Arab Nato vs Arab Spring
However, is it worth getting involved with the Arabs? Today's ally is often tomorrow's terrorist. It seems the biggest gripe the Arabs have, is outside involvement from the west.
They don't like the West at all or anyone that is not Muslim. (Even if they don't like other Muslim Groups either).
Irak was a disaster, and it helped new Terrorist groups get into power. It might just be best to ignore them and let them sort out their own problems. Even if the West's intentions are 100 genuine (e.g. not motivated by oil deals).- the involvement is never appreciated by the Arabs, and grudges are held. Perhaps these states should just have self-determination to decide their own fates.
- A fox and a scorpion both need to cross a river.
- The scorpion asks the fox for a ride on its back as it cannot swim.
- The fox refuses saying “no you’ll sting me”.
- The scorpion replies that it wouldn’t, as they would both drown.
- The fox agrees and allows the scorpion to ride on it’s back.
- Half way across the river the scorpion stings the fox.
- As the poison takes effect on the fox and it starts to sink it asks the scorpion, “Why?”
- “Why did you sting me, now we are both going to die?”
- The scorpion replies, “I couldn’t help myself, it’s in my nature”.
Sharkbokkie disaster happens when you have radical muslim sympathisers like Clinton as Sec of State (plus her PA Huma Abedin being a radical muslim linked to terororist groups. She wanted to increase muslm imports by 550% on Obummers already high number)) and a muslim traitor Hussein Obummer as president and a muslim Cia director in John Brennan.
Those circumstances would definitely and certainly dd lead to disastrous ME policy - eg 150 Billion dollars given to Iran and them being put on a path to nuclear weapons etc etc.
Many Arab states hate Iran and want them contained. Iran is the biggest exporter of state terrorism in the world.
How bad is Trump making Obummer look. Try Obummer and then hang the treasonous snake.
Plus how many requests were there to Clinton to beef up security. That Clinton is not in prison for this utterly disgraceful conduct re Benghazi alone defies reason.
I would favour a ban on trade with them, and try to develop a replacement fuel for petrol/oil. They are a violent intolerant culture and they will argue with each other in the meantime. Rather place sanctions on them and just not trade with them, or get involved an of their issues. Hopefully, this will allow a natural resolution where their own people grow tired of their doctrine- a change for the better .
Sure any unprovoked attacks against other countries by them will be met with counterattacks.
Windpomp why not call it as it is - they are all part of the worldwide globalist wheel.
The big problem we have is who comes after Trump. Don't see anybody around who could stand up to these swine.