Mozzietard's hero Fauci Bombs out at Congressional hearing eg - Lawmakers: Anthony Fauci Admitted Six-Foot Social Distancing Was Based on Nothing

Many of you will recall, although mozzzietard won't, the videos where Fauci told various people at different times that masks do not stop a Coronavirus even N95 mask.

Now social distancing was based on nothing. 

Well established norms like herd immunity and natural immunity were IGNORED!!!

Fauci's chief defence was that he didn't remember. He used this excuse 100 TIMES.

He admitted that the idea that the virus originated in a lab in Wuhan was not a conspiracy something he had been saying before.

We have of course learnt that the vaccine that was said to be safe and effective was not safe and effective even after 5 shots, Indeed the more shots you took the worse off you could be. Very, very importantly the vaccines did not stop transmissions. So all the people who didn't take the deadly jabs were fired for nothing etc etc.

I am the science the hatter declared and ou Mozzzie clucked in agreement. Of You are good doctor. and thanks for all you have done to boost my Big pharma shares prices. Much appreciated.

Dr. Fauci’s transcribed interview revealed systemic failures in our public health system and light on serious procedural concerns with our public health authority.

looks forward to speaking with Dr. Fauci further during a public hearing this year.

Wenstrup said things became very “evident” following Fauci’s hours of testimony.

“During his interview today, Dr. Fauci claimed that the policies and mandates he promoted may unfortunately increase vaccine hesitancy for years to come,” he wrote, emphasizing that Fauci admitted the lab leak theory is not a conspiracy theory.

“Further, the social distancing recommendations forced on Americans ‘sort of just appeared’ and were likely not based on scientific data,” he said in a statement, concluding that the transcribed interview “revealed systemic failures in our public health system and shed a light on serious procedural concerns with our public health authority.”

“It is clear the dissenting opinions were often not considered or suppressed completely,” Wenstrup concluded.(TOTALLY AGAINST THE WAY SCIENCE IS DONE)

“Should a future pandemic arise, America’s response must be guided by scientific facts and conclusive data,” he continued:

THE COMMITTEE WERE FRUSTRATED BY FAUCI'S INABILITY TO RECOLLECT. FAUCI OF COURSE WAS LYING OAKS BECAUSE HE HAS LOTS TO HIDE.

THE NOOSE IS TIGHTENING.

Dr. Anthony Fauci claimed more than 100 times that he did not remember details about the pandemic response and origins during a House interview Monday regarding COVID-19 policies and funding decisions.

On the first day of a two-day closed-door interview before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Monday, Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), frequently evaded questions about gain-of-function research and the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), in a statement following Monday’s interview, said, “Dr. Fauci’s testimony today uncovered drastic and systemic failures in America’s public health systems” and that Fauci “had no idea what was happening under his own jurisdiction at NIAID.”

According to The Hill, Fauci offered “his expertise on preparing for potential outbreaks in the future.” But according to The Washington Times, he “couldn’t remember many details about his advocacy of lockdowns, his flip-flopping on mask mandates and his decision to allow government funding of gain-of-function research in China that might have led to the pandemic.”

Fauci “claimed he ‘did not recall’ pertinent COVID-19 information or conversations more than 100 times,” and “profusely defended his previous congressional testimony where he stated the National Institutes of Health (NIH) did not fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan,” according to the subcommittee statement.

Fauci also “repeatedly played semantics with the definition of gain-of-function in an attempt to avoid conceding that NIH funded potentially dangerous research in China,” the subcommittee stated.

Responding to Monday’s testimony, Rutgers University molecular biologist Richard Ebright, Ph.D., a frequent critic of gain-of-function research, told The Defender:

“Fauci repeatedly and flagrantly violated U.S. government policies implemented to protect the public from lab-generated pandemics. He lied — brazenly — to Congress about his policy violations in three Senate hearings in 2021-2022. He lied — brazenly — to Congress about his policy violations again yesterday.”

Investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker, who has documented attempts by Fauci and other government officials, federal agencies and leading scientists to cover up the U.S. government’s role in funding gain-of-function research in China, told The Defender he was not surprised by Fauci’s stance.

“As I documented over two years ago, Anthony Fauci has lied about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. That’s fine. People in Washington lie all the time,” Thacker said.

“But when he lied during a congressional hearing, wagging his finger at Senator [Rand] Paul … I knew immediately he had broken the law. His lies about this pandemic have been documented in multiple media outlets and I hope he is eventually prosecuted,” he added.

Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., professor of international law at the University of Illinois and a bioweapons expert who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, told The Defender Fauci should be prosecuted.

“Fauci knew exactly what was going on at the Wuhan BSL4 [biosafety level 4] and the University of North Carolina BSL3 — he was paying for it,” Boyle said. “He has repeatedly perjured himself in testimony before Congress. This is just more of the same.”

Boyle said Wenstrup should follow Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-Ky.) example and refer Fauci to the U.S. Department of Justice for prosecution for perjury. “Maybe we will get some action there now that the Wuhan cover-up is unfolding, as detailed in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book, ‘The Wuhan Cover-Up,’” he added.

The seven-hour meeting was Fauci’s first appearance in the House since retiring from public office in December 2022. He was accompanied by two of his attorneys and two government attorneys, according to The Hill.

The closed-door testimony was first announced by Wenstrup on Nov. 30, 2023. In the same announcement, Wenstrup revealed that Fauci will sit before the subcommittee as part of a public hearing later in 2024. That meeting has not yet been scheduled.

In his statement about Moday’s interview, Wenstrup said it was “concerning that the face of our nation’s response to the world’s worst public health crisis ‘does not recall’ key details about COVID-19 origins and pandemic-era policies. Nearly 1.2 million Americans lost their lives to a potentially preventable pandemic,” he added.

SEE THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:

FAUCI

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/anthony-fauci/

• Our Process

• Our Team

• Who pays for PolitiFact?
• 
  

 BB 

Are ymou siding with Dr Death Faucci in this case?     

Beeno

Anymbody over 70 years should never hold an office li.ke D r Faucci did - he was totally at loss what was going on aound him - so every day he had another storym.

What ahppened was a totald isaster fo dealing with the issue of the Covid Pandemic.    The false stories given out by Faucci and the US Health Department is pathetic.  Ev erything they de3clared as "conspiracy theories" - and that icluded the  real origin of the pandemic, wh ether masks actually works, and isolation actually needd.  Th media was pathetic a well - a protction record of lies the media spread. 

What is wriong  is the actions of  Faucci being involved in the funding by the UJSA Government of gain-in-function research  at the Wuhan Biolab is to my mind a criminal issue.   In 2014 Obama followed the example set by other countries worldwide to ban gain-of fu,nction research.    In January 2017 - days before he vacated the WH he - without informing Trump - cancelled the banning order.    When h e did th e latter he knew about what was going on at Wuhan - he unbanned the research to allow F aucci to continue funding  the research at Wuhan and he wante to cover Faucci from financing illegaliies by unbanning gain-of-function  research.    In any event Trump in 2021  found out  about the unbanning  by Obama he immediately re-instated the ban.  

F aucci will now play the dmentia problem he has for why he should not be charged for funding of he research.   He is in that on par with Biden.     Whatsh ould also be investigated is the flow of money to Faucci from the Pharma Induistry.    Th e whole issue stink of Government corruption and that will always last a long as the USA has a Democratic Party G overnment.

I thimnk the USA Government cannot use the Wuhan Lab anymore - but what about doing such research in Ukraine.    In that regard the USAfunded and built a new Bio-Lab in Odxessa.   There can be no dount that the idea for that lab was to ensure that gain-of-function research moved from Wuhan to Odessa.     There sh uld be an invetigation as to what exactly is doe in the  Odessa Bio-Lab and wh at at he 26 plus other bio-labs in Ukraine.   What is clear that all the Ukraine Bio-Labs is controlled by Washington. - at least that is rpoven by an instrutioon by Wahington that if he labs are unde hreat of being found i Ukraine all patogens developed needs to be destroyed to prevent it from falling in the ands of the Russians.    The russiand did got control over 3 labs  wh ere the written instructions to destroy the pathiogens  issued rom Wahington.   In one case the pathogens was not destroyed aqnd checking it in Russia foud that it was far more deadly then the virus developed in the Wuhan Lab - that was indeed the claim o he Rusian expets - which was set to the UN.    

 .                  .         .   .             

      .    

Clever you moron, HasBeen’s whole world revolves around a 78 year old man becoming President. Straighten up and fly right.