OUTRAGEOUS!... Top Experts Used by CDC Move Total US Coronavirus Deaths From 2.2 Million to 200,000 to 81,766 in Only 8 Days!

The CDC, Drs Fauci and Brix are making complete jackasses of themselves!

Could the markets be seeing through their BS? Almost 1 pm over in east coast USA and Dow

Jones is 4.9% up.

Last TUESDAY Coronavirus Task Force Response Coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx pushed the talking point that by completely locking down the US economy and American public, the US government and Coronavirus task force “experts” were able to cut the total coronavirus deaths in the United States from 1 to 2.2 million deaths to 100,000 to 200,000 deaths.

This is based on “models” by her chosen scientific “experts” — Chris Murray and the IMHE.

Here is the chart Dr. Birx discussed during the daily coronavirus press conference at the White House.

It shows an estimated 2.2 million US deaths.
Again — this was at the press conference 6 days ago!

There is not a single country in the world today with over 16,000 total coronavirus deaths.

On Sunday night the IMHE cut their numbers in half.

Today the IMHE model used by the CDC and Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauci estimate the total US coronavirus deaths to be 81,766 by August 4th.
And 81,000 by May 21st.

The actual numbers are already below their current models.

These people have shut down the US economy — put MILLIONS out of work — based on their rubbish reports!

Will these criminals ever face justice?

Even worse than the Imperial College models....modeling requires scrupulous honesty and an absence of bias. Many of these ‘modelers’ are activists first and statisticians second.

40 times wrong re ventlators. They very obviously had an agenda. To create as much panic as possible . So WHY did they do this?

... the models had'nt factored in social distancing by the looks...Dr Oz is the one to follow for the facts...

Nope....social distancing was factored into the models. They overstated the risk massively, just like the Climate models. These models  are being influenced by political considerations and this kind of modeling is so sensitive it’s easy to get the results the modeler wants.

Models can be very useful tools....but they work best to give you a range of predictions and sensitivity to key assumptions....notably absent from the modeling work on the virus and the climate.

Yes the distancing etc were all built into the models

But they like the climate change models have proved worthless. Yet climate but climate change nutjobs say sane people are science deniers for laughing at these absurd models. 

Who can forget the hockey stick graph or how Manhattan would be under water by was it 2015. Bwhahahaha. Man these clowns are a laugh a minute