John Ratcliffe - UFO disclosure

Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe revealed Friday that an upcoming report will disclose that government officials have recorded more unidentified flying objects that are “difficult to explain.”

Ratcliffe’s remarks boost expectations for an upcoming government report about UFOs put into motion by the second pandemic-related stimulus bill.

The law, signed into law by former President Donald Trump last December,
forced U.S. spy agencies and the Pentagon to disclose what they know about UFOs to the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services Committees within 180 days.

What did Ratcliffe say?

Speaking with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Ratcliffe explained what the government report could disclose.

“There are a lot more sightings than have been made public. Some of those have been declassified,” Ratcliffe said. “And when we talk about sightings, we are talking about objects that have seen by Navy or Air Force pilots, or have been picked up by satellite imagery that, frankly, engage in actions that are difficult to explain. Movements that are hard to replicate that we don’t have the technology for or traveling at speeds that exceed the sound barrier without a sonic boom.”

Ratcliffe added that government officials have attempted to find a “plausible solution” for the UFOs — but admitted “there are instances where we don’t have good explanations for some of the things we’ve seen.”

“There have been sightings all over the world,” Ratcliffe explained. “When we talk about sightings, the other thing I will tell you is, it’s not just a pilot or just a satellite, or some intelligence collection. Usually we have multiple sensors that are picking up these things, and some of these are unexplained phenomenon, and there is actually quite a few more than have been made public.”

What say you Viskop?

Any chance of some pictures of these UFOs, ButtPlug? You know, ones like the hubcap someone threw in the air and photographed that got you all worked up and excited the last time .

LMAO!

I want one...

 "...for or travelling at speeds that exceed the sound barrier without a sonic boom."

Sounds like technology from planet Meton.

Come on ButtPlug, give us some pics!

Pics, egg white wiping...

How many Freudian slips can one man make?

Stop dodging, ducking and diving in your usual cowardly manner, ButtPlug, if there are all these UFOs then surely someone has some pics, pictures, photos or videos. No?

Read the above. Apparently someone does have pics. 

The F do earth ending prophecies have to do with things armed forces have recorded and can't explain?

Haha you simpleton!

"Stop dodging, ducking and diving in your usual cowardly manner, ButtPlug, if there are all these UFOs then surely someone has some pics, pictures, photos or videos. No?"

"Read the above. Apparently someone does have pics. "

"How many times have we heard this tabloid stuff that all is about to be revealed by aliens, and it does not happen...

Lol Draad

These two are certainly the most predictable gimps anywhere.

Didn't you know, Draad?

Our two pals here are better  equipped to sum up the phenomenon than intelligence communities and the armed forces.

All about the science...when it's comfortable. And only then.

What plonkers.

Lol Plum, Rooi's no gimp...hy's 'n tier...just ask him...the original "figjam".

"All about the science...when it's comfortable. And only then."

It's all about what some scientists, whom they want to believe, tells them...as if they will be able to discern a subtle lie...or even a not so subtle one...they believe in "science" as I do in Jesus...only I have a lifetime's experience to go with my beliefs...

Let's assume that one of the branches of the armed forces releases radar, video and IR footage of vehicles doing the manoeuvres described by Radcliffe.

RedTit and VisNek will demand...show us pictures and video. The latest in radar and tracking equipment and confirmation of the phenomenon by the worlds most advanced militaries is not enough. It may be good enough for the Navy but they're all idiots. Hahaha

Now I wonder, is it dislike for me, fear of the unknown, inflexibility of mind or pure stupidness that could cause two people to ostrich so hard?

Rooi explains ancient precision work, like the flattening of granite surfaces to within 1/10000 of an inch, through claiming slave labour over time. This despite modern humans only being capable of such precision for the last 60 or so years and we still can't manage it without electricity...Not even close. IE manpower = precision, according to RooiNarchist. You don't have to be an engineer to understand that force over time does not by default result in high precision, it never has. But RooiTit is happy with his explanation.

Shark explains the ex-director of NI in the US statements regarding UAPS via doomsday prophecies. Even an idiot knows these two things have 0 to do with each other.

Our two great respecters of science are entirely bereft of logic and an understanding of potential. However, most critically, they are incapable of changing their minds even in the face of evidence that baffles people a hundred times smarter than them.

I believe this is what's called being married to one's worldview.

They interpret "What is that?" as "This is what that is."...despite no claim being made.

The mere question frightens them and so they need to twist it into something that it isn't in order to appease themselves. 

And the plankness keeps a'coming.

Still waiting boys...any time you'd like to offer an explanation...I'm all ears.

.

I thought the question was pretty simple.

Again...

"What say you Viskop?"

"What say you Viskop?"

Okay well, I didn't know that's what you called me now. I thought Viskop was your name for Sharkbok . . . but anyway, my answer is as I alluded to earlier, if there are so many more UFO sightings that people don't know about, then in this day and age where most of the world's adult population carry mobile phones with excellent cameras, I'd expect a lot more pictures of these UFOs. Wouldn't you?

There, I've answered your question. Now answer mine.

Nope, you haven't answered anything.

I posted an article and then asked what say you? 

Obviously, as regards the information that Radcliffe is referring to in the article and NOT in relation to the public taking pics of ET with their Samsung...which is not mentioned anywhere in the article or in my question. 

Wanna breathe and try again?

Don't lie now ButtPlug. Stupidity and deceit are not a very good combination. Just look at ou Maaik.

You did not say "what say you?", you said "what say you, Viskop?" and I've already explained to you what most people know, that you call Sharkbok Viskop so put on your big boy pants and retract your lie, then I'll explain to you how I've answered your stupid question while you've dodged mine like the weak coward you are.

Okay?

So dumb. Of course it was addressed to VisKop AKA StinkVis AKA VrotVis.

That's was never in doubt nor pertinent. 

Now, wanna put on your big boy panties and finally get to the point?

Ummm . . . so why are you now lying and saying the question was for me?

Hmmm? It's not a trick question.

All questions and information available will be released by President "Bunker" Biden at his first news briefing today at the White House.

I am sure that this is one of the questions submitted by a reporter to the White House for screening prior to the TV disaster about to unfold.

The President sure has had enough time to prepare and rehearse the questions and answers submitted as requested.

Being a Super Space Cadet he will amaze all his loyal Zombies followers with his answers no doubt.

What a disaster this "Prick" has turned out to be thus far.

But loved by the folks in central America.

13H00 Eastern Sharkie and Rooi for the latest "Blabbing Bunker Blunder Bullshit Biden Blowout".

Trust he has no stairs to climb.

Oops!

"Ummm . . . so why are you now lying and saying the question was for me?

Hmmm? It's not a trick question."

Whoosh, you as ocial...

He's asocial and atit.

Are you ready yet RooiNaartjie?

Or did you dig too deep a hole to drag your chubby self out of?

Funny how the coward of all cowards projects his worst traits on to others.

I'll summarise his cowardice here...

1) Rooi "...try to frame your nonsensical drivel into something that resembles a question."

2) Plum "I thought the question was pretty simple.

Again...

"What say you Viskop?"

3) Rooi ""What say you Viskop?"

Okay well, I didn't know that's what you called me now. I thought Viskop was your name for Sharkbok . . . but anyway, my answer is.."

4) Plum "Nope, you haven't answered anything.

I posted an article and then asked what say you?"

Note the use of italics for emphasis. Went totally over the poor fool's head.

5) Rooi "Don't lie now ButtPlug. Stupidity and deceit are not a very good combination. Just look at ou Maaik.

You did not say "what say you?", you said "what say you, Viskop?"

6) Plum "So dumb. Of course it was addressed to VisKop AKA StinkVis AKA VrotVis.

That's was never in doubt nor pertinent."

So, even though it was clear that the question was to Viskop, and even though I pasted the question directly...IE it is present twice on this thread...attempting to clarify the question for the wriggling little worm makes me a coward and liar.

What a complete and disappointing loser you are, RooiTit.

I guess those big girl panties don't fit you any longer. 

Aren't you embarrassed?

Hmmm . . . but you did say this . . .

"Still waiting boys...any time you'd like to offer an explanation...I'm all ears."

Right?

So why the plural? Why "boys" and not Sharkbok?

You've made a dick of yourself yet again ButtPlug . . . and - hilariously - your little Gimp the Squeaky Toy is too stupid to realise it!

LMAO!

Funny thing though, Plum … is that even though the Abominable Snowman exists … as well as the Yeti and the Lock Ness Monster … no one’s ever captured an in-focus image of any of them … not even with the high powered, high-tech cameras and lenses we have today.

Why is it always out of focus?

The alien craft that zoom around all the time suffer with the same issues … and to be honest, this doesn’t bring credibility to all these sightings.

All we need is one in-focus pic …

Oh, yes. 

How dare I open the floor for you to join in, however pointless a task that may be, considering almost every one of your "contributions" of late.

All hail! RooiTit...The King of losers.

Grow up man.

Ag it's always the same thing with you ButtPlug, you get yourself all worked up and into a state because no-one's answering your stupid questions but you don't phrase it as a question or else you aim it at someone else.

Get someone with a double digit IQ to read this thread and explain to you where you dropped the ball.

PS Klown, that was a very long sulk . . . even by your standards!  

Howzit CC!

Haha trust the UFO topic to draw you back haha.

If you search UFO pictures on Google, I'm guessing you'll find plenty of clear ones.

However, in the age of Photoshop and CGI, one can't really trust pics or videos. I demonstrated this to Shark and RooiTit recently and it went way over their heads. 

It's more the military cases that interest me since there are often multiple recordings from ground and air based radar, combined with IR footage from fighter jets and then also the pilot's testimony and verified recordings of the communication between the pilots and other involved personnel as the event transpires. Corroboration on top corroboration.

I'm not putting it past armed forces to lie to the public in order to garner consent in terms of funding for whatever the latest arms race is. As I understand it, weaponising satellites is and has been the at the core of the present arms race. Perhaps they're lying about UFOs to get the public to agree to put weapons in space.

Basically, any way you look at this, it's interesting...

# military are lying to the public and perpetuating a UFO hoax.

# the craft they are witnessing belong to some earthly entity.

# the craft they are witnessing are from somewhere else.

I can think of a few more options but they seem way too unlikely.

Anyhow, each o f the three possibilities above are pretty interesting.

"Get someone with a double digit IQ to read this thread and explain to you where you dropped the ball."

Says the coward who's copping out...again...Rooi-chicken!

RooiTit

The great projector.

Best is, the poor darling thinks it isn't obvious

At least he hung around for a minute. Viskop dropped some garbled nonsense and then ran for the door like the house was on fire.

Could one of you pathetic little clowns please articulate the actual question that was asked to me that I dodged. Thanks.

If that question is "what say you Viskop?" then man up and say that was the question.