Things are not looking good for them in the latest Ukraine saga and it is getting wrote by the day. So lets look at what they came up with in the case:-* First of all the CIA recently changed the requirement from whistleblowers from having first hand information so as to allow for hearsay evidence being provided as legitimate - sometime after May 2019. This was probably done for use in a new controversial move against Trump after the collapse of the Russian Hoax.
* Then the story broke about the Trump telephone conversation with the President of Ukraine and the manufacture of a whistleblower report started, The report was made by a lawyer used by Senator Schumer based on a "report" he received from a whistleblower - who to this day nobody knows the identity of. It is apparent that the so-called whistleblower report was drawn up in collaboration with the DP leadership cadres - wjo knows exactly what was in the report.
* The problem with that was that when the DP insisted on a report from the whistleblower be heard by the House the report should not have been with them already - but Schiff made remarks that indicated he did know what was in the whistleblower report,
* When the Whitehouse made the transcript of the telephone call available a new story had to be concocted to the effect that the recording of the telephonic discussion was "caged" and the whistleblower than added a paragraph dealing with the "caging" to his report. The change was made after the release of the transcript. However, what then came out that all telephonic discussions are "caged" because of leaking of the telephonic discussions between Trump and the Australian Prime Minister and the President of Mexico in 2017. It had zero to do with the Whistleblower report at all..
* What really happened was that Trump never threatened the President of Ukraine about defense aid at all. The President of Ukraine himself stated that there were no threats made by Trump. That was invented by the whistleblower as an allegation so as to represent a case of criminal misdemeanor,
* The Ukrainian President brought up a problem Ukraine have with bribery and corruption involving US citizens and Trump responded by saying he is aware of the involvement of the Biden's in Ukraine and it sounded like very bad to him. He then promised to work together with the Ukrainian Government to deal with the issue. Th criminality not also deal with bribery and corruption - but also written threats to the Ukrainian Government as to financial assistance by the Biden and more recently by three Democratic Senators saying that if the Ukrainian Government does not co-operate with the Mueller investigation the financial assistance to Ukraine will cease.
* As to money voted for assistance of the military equipment Trump held it up for two reasons namely, the use of money illegally through bribery and corruption and Trump's insistence that the EU also roved such assistance. However, Senator Portman went to see President Trump before the telephone discussion took place about the issue and it was then decided to release the money.
* The whole issue exposed the role of the Biden's in Ukraine. It is only right that the President asked that a matter involving the previous Vice-President in potential bribery and corruption be fully investigated, He would really neglect his duties not to do so, Trump did not interfere in any elections process involving Biden - the DP is campaigning at present before their nomination process starting in January 2020,
* The problem also that when Schiff chaired House Committee meeting - he totally misrepresented a series of things that was proven to be untrue and when confronted he said that what he did was a parody. This is bound to land him in trouble legally.
The problem is that it is crunch-time for the DP. There are a number of reports coming out that will expose real criminality on their part and that would really represent a major scandal. So they had to do something to use as a lightning conductor,