FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Foreign Intelligence Special Court flays the FBI while the DP says that the FBI was rght in investigating the Trump campaign

Foreign Intelligence Special Court flays the FBI while the DP says that the FBI was rght in investigating the Trump campaign

Started by clevermike0 REPLIES268 VIEWS· 18 Dec 2019, 23:41
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
18 Dec 2019, 23:41
#1
18 Dec 2019, 23:41#1

The FISC court gave  a new ruling that us really unbelievably harsh on the FBI and it is becoming increasingly clear that the FBU had an agenda to get an investigation going on the Trump campaign and the more verbal evidence came out of the second Senate Hearing, the more the DP squirm about the situation.   


Before the report came out contents were all over the media.  With great fanfare CNN and the others announced that there were good reason to investigate the Trump campaign  and that the FBI was duty-bound to investigate the campaign,   However, as it became clear that the situation was different and they made fools of themselves in siding all out with the FBI and blame Trump for attacking the FBI.   The first hearing they did not like what came out - so the version was edited and they started off by cutting out the speech of the Chair of the Justice Committee amd edited out questions asked by Republican Senators.   


What Horowitz said was that they could not find written evidence that confirm bias - but they could not accept the reasons provided as they were not convincing at all.   He also said that nobody was vindicated - as stated by Comey,   It is already clear that there was bias and CNN and co decided not to report anything on the hearing today at all.  


However, it is becoming clear that Durham will have a lot of criminal cases on his hand and that hell will break lose sooner rather than later.    


In the meantime Rep Slotkin of Michigan said she is duty bound to support Impeachment of Trump - but her reasons became clear.   She was a CIA agent and her husband is still one - how deep is the Deep State anyway?   She won the previously held republican seat in 2018 and one can be certain she used her CIA credentials to the full to prove that she is not a reactionary.   Her voters told her off in a meeting - but she still persist in supporting impeachment.                                        

— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes