FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  It used to be Scotland the brave. Now its the land of the

It used to be Scotland the brave. Now its the land of the

Started by Beeno13 REPLIES427 VIEWS· 01 Apr 2016, 14:06
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Apr 2016, 14:06
#1
01 Apr 2016, 14:06#1
transgender weirdoes!The level of depravity of the atheistic "mind" continues to surprise. "Professing themselves to be wise the became fools"  Its enough to make you want to puke.I sometimes wonder if the arrival of all these muslims isn't God's judgement. Its getting like Sodom and Gommorah in parts of Europe.I AM SHOCKED TO LEARN SCOTLAND IS IN SUCH A DECADENT STATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AS part of her package of plans on the issue the First Minister will ensure teachers undertake training on equality so they can tackle prejudice-based bullying in schools.

NOCOLA Sturgeon has promised to review and reform gender recognition law for trans people as part of a series of commitments on LGBTI equality.

But her plans – which have the support of all the political parties at Holyrood – have outraged the free Church of Scotland who accused the Scottish Government of trying to "destroy the traditional idea of gender".

The SNP leader has outlined plans that will make Scotland one of the first countries in Europe to give legal recognition to people who are neither male nor female.(What the heck are the dears!!!!)

Sturgeon has also pledged "refreshed, age-appropriate strategies and resources" for children to promote tolerance and respect, and prevent prejudice about healthy relationships."

Under her plans, guidance and promoted teachers will also undertake training on equality so they can tackle prejudice-based bullying in schools.

Sturgeon said young people should be supported to make informed choices about their gender and sexual identity.

READ: Transgender Brooke Olsen plans to quit her home in Peterhead over abuse on the streets

The commitments were welcomed by equalities organisations.

The Scottish Transgender Alliance said the review of gender recognition law could allow young people to legally change their gender, with their parents' support if they are under 16.

Sturgeon outlined her equality pledges ahead of an LGBTI (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex) hustings event with the party leaders in Edinburgh.


In addition, an SNP government aims to ensure that every professional working with children is trained on equality, addressing prejudice-based bullying, child development and child protection.

Police officers will also receive appropriate training on the investigation of hate crime.

Sturgeon said: "I'm proud that Scotland has made significant progress on LGBTI equality in recent years, however the very fact that we are still having debates like this at election time just underlines that there is still much that we need to do.

"In particular I want to see a renewed focus on areas such as education - both for young people themselves and those responsible for their emotional and educational wellbeing.

"Tolerance, respect, inclusion - these are attitudes and principles we want to encourage and foster in modern, fairer Scotland.

"Enabling young people to make informed choices about their gender and sexual identity is about supporting them to be themselves so that they might fulfil their potential.

"I am hopeful that in the next Scottish Parliament we can build as much consensus on LGBTI issues as we did in this session - and take another leap forward for equality."


James Morton, manager of the Scottish Transgender Alliance, said: "We are very pleased to see the SNP pledge to reform gender recognition law for all trans people, in line with international best practice.(AND IF YOU DISAGREE WITH BEST INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE ITS HATE SPEECH. WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER!)

"That would mean enabling people to change the gender on their birth certificate without intrusive medical diagnosis, recognising trans people as the experts on their own identities.

"It would allow young people to legally change their gender, with parents' support if under 16.

"It would also mean the law recognising that some people have a non-binary gender, that is they are neither men nor women."

"We hope that the other parties will match this commitment and we look forward to working on this with whoever forms the next Scottish Government."

At the hustings event in the capital the plans received cross-party support with all party leaders backing a review of gender recognition law.

Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson said: "I want to get to a stage where absolutely every teacher in every school in Scotland feels equipped to be able to deal with these issues because every child needs to be able to trust the people in their schools."

But the Moderator of the Free Church of Scotland, Rev David Robertson, said the SNP are seeking to destroy the traditional idea of gender.

He added: "The SNP seem to be working on the unproven and somewhat bizarre notion that children get to choose their own gender and sexuality.

"We believe that this will result in confusion and brokenness amongst our children rather than fulfilled potential."(MILDLY PUT)

He added: "This is nothing less than state-sponsored indoctrination of the weakest and most vulnerable members of our society."

Rather than being diverted into this particular dangerous ideology, the SNP should be far more concerned about real equality in education where under their stewardship the gap between rich and poor has increased."



BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Apr 2016, 20:49
#2
01 Apr 2016, 20:49#2
 Now we have this remarkable incident in a so called Jesuit University!!

Professor John McAdams of Marquette University appeared onBreitbart News Daily Friday morning to discuss his defense of traditional marriage, and how politically-correct enforcers arethreatening his position at the university.(note these tewits are said to be politically correct - the mind boggles)

Sirius XM host Stephen K. Bannon pointed out that Marquette is a Jesuit university, and wondered how a position in defense of traditional marriage could make trouble for a professor at such an institution.(Where is that nutter they call they Pope one wonders)

“I didn’t actually even defend traditional marriage,” McAdams said.  “Simply the right of a student to defend traditional marriage without being bullied and demeaned.  That was the whole point about my blog post.”  In that post, McAdams described the case of a student who was told to drop a class by an angry leftist professor, who exclaimed that defending marriage between men and women was intolerably “homophobic, racist, and sexist.” (Why is a moron like this teaching at this university one has to ask!)

As for so-called Catholic universities, first you have to understand that Jesuits are thin on the ground these days,” (Surely they should raise the alarm about the institution being taken over by atheists!) McAdams continued.  “The president of Marquette’s not a Jesuit, the provost isn’t, the dean of arts and sciences isn’t… there are so few Jesuits that so-called Jesuit institutions pretty much aren’t run by Jesuits.”

He added that the Jesuit order itself was no longer a “bastion of Catholic orthodoxy.”  This left universities like Marquette to suffer at the whims of “whatever fads prevail in academia generally.” (Yup and these fads get more disgusting each year. Next oe wont be able to be a professor unless one is a transgender freak!!)

For example, if it’s pandering to the gay lobby, they’ll pander to the gay lobby, and they’ve done so a lot,” said McAdams.  “If it’s pandering to racial minorities – blacks, American Indians, Hispanics – they’ll do that, too.  And, like all universities, there’s kind of a confluence of ideology and bureaucratic interest – that is to say, the administrators who run the university have an interest in hiring bureaucrats that work in their offices, so they’re always very happy to hire another assistant provost for things Hispanic, or associate provost to set up a bias reporting system, which Marquette has now.”

The once-great institution of Marquette has been hit especially hard by political correctness, but McAdams warned there was a general trend of “nonsense in academia” sweeping through institutions of higher learning across the country, citing the example of Emory University students claiming they “felt so hurt and were so unsafe” because someone “put pro-Donald Trump messages on the sidewalk.”

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA HOW TRULY PATHETIC IS THAT. GIVE THEM A DUMMY AND SOME EARM MILK SOMEBODY. HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 

As for his own case, McAdams reported that Marquette University said they would suspend him without pay for the remainder of the calendar year.  He would be allowed to return in January, “if I abase myself and apologize” for his blog post.

He also said he would be required to “promise to adhere to Marquette’s guiding values and mission statement… which of course, in my view, I’ve done.”

Unfortunately, McAdams noted the bureaucrats at Marquette seem to interpret their mission statement not as a high-minded commitment to academic inquiry and free expression, but simply as, “you don’t make trouble for the institution.”

Professor McAdams declared he would not make the apology demanded by P.C. enforcers.  “I’m not going to sign any ‘loyalty oath’ to Marquette’s mission – since I’m, in fact, probably a stronger proponent of Marquette’s claimed mission than the people running the university,” he chuckled.  “But I’m against loyalty oaths. Interestingly, a lot of older liberals remember loyalty oaths in the 1950s, where professors were required to swear they were loyal to America and had no sympathy for Communism… liberals hated that.  And now what you have is a liberal administration at Marquette demanding a loyalty oath from me.”

He declared his determination to fight the university, cheerfully noting that his lawyers are working pro bono, so “Marquette can’t run me away by having me build up huge legal bills.

“I think it’s pretty clear, the odds are there’s going to be a huge lawsuit,” he predicted.

Well this is what happens when atheists start to get their way with things. As you walk away from the light every perversion becomes more and more natural.


BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Apr 2016, 21:01
#3
01 Apr 2016, 21:01#3
Now this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Huffington Post senior editor Chloe Angyal gave her “less joyful” winner of the week Saturday on MSNBC, calling the newly signed law in North Carolina that forces people to use public bathrooms that correspond to their biological sex a “banner week for bigots.

“This was a banner week for transphobic bigots,” Angyal stated. “This was a real win this week for people who would pit cisgender women against transgender women in the name of women’s safety, the people who are saying by protecting the safety and dignity of transgender people we are opening the door for sexual violence against other women

It gets crazier and crazier with the se atheists

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Apr 2016, 21:09
#4
01 Apr 2016, 21:09#4
 But back to Scotland. Real men like Wallace must be turning in their graves! How can Scotaland have sunk this low. Its been achieved by the globalist elites brain washing media and capture of universities etc.

Glasgow Police have threatened social media users, ordering them to be “kind” and not “hurtful” unless they want to “receive a visit… this weekend”.

Using the witty acronym ‘THINK’, and the hashtag #thinkbeforeyoupost, they cautioned people to consider whether something is true, hurtful, illegal, necessary or kind before sending.

Responding to the tweet, users took to their keyboards, mostly expressing ridicule at what they considered the force’s ludicrously wide scope.

Picking up on the ‘THINK’ acronym’s warning over “unnecessary” activity, one user queried what action the force will take if a tweet is thought to be “unnecessary”. Another quipped that, if “unnecessary” social media activity is inadvisable, then the police force’s Facebook and Twitter accounts should be shut down.

The ominously totalitarian tone of the tweet will come as little surprise to those familiar with Scottish police who have form on the matter.

Just weeks ago columnist Katie Hopkins was investigated by the force. A Scottish nurse had been treated for Ebola and the television personality joked: “Sending us Ebola bombs in the form of sweaty Glaswegians just isn’t cricket”.

Police Scotland received a series of complaints and thousands of people signed an online petition calling for action to be taken over the “racist tweets”. However, a spokesman later declared: “An investigation has been carried out and on this occasion no criminality has been established”.

In February this year Scottish Police arrested a 41-year-old man under the Communications Act after receiving a report of a supposedly “offensive” comment made on Facebook regarding Syrian migrants.

The man was from the tiny Isle of Bute in the Firth of Clyde, which has a total population of just 6,498 and was expected to take in around 1,000 Syrian migrants. Commenting on the sudden and massive change is now all but impossible for locals.

A police spokesman was unequivocal, that any harsh criticism of the Muslim influx would not be “tolerated”. Inspector Ewan Wilson from Dunoon police office told the Guardianfollowing the arrest:

I hope that the arrest of this individual sends a clear message that Police Scotland will not tolerate any form of activity which could incite hatred and provoke offensive comments on social media.

But the force’s heavy handedness may be viewed as hypocritical, as their most recent retweet at the time of going to publish was about them failing to take any further action against an Imam who had shared approving messages about a Pakistani murderer.

Imam Maulana Habib Ur Rehman (Glasgow Central Mosque) reportedly used WhatsApp to show support for Mumtaz Qadri, a murderer who was hanged after killing a Pakistani politician for opposing Islamic blasphemy laws. Mr. Rehman called Mr. Qadri a “true Muslim” because of his actions, though he latter insisted the comments were taken “out of context”.

Police Scotland said it had reviewed the messages but said “ no criminality has been established”.

It is unclear as to whether or not sharing this article would constitute an “unnecessary” post. But it may be worth finding out.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes