The Globalist want full control of the narrative Elon says No.
Will this result in the EU being eventually blocked ftom using Twitter.
Take a look at what is hapoening.
The Globalist want full control of the narrative Elon says No.
Will this result in the EU being eventually blocked ftom using Twitter.
Take a look at what is hapoening.
What squeaks ou sharktwit. I love my news censored. At least then I know I am getting the truth. Agree says ou Rooitwit. Musk has gone rogue. Fancy thinking free speech is a right or even necessary. Our rulers know what is best for us.
A more subservient, compliant weak mind two twits would be hard to find until you met Blobbrain, stavASS and poor old crust! Hahahahahahaha.
Nope they can beam into the EU via Starlink. Can the EU stop that.
Happily it shows the World how anti free speech these Globalists are.
Meanwhile the rest of the World can enjoy Twitter.
That said Elon still needs to fully clean house and fire all radical leftist mods who have no clue what free speech means. Very arrogant bigots.
Nope they can beam into the EU via Starlink. Can the EU stop that
ROFL
My bad then.
Still, screw censorship.
The IP addresses at Starlink are dynamic(constantly changing)...not geographic. The best the EU could hope for is for Musk to put a badge on Twitter that says "Tweet at Your Own Risk".
This would be the nail in the coffin...
The second generation of Starlink satellites will provide smartphone users with access to satellite Internet at speeds from 3 to 18.3 Mbit/s.
What it is about.
As very usual, it is not about freedom of speech, but control over censorship (it aint censorship when they do it, only when others do it)
For simple minded people, only a fool would believe that a guy who has his hand deep in censorship (especially when the speech is about him) would promote something else than censorship.
Guy discovered that in terms of cost reductions (one of his mantra to increase rentability) the vast internet space is better when the least moderated, cost much less.
Another of his brilliances was to sell that the idea that a space designed to support under a thousand character posts is the place to be when wanting to debate.
A place designed to support commercial slogan type of things is the place to debate, this or the end of civilization.
One difference between Nazis and Liberals: Nazis were straightforward about theirs ways, (they had an office for propaganga for example) Liberals prefer to dress things.
What is happening: on one hand, guy will have to kiss goodbye to money his tweeting system earns in Europe (guy also implemented a certified status people may pay for, certified source as long as it can be bought), on the other hand, liberals who make a living/money off the tweeting system will have to kiss goodbye to it.
Who caves first.
Credit is given when credit is deserved.
The lack of committment by liberals to their own supposed principles never ceases to amaze.
So this liberal can not consider putting off line his internet services in countries that he considers as dictatures. Freedom of speech must recede before tyranny.
Yet in liberal countries, in countries those laws he disagrees with are the result of people voting, this guy feels like imposing his will.
Guy can respect the will of tyrants but can not respect the will of voters.
Liberal all the way down.
As a reminder, liberal societies started as slaver societies that declares being not a slave a universal unalienable right to every human being.
Liberals have always been the worst offenders against theirs own principles.
The Tradionalist
In one book it was written that even when you dress up a liberal in satin and silk he remains a pig prepared to break his own principles.