FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  John Brennan Suppressed Intel Saying Russia Wanted Hillary Clinton to Win

John Brennan Suppressed Intel Saying Russia Wanted Hillary Clinton to Win

Started by Beeno11 REPLIES251 VIEWS· 13 May 2020, 16:26
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 May 2020, 16:26
#1
13 May 2020, 16:26#1

Too bad demonrats you lost!



Fox News’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump.

Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggest that John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.

Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22:

House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.

Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment.

On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report.

For three years, the received wisdom in Washington has been that 17 intelligence agencies concluded that Russia had interfered in the election to help Trump win. It then transpired that only four agencies had actually been involved.

The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by embattled Republican Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), issued a report last month that appeared to confirm the work of the intelligence agencies.

However, that conclusion may soon be contradicted.

President Trump has accepted the claim that Russia interfered in the election — though he does not believe Russia actually helped him win, and he has publicly cast doubt on the idea that Russia preferred him over Clinton, his Democratic rival.

Breitbart News noted in 2017: “[T]he Russians may just as well have preferred Hillary Clinton, who had given Russia everything it wanted while serving as President Barack Obama’s Secretary of Statefrom the ill-fated “reset,” to a surrender of U.S. missile defenses in Eastern Europe, to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium reserves to a Russian company closely tied to the Russian state.

This could be a bombshell,” Henry told Carlson on Tuesday.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
14 May 2020, 11:57
#2
14 May 2020, 11:57#2

Beeno

This is old news,   It was widely known in the USA that the CIA, FBI and the Obama Administration knew that Clinton was Putin's real candidate in the 2016 election,   So they conspired with the aid of the media to accuse  Trump on what they were in fact doing themselves,   

As sure as hell Obama. Biden, Pelosi and Clinton was part of the complot since they were afraid of what exposure of the real dealings between the Russians and themselves may come out if Trump wins the election.   The Russian Hoax campaign was aimed at a determined effort to stop uncovering of their own corruption.

The walls are closing in on the crooks - not so Rooinek?   

  

— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes