahahhahahahahahahaha


Watch the video here:


Smith case on life support


Corrupt prosecutor Andrew Weissmann appeared on MSNBC to discuss the US Supreme Court’s decision to agree to hear Trump’s immunity argument in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s January 6 case in Washington, DC.

The high court will hear oral arguments on an expedited schedule the week of April 22 and decide by the end of the term in June or sooner.

Judge Tanya Chutkan postponed the March 4 trial date indefinitely as Trump’s immunity argument makes its way through the courts.

Jack Smith’s January 6 trial may be postponed past November and Mueller’s ‘pitbull’ Andrew Weissmann isn’t taking it well.

“By granting the stay, [SCOTUS] is essentially saying that [Trump] is de facto immune,” Weissmann said to MSNBC’s Willie Geist. “…And I think it ends up being that they’ve given a win to Trump here, and I think they’re gonna give a win to Trump in the Colorado case as well.”

“They have given Trump the win. The DC case is now on life support. It is really really hard to figure out how this case gets to trial before Election Day,” Weissmann said.

Weissmann falsely claimed Trump was charged for “illegally staying in office.”

In August Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.

WATCH:

Weissmann and other Trump haters on the left are attacking the Supreme Court for ‘delaying’ Jack Smith’s DC case.

Jack Smith’s cases against Trump were brought years after the so-called ‘crimes’ took place because the trials were meant to disrupt Trump’s election bid.

Joe Biden waited too long to appoint Jack Smith as special counsel and Judge Tanya Chutkan waited two months before she responded to Trump’s immunity argument.

If Trump really committed these crimes and the goal was to bring Trump to justice, he would have been charged many, many years ago.

It appears Biden’s plan to convict Trump before the 2024 election is going down in flames.







CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Mar 2024, 21:25
#2
01 Mar 2024, 21:25#2

Beeno

The charges against Trump in all cases were of no judicial value since thy are based on near to zero from a judicial perspective.   The progam for chargies was co-ordinated by the WH and the Justice Department.  

Democrat politicians are known for one thing  - they believe the lies they concocted are in fact true.     That is why they act like they do and hey believe the charges are real as well.   The usual media outlets support the Democrat an spread BS all the way.

Now lets get one thing clear - Smith initially approached the supreme court for a ruling  on the issue of immunity   They at the time send Smith give a lecture on judicial processes in the USA.    So the issue is back in the Supreme Court and now Weissermann is moaning  about it.

Nobody is really convinced that the charges are not part of a political ploy to be used to undermine Trump's electio  campaign and the fake media specialists are not really helping the Demmocrats and the strategy is failing badly.    

         

— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes