FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  HUGE! Author of Ridiculous Imperial College Coronavirus Study Backtracks – Says UK can Now Expect Under 20,000 Deaths Not Half a Million and LESS THAN ANNUAL FLU DEATHS!

HUGE! Author of Ridiculous Imperial College Coronavirus Study Backtracks – Says UK can Now Expect Under 20,000 Deaths Not Half a Million and LESS THAN ANNUAL FLU DEATHS!

Started by Beeno15 REPLIES283 VIEWS· 26 Mar 2020, 23:08
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
26 Mar 2020, 23:08
#1
26 Mar 2020, 23:08#1

Oaks what was I telling you. THEY HAVE BEEN LYING.


THIS IS A SHOCKING DEVELOPMENT!


There are two main organizations behind the global coronavirus panic.
** One was World Health Organization’s Director General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who claimed in a press conference in early March that the fatality rate for the coronavirus was many multiples that of the fatality rate of the common flu. Ghebreyesus claimed the coronavirus had a 3.4% mortality rate and incorrectly compared this inaccurate number to the annual estimated flu mortality rate of 0.1%.(AS EXPLAINED)

** And the second organization was the Imperial College study from London that claimed half a million Brits would die in the pandemic and 2 million Americans would perish from COVID-19.

They were both wrong.

And on Thursday Neil Ferguson, who was behind the Imperial College coronavirus study, backtracked and now says 20,000 Brits may die from the coronavirus and half of those would have died by the end of the year anyway.

The estimated average of flu deaths each year in the UK is 29,000.

So the experts are now expecting less deaths than the flu!

This is quite a swing from the original study that set off a global panic.
So when will these jerks get sued?

Alex Berenson tweeted out this thread:

1/ This is a remarkable turn from Neil Ferguson, who led the @imperialcollege authors who warned of 500,000 UK deaths – and who has now himself tested positive for #COVID; https://www.newscientist.com/article/2238578-uk-has-enough-intensive-care-units-for-coronavirus-expert-predicts/ …

2/ He now says both that the U.K. should have enough ICU beds and that the coronavirus will probably kill under 20,000 people in the U.K. – more than 1/2 of whom would have died by the end of the year in any case bc they were so old and sick.

3/ Essentially, what has happened is that estimates of the viruses transmissibility have increased – which implies that many more people have already gotten it than we realize – which in turn implies it is less dangerous.

4/ Ferguson now predicts that the epidemic in the U.K. will peak and subside within “two to three weeks” – last week’s paper said 18+ months of quarantine would be necessaryhttps://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/196477/j-ideas-neil-ferguson-tells-mps-lockdown/ …

5/ One last point here: Ferguson gives the lockdown credit, which is *interesting* – the UK only began ita lockdown 2 days ago, and the theory is that lockdowns take 2 weeks or more to work.

6/ Not surprisingly, this testimony has received no attention in the US – I found it only in UK papers. Team Apocalypse is not interested.


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
27 Mar 2020, 18:07
#2
27 Mar 2020, 18:07#2

This was a disastrous bit of statistical incompetence in a sea of bad statistical analysis......99% of all scientists doing their thing!

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
27 Mar 2020, 19:15
#3
27 Mar 2020, 19:15#3

Incompetence or willful disinformation and fearmongering? I know it sounds of tinfoil hat stuff, but when does these "blunders" become statistically impossible? This is serious stuff. The whole world is shutting down on the back of dodgy data...convenient...

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
28 Mar 2020, 13:40
#4
28 Mar 2020, 13:40#4

Draad NOBODY that hold positions like these people do could possibly that ignorant.

With flue they estimated 39 million people being infected and dvd not report. With the Wuhan iirus they made no estimate of people infected and dvd not report it. 80% of people have NO symptoms are so mild they don't report it.

Recognise lies for what they are and recognise the very obvious agenda.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
28 Mar 2020, 17:04
#5
28 Mar 2020, 17:04#5

So far in the UK there are 1000 deaths after 2 full on months of the virus....I wonder if they will have to back track on their 20000 deaths as well.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
28 Mar 2020, 20:58
#6
28 Mar 2020, 20:58#6

Sharp observation Dr Moz. 

The peak flu months in the USA are December through to March. I guess similar to the UK. So rates of infection and deaths should decline. 

The WHO stats show also that there are usually 650.000 deaths a year from flues. 

The NH IS where the action has been so can't see these figures or anywhere near this level of deaths. 

The Globalist media will have difficulty in keeping this hysteria going too much longer. 

By the way Italy year by year also has a far higher desth rate from flu. Some 8%.

Moz just saw a brilliant clip that goes on to quote a top Stanford University Professor of Epidemiology and Stats. It's about 1hr 40 minutes long but totally shreds the media narrative. 

Although the Wuhan Virus is real and has caused death the flu may be just as or even more dangerous. There can now be no doubt the media is spinning this and lying big time. 

The clip quotes WHO, the CDC, Dr Fauci and provides stats etc. Great bit of work. 



— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes