FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Kyle Rittenhouse - is he soon going to be a multimillionaire = and a very wealthy one like Sandmann?

Kyle Rittenhouse - is he soon going to be a multimillionaire = and a very wealthy one like Sandmann?

Started by clevermike4 REPLIES233 VIEWS· 07 Jun 2022, 05:09
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 Jun 2022, 05:09
#1
07 Jun 2022, 05:09#1

The US Courts are going to be fun to watch over the next three months - even though the Sandmann case never reach the Courts because the  media owners panicked and make offers to settle the claims.   So far the Washington Post, the New York Times and CNN paid out huge amounts that could be as high as $100 million.

Then we have the Rittenhouse case - where the claims are against Facebook and most of the mass media.   This could even result on massive settlement claims because what was said by the media and facebook is more serious than what was said and written about the Sandmann case.    It is also going to  hurt the Democratic Party and especially the hornest nest of corrupt individuals in that Party.

The third case that is going to hurt the Democrats worse than the other two is the Trump Case where billions are claimed for the lies dreamed up by the DNC and the Clinton election campaigns  without any proof whatsoever - the FBI, the Clintons and the media about the Russian Hoax.   That will also include professional liars like Schiff and Swallwel whose statements to the media fe ll outside of Congressional Privilege.        




   

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
07 Jun 2022, 05:17
#2
07 Jun 2022, 05:17#2

"However, another ten year renewal was due in 2014 and Obama did squat about it - so the ban lapsed."  

Another pathological lie, it was Bush who scrapped the ban not Obama.

Care to correct your pa thetic lie or are you going to pretend as per normal that it doesn't exist?

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 Jun 2022, 05:45
#3
07 Jun 2022, 05:45#3

In any event - there were numerous newspaper reports on the issue in 2014 that inidicatted that Obama did squat on the issue.   He could not because it would impact on the BLM and Antifa terrorists he supported all out.   There was nothing stopping him from implementing the original ban by Clinton.  I based my comments on what was in the media on the issue when Obama was the corrupt and crooked president of the USA..   

In fact I was wrong about the statement made iro Bush and apologize for that.   Bush was as big a crook as Obama was.   His war in Iraq - they are still looking or the weapons of mass destruction which  Mueller - you remember him from the Trump special council appointment to deal with the myths  started by the Democratic Party about Russian Collusion  and found nothing after spending millions on a farcical investigation. - in a sworn statement before the Senate claimed existed, which caused the start of the USA attack on Iraq. in 2003.         

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
07 Jun 2022, 05:56
#4
07 Jun 2022, 05:56#4

Oh really? how convenient to overlook the fact that it was G.W. Bush who had first choice  as the sitting POTUS to renew the ban in 2004. 

Your bias and credibility stinks.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 Jun 2022, 06:23
#5
07 Jun 2022, 06:23#5

No Denny

I did apologize for my mistake - but what i do not understand is the fact that the media and the corrpt in the Democratic Party are going to suffer from libel claims stemming from them that caused endless investigations.

What about the Sandmann, Rittenhouse and Trump libel claims that is going to cost the media and the crooks in the Democratic Party hundreds of millions and may ensure that the fake media .will be more careful in spreading lies in future?      

I despise crooked politicians like Clinton, Bush, Obama and Biden  - there are plenty written proofs of their corruption - they s hould all have been in jail years ago.   

— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes