Liberals rely on institutions. They support an institutional system. Credibility of institutions is mandatory for their system. In a brutal way as liberals demands as a duty to overthrow tyranny. And an institution losing its credibility is a sign on ongoing tyranny.
This basic remark gives a clear cut on the US institutional malfunctions and failures. Liberals in order to keep pretending must maintain a semblance of their institutions credibility. Which means institutions can be revealed too openly as inefficient.
It is what happened for the Gazza case. The rest of the world want to get rid of the UN as this institution is essential cogs and wheels to diffuse the US influence over the world. The UN is the institution that has enabled the Gazza situation. The call for a cease fire happened when the rest of the rest of the world minus the US and Israel and ten weightless countries voted fro a resolution to be passed and imposed an immediate cease fire. And the UN situation is different as the rest of the world wants to get rid of he UN, they just want a pretext to get rid of it. The US and Israel had to save this essential institution for them so they stepped in. It is a difficult situation for liberals as if ever the rest of the world was getting liberal, the rest of the world should get rid of the UN by liberal principles. The UN is no longer acceptable for the rest of the world on liberal tenets. Liberals can not allow the rest of the world to become liberal. It is very funny.
The same happens in the US. The Trump administration can not afford that the many institutions lose their credibility. So these institutions will get victory points. If any institution fails to provide any semblance of efficiency, it will signal as pointless and one to get rid of by liberal tenets. Checks and balances do not work in the US. What it is being staged is a controlled and sustainable failure of checks and balances.
It is a very interesting case as liberals often point out at this kind of situations as evidences of a healthy system, revealing their frustration. Liberals have reached a point when a system not working nineteen per cent of the time is still deemed working too much.
Stated many times, liberals are en route to kill hundreds of millions people around the world as they keep stacking forces driving them toward this outcome. This is one of the many forces. It allows to perceive how genocidal tendencies are so strong among liberals.
This is how liberals have kept spreading injustice. Injustice is sweet when people ore on the right side of injustice. And an unjust system is maintained by conceding a few unjust outcomes. 100 unjust situations, liberals take 84 per cent for them and concede 16 against them. It ensures stability. But more and more, liberals can no longer bear these 16, they aim for 100 and until this happens, they keep claiming the system is unfair and that true, real justice can only happen when they hit the 100 mark.
It is the same for institutions in the US, they must score here and there, now and then or they would lose too much credibility.
Of course, it is just powder to the eyes and can not cover that checks and balances are failing big time in the US.