PLPlum
Captain21,007 posts
13 Sept 2022, 19:30#4
I have always thought that Trump was treated like he was because he wasn’t beholden to the 3 letter agencies.
As time passes, i only see more evidence to support this line of thought.
Think about it. Why would the FBI want to protect Hunter? There’s no real benefit in it for them. Unless they have a vested interest in who runs the USA, there is zero reason why they should want to be biased.
Even assuming that they believe MAGA is fascist. Were they not biased then they would still investigate the Biden story with urgency.
They spent how much investigating, with great urgency, a completely fabricated dossier, claiming that Trump was a Russian asset. They squeezed as much juice as they possibly could out of that lemon and still came up empty.
FFS, if the vice president(Biden) of the USA had been compromised by the US’s biggest adversary…how is that of such littler interest? And they had the laptop for god knows how long. The best investigative agency in the world couldn’t track email IPs, validate photos, texts etc? And let’s not forget that what(PRISM) Snowden exposed…means they have full access to all of Hunter’s communications, search history and everything else. It’s very damn obvious that they have been trying to bury the story. All because they admire Jo Biden that much?
And in amongst all that you have the Epsteins of this world.
I’m starting to think that most of these politicians are owned by intelligence agencies and when they run cover for them they’re simply protecting assets.
It’s the only thing that explains all of it.
Why would you want power seated in persons that the public can elect? Much better to have unelected lifelong agency workers run things, further from public scrutiny and picked for purpose.