Epstein's Announced Squad List

Trump was named vice captain...

The Epstein List: Names Mentioned in Unsealed Documents

Recent unsealed court documents and released flight logs related to Jeffrey Epstein have named a large number of individuals. It’s important to note that inclusion in these documents does not imply wrongdoing; many were referenced as acquaintances, business contacts, or were named in passing. Below is a list of notable names who have appeared in various Epstein-related legal records, flight logs, or courts filings as of 2025:

Prominent Public Figures Named

1. Bill Clinton (Former US President)
2. Donald Trump (Former US President)
3. Prince Andrew (Duke of York, British Royal Family)
4. Hillary Clinton (Former US First Lady and Secretary of State)
5. Al Gore (Former US Vice President)
6. Ehud Barak (Former Israeli Prime Minister)
7. Bill Richardson (Former Governor of New Mexico)
8. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (US Politician)
9. Les Wexner (Former CEO of L Brands, business associate)
10. Jean Luc Brunel (French model agency boss, co-conspirator)

Celebrities and Academics

1. Leonardo DiCaprio (Actor)
2. Kevin Spacey (Actor)
3. David Copperfield (Magician)
4. Chris Tucker (Comedian and Actor)
5. Michael Jackson (Musician)
6. Stephen Hawking (Physicist)
7. Mick Jagger (Singer, The Rolling Stones)
8. Cate Blanchett (Actor)
9. Naomi Campbell (Model)
10. George Lucas (Film Director)
11. Noam Chomsky (Linguist, Philosopher)

Legal and Business Associates

1. Alan Dershowitz (Lawyer)
2. Tom Pritzker (Businessman)
3. Glenn Dubin (Investor)
4. Eva Andersson-Dubin (Former Miss Sweden)
5. Sarah Ferguson (Duchess of York)
6. Marvin Minsky (AI pioneer)
7. Jo Jo Fontanella (Butler)

Accusers, Witnesses, and Staff

1. Virginia Giuffre (Accuser, previously Virginia Roberts)
2. Annie Farmer (Accuser)
3. Maria Farmer (Accuser)
4. Sarah Kellen (Assistant; named as an unindicted co-conspirator)
5. Adriana Ross (Assistant; named as an unindicted co-conspirator)
6. Nadia Marcinkova (Alleged friend, assistant)
7. Ghislaine Maxwell (Convicted accomplice)

Other Names Reportedly Mentioned

1. Cameron Diaz (Actor)
2. Bruce Willis (Actor)
3. Sharon Churcher (Journalist)
4. Mark Epstein (Jeffrey Epstein’s brother)
5. Emmy Taylor (Maxwell’s ex-personal assistant)
6. Brent Tindall (Chef)
7. Doug Band (Clinton aide)
8. Frédéric Fekkai (Celebrity hairstylist)
9. Peter Listerman (Model scout)

This is a selection from the more than 100–150 names reportedly referenced in files, flight manifests, or contact books associated with Epstein. Many names appeared simply because they had some contact with Epstein—via professional, social, or other connections—rather than any implication of criminal actions. The naming of these individuals has been the subject of significant public scrutiny, and most have denied any knowledge of or participation in illegal conduct.

Note: No official “client list” has ever been produced by law enforcement, and the US Justice Department reported it has not uncovered such a document.

Additional Details

Surely they should just release financial transactions as well? The money is what will really prove who is a customer, as they would have to explain what it was for.

You had me at Stephen Hawking!

Im sure he had a full on Diddy Party with all of them!

-------

funny, i tried the same thing but my ai wouldnt let me create the pic. it said i was going against their policies.

If you try https://grok.com/

There is nothing about Tump other han the fact that Trmp as his own private jet which was being serviced and he needed to tavel from his home in Florida to New York for business purposes. At the time Epstein was still a member of he Mar-el-Lago club and he offered Trump a lift on his plane to New York. After his business was completed his own jet collected him for the flight back home. That was the only time Trump was on an Epstein flight.

A few months after that Epstein pestered a 17 year-old female employee to get her into his employ and she complained to Trump and he inmmediatly cancelled Epstein's club membership and when he found out that a nominee he made for a cabnmet position in 2017 was a lawyer who reached an agreement with Epstein in 2008 letting Epstein walk free - he cancelled the nomination. So try again SB - you put in Trump's name into your bizzarre list,

--

Why are you alays inly post shot about Trump on site, You have no rpoof that Trump was involved in anything related to Epstein. Zero proof of anythig ther than what was quoted by me. The sick Bde administration would have ramed some real charges against Trump if your story hadany basis,

So why avoid the real shit like Obama after the 2016 election co-ordinated a coup attempt against Trump through the Russian Hoax lies, Hundreds of documents now released proved what was going on and Obama and his fellow criminals will serve life sentences in GITMO. And as a syucker yu beleived all the lies that was concoced wle there were no colusion between Trump and Putin.

The problem the USA face is that any future president can do the same at the end of his term of ofice What Obama did is totally unconstitutional and aimed at destruction of dmocdracy in he USA. .

@DumbMike, we do not know who on that list is guilty - but it is certain that some of them are.

Epstein's customers are made up from the very richest people, the 0.001% of richest people.

I assume if Biden was in the list, he would have been guilty...It goes to show how important this was for the dumb people like yourself, until your master has been listed amongst the other people.

----

dfgh

bnm,bbb

Strooihalms...gonna backfire spectacularly...

One wonders how. Liberals have so much distorted language they mean nothing. How could this backfire... What outcome could lead to backfiring?

-

Bookies have their 5:1 to get a pardon

Incredible stuff... As a reminder, one main blame laid by liberals on the previous brand of regime was that King or Queen was outside of the reach of justice, which they were. Beyond that, history shows that everyone else was submitted to justice, not even a king's direct family was out of reach. Liberals claimed every one had to be submitted to justice and peeps, see what it is happening, more and more people are getting out of reach. South Africa is a prime example with hundreds of thousands of people if not million people getting out of justice's way by merely putting to pen their assaults of human condition. Now the US are caressing the idea of pardoning this woman. Incredible stuff, the stuff liberal societies are made of. Liberals hate on humanity, liberals hate on civilization, they enjoy destruction, cruelty, sadism, war... And never want to be he held accountable.

Only in your deranged mind...suck it up arsewipe.

The TRUTH.....TRAD.

---

Wow Shark

Scraping the barrel here to get something Negative about Trump...and going after his wife is only going to p!$$ him off...I'll be careful what I post snarkhole...liabel can be costly...

Yeah.... that is low even for you Shark

Snarkhole is too brainwashed to even realize he's been fooled by Chinese infiltration of all Western educational institutions...ek bid Trump roei die Sjinese invloed wortel en tak uit...en dan sommer ook die Islamiefiseering van Westerse lande....ek het genoeg gehad van die k@k...die lyn moet dringend getrek word, voor dit te laat is.

Puleeze...

--

Actions have consequences...you being a small fish might slide, but you never know... ;-)...still POTUS!!!

---

Snark, you seem to be fooled easily...

-

Well now, here's the challenge, bullshit yourself out of this Donnie....can't see that happening. Alternatively come clean, matter of fact he's probably too deeply immersed to arrange another cover up.

The f'kng clown's more court jester than POTUS.

Snark, it's on the internet, so it must be true...the Dems had access to everything Epstein for 4 yesrs...if there was anything remotely incriminating against Trump, it would have neen all over the news years ago...if the best they have is to yell cover up when there is nothing to cover up....

I see the 2Ders are so focused on Trump potentially fondling some girls that they completely ignore the rest of the Epstein story.

The Dems knew that Trump was going to win the election. They'd have sacrificed their children to prevent that happening.

My feeling is that if Trump was implicated, they'd have found a way to get that info to the public.

But lets assume that Trump was playing a 19th hole on Epstein Island...and that Epstein records and tapes(which there would 100% be), and that the investigation revealed this. That would be the silver bullet and see the Dems win the election.

...why wouldn't they use it?

I'm left with two options...

1) Trump isn't implicated, or...

2) Trump is implicated but the Epstein rabbit hole is so deep that it goes beyond party politics and even the race for the Whitehouse.

Here is Chat's summation...

"While we don’t have smoking-gun proof of intelligence agency involvement, Epstein’s case doesn’t resemble that of a lone criminal. It has all the hallmarks of someone deeply embedded in the machinery of power, and potentially being used — by others or for his own ends — to compromise and control influential individuals.

So, in my view: he wasn't just a financier or sex offender. He was a node in a much larger and murkier network. The full extent of that network is still hidden — possibly by design."

Trump should definitely release all the Epstein files though

It was part of his campaign promise, so it makes him look like a liar and with possible implications of involement when he doesn't act on what he said he would with these files.

But to stoop this low with involving Melania is disgusting, unless somebody has confirmation of this with proof.

Make no mistake, the Dems would have used absolutely anything that they could find in those Epstein files, to stop Trump from getting a second term, so I don't for one second believe that there is anything in the files to damage Trump, because Biden, Obama or Clinton would have definitely used it or brought it up.......yet it is baffling that Trump still won't release them.

"It was part of his campaign promise, so it makes him look like a liar and with possible implications of involement when he doesn't act on what he said he would with these files."

No it wasn't...he should release everything he can while still protecting the identities of the victims, but he did not campaign on it.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/issues

Go check that list and compare it to his actions over the last 6 months.

What utter tripe by Draad. Of course, Trump campaigned on it, as did many Republicans and their surrogates.

The Trumpanzee species were the ones who wanted the list more than anyone - to take down the rich and famous (not just for justice of the original crime).

We know that some people are guilty, all of whom are from the richest 0.01% of society.

These people are too well-connected and powerful within the establishment.

Trump may well be guilty- he has, after all, known Epstein well, and for a very long time.

This is far beyond left wing versus right wing; it is the billionaires versus everyone else. They own many of the politicians, or they are just a cliche that looks out for each other's intertwined interests.

It kind of sums up American politics, where the majority argue over ideology - the billionaires from both sides are laughing all the way to the bank.

@Draad, did you notice that the last screenshot I included was from Elon Musk's new political party - "The American Party"?

"Go check that list and compare it to his actions over the last 6 months."

I did look, but that list doesn't really mean anything

No it wasn't...he should release everything he can while still protecting the identities of the victims, but he did not campaign on it.

In my eyes, he definitely did

During Trump's 2024 campaign, Trump was on the Lex Fridman podcast last year in September, and he said that he would certainly take a look into the Epstein files.

In June 2024 during an interview with Rachel Campos Duffy from Fox News, he was directly asked "Would you declassify the Epstein files" to which Trump replied "Yeah, Yeah, I would"

Whilst Trump may not have put it down as an official act of the president in official terms if he reached the Oval office again, he certainly referred to wanting to do it a few times whilst out campaigning.

Here is a list of verified public incidents and statements when Donald Trump, before winning a second presidential term (i.e., during the 2024 campaign through Election Day), campaigned or was on record promising to release the Epstein files:

Key Incidents Before Trump's Second Term Win

June 2, 2024 – Fox & Friends Interview

1. Trump was asked about whether he would declassify Jeffrey Epstein files if elected; he replied, “Yeah, yeah, I would. I guess I would. I think that less so, because you don’t know—you don’t want to affect people’s lives if there’s phony stuff in there, because there’s a lot of phony stuff in that whole world”.

September 2024 – Lex Fridman Podcast

1. When asked again if he would release the files, Trump responded, “I would have no problem with it.” This was considered one of his most direct on-the-record campaign promises of disclosure.

General 2024 Campaign Stump Speeches (late 2023–2024 primary season)

1. Trump and his surrogates (e.g., Kash Patel, Dan Bongino) repeatedly referenced Epstein and promised to “get to the bottom of it” and “expose the truth” during primary rallies, although Trump himself more often let allies stoke these expectations to the base, while he was less explicit in main rally speeches.

February 21, 2025 – Fox News (Pam Bondi)

1. Although after the new term had begun, this event referenced Trump’s campaign directive: Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Fox News that “the [Epstein] client list is sitting on my desk right now to review. That’s been a directive by President Trump.” However, she later clarified this to refer generally to the tranche of documents, not a specific list, but this bolstered the perception among supporters that Trump campaigned on the promise of transparency about Epstein’s connections.
2. 
   

Summary Table

Key Context

1. Trump’s personal campaign statements about releasing the Epstein files were most prominently made in media interviews and podcasts, often as a response to direct questions, and less often as a headline campaign promise in rallies or policy platforms.
2. Surrogates and campaign allies were more aggressive in promoting the idea that a Trump victory would lead to full disclosure.