"Prince" Andrew....

is no longer "Prince" Andrew....

I never follow the royal family, but this time the bastards have really outdone themselves.

Is the death sentence too much to ask?

Think there's a good chance that he'll spend time behind bars.

Epstein files could put him & Trump behind bars.

in fact ...

"Epstein files could put him & Trump behind bars."

Bob, if you really believe there is anything incriminating against trump in the "Epstein Files" you are even more delusional than I thought...The Dems had access for 4 years...if there was anything, they would have used it...it isn't rocket science.

It's awfully suspicious that he's U-Turned on his promise to make the files public knowledge. Musk must know the truth but he's decided to go the diplomatic route.

If there is enough supporting evidence to nail Andrew, then they should, and lock him up .... I don't believe a single word he has ever said about the whole Epstein scandal.

As for Trump, the Dems had to make up something as disgusting as the Russia collusion incident to try and make Trump look bad to the American people before the election, so I can assure you, if there was anything even remotely tying Trump to Epstein, in any small way at all...... it would have been used by the Dems many many years ago....

It's not rocket science to comprehend that

Denny

It as nice to say he would release everything about Epstein in speeches - but there are legal issues that nreeds t be bornme in mind. S ome girls involved do not want to see their names draged hrough the mud and the Justoce Department must approach the woman invlved to get their opinion on releasing of documents they may be involved in.

On the other hand there are also charges against people must be fully investigated and charges laid against not only Edward Mountbatten Windsor and Bill Clinton bt other cutomrs for having sex with minors.that should not eb dvertised in the press, That could lead to nullfying of the charges if the trial is domne in public.

If Trump was guilty of anything the Autopen Regime would have not laid or tried to lay the fake charges they ltried against Trump last year of which none was of any substance. Th court through out charge he FBI and Smith tried to undermine their own court case and threw it out.- two ccases has been appealed and the onme where a decision was already heard and thrwon out of court. The other one is even worse and bound to be dismissed with costs aa well, Smith fucked up the other case badly and never laid the charges, He had no evidence and then had the phones of 10 Senators illegall monmitored and he is in deep shit himself. The obkect of the D emcorats was to try and get him off the Republican Party candidate in the 2024 election and that failed,

The No Kings campaign is a farce as well. They know it is BS and the f at is they try their own form of dictatorship to get rid of opposition, They underminmed the US Constitution openly when the were in power - now they are accusing Trump of what they were guilty of themselves.

...unless it's an intelligence agency wot was behind Epstein. Then, exposing Trump, or anyone at his level, could result in the leaking of the entire list...and the names on the list are from both parties, because if you were such an agency, you want to implicate people on both sides.

Not saying Trump is on the list. Just that, if he was, it's not an impossibility that the Dems might choose not to leak it. Threat of mutual destruction and all. It could be an intelligence agency running the show and telling everybody what to do and when to do it.

Conspiracy theory again - total BS as expected Follow the elgal route before you release documents that could be part of charges to be laid and rease of the documents can sabotage judicial process,

SB

The Rioal Family has a problem - the number of working royals has been reduced to the King and Queen - both old and sickly - eaving only Princess Anne - lso nearing retirement age, William and Kate and Edward and Sophie to deal with literally thousands of welfare orgnizations and in mkaing state visits requested by the UK Cabinet,

The son and daughter of Prince Edward and Sophie to be granted Prince and Princess titles so the can work with him and Kate as working Royals. James is now Earl of Wessex and his sister has no title and is known as Lady Louise Mountabtten Windsor, Edward and Sophie tried to keep their chidren out of view and living as naturally as possible an ordinary family life aimed at becoming active in their own future jobs in the private sector where titles create problems - that is why Princess Anne's children have no titles and that is not a handcap in their private business operations.

There arre very close ties between William and Kate and Edward and Sophie. The four are very down to earth and mix easily with ordinmary people. Sophie was very close to Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip and she was the favourite of both. Prince Philip left Lady Lousie has racing carriages and horses when he died,

Lady Louise worked in a nursery during the Universiy holidays and following her example her 17 year old brother will do their degree studies at the St Andrew University in Scotland as well. .

Kash has already said that certain court decisions prevented anyone from releasing certain information from the Epstein files, so not even Trump can circumvent that even if he wanted to.

I say it should all be released and let the guilty deal with it afterwards

I say it should all be released and let the guilty deal with it afterwards

For a change we agree. Flush the bastards out into the open.

I'm pretty certain that Trump's name is on the Epstein files numerous time as are probably many others but it doesn't prove Trump is guilty of a crime.

Gotta love this pivot by Trump and co that it's a ploy of the democrats. Yes they are using the Epstein files as a political weapon to attack him now but if this was the other way round you could be damn sure the Republicans would be the doing the same thing. The irony is Trump cultivated the support of the conspiracists and its coming back to bite him.

This was a political own goal from Trump, he promised to release the files and by not doing so he look's like he's hiding something and the Democrats are playing on that. It's absolutely not just democrats that want the files released though, polling shows a majority of republicans want them released as well.

"...unless it's an intelligence agency wot was behind Epstein. Then, exposing Trump, or anyone at his level, could result in the leaking of the entire list...and the names on the list are from both parties, because if you were such an agency, you want to implicate people on both sides."

Nah, they hate Trump enough to sacrifice a few of their own if they could just get rid of him...there's nothing there...it will be released eventually, in the meantime....kabuki theatre.

Bob, if you really believe there is anything incriminating against trump in the "Epstein Files" you are even more delusional than I thought...The Dems had access for 4 years...if there was anything, they would have used it...it isn't rocket science.

Absolutely. No man in history has been more investigated than Trump…..4 years of the FBI trying to find the dirt, 5 years of all the woke media which is 80% of the Western media….trying to find the dirt.

And……nada.

Trump is in the Epstein files, but that is not proof of guilt. Many other billionaires are also in the Epstein files - both left and right wing.. They will protect each other to protect themselves.

Even Elon Musk said that Trump is in the Epstein files.

Stav

Epstein was part of the billionaire and multi-millionaire social circle in New York - same as the Clintons. Trumps and many other poeple were, Epstein was also a member of the Mar-el-Lago club owned by Trump - so there is no dount that Trump knew Epstein quite well, That relationship was terminated when Epstein tried to entice a young girl working in the club to join his prostitute racket and she complained about it to Trump who terminated Epstein's membership of the club as a result, That was confirmed by documents relesed by the Club.

One of the potential cabinet appointees when Trump became President in 2017 was a lawyer from Florida by the name of Ken Starr, The problem was that the same lawyer represent Eptein as his lawyer in a court case in 2007-08 ending in Epstein getting away from the trial being a free man. Trump when finding about that withdrew the potential nomination of Ken Starr in 2017/

So your statement about Trump is 100% correct - he knew Epstein well and he once said publicly that Epstein deals with young girls - which Trump diid not approve of,

So Trump will be included in Epstein records and documents - but any court case proving Trump's conduct would not lead to any charges being laid, Others like Clinton and Bill Gates will end up in Court, Fact is Gates involvement with Epstein was the reason why his wife divorced him. That is how she ended up with half of Gates money and assets,

Other participanyts willa lso end up in court as well.

.

. .

Stav

Epstein was part of the billionaire and multi-millionaire social circle in New York - same as the Clintons. Trumps and many other poeple were, Epstein was also a member of the Mar-el-Lago club owned by Trump - so there is no dount that Trump knew Epstein quite well, That relationship was terminated when Epstein tried to entice a young girl working in the club to join his prostitute racket and she complained about it to Trump who terminated Epstein's membership of the club as a result, That was confirmed by documents relesed by the Club.

One of the potential cabinet appointees when Trump became President in 2017 was a lawyer from Florida by the name of Ken Starr, The problem was that the same lawyer represent Eptein as his lawyer in a court case in 2007-08 ending in Epstein getting away from the trial being a free man. Trump when finding about that withdrew the potential nomination of Ken Starr in 2017/

So your statement about Trump is 100% correct - he knew Epstein well and he once said publicly that Epstein deals with young girls - which Trump diid not approve of,

So Trump will be included in Epstein records and documents - but any court case proving Trump's conduct would not lead to any charges being laid, Others like Clinton and Bill Gates will end up in Court, Fact is Gates involvement with Epstein was the reason why his wife divorced him. That is how she ended up with half of Gates money and assets,

Other participanyts willa lso end up in court as well.

.

. .

It is another very funny, liberals are ready to tell all kinds of stories. Of course, remember, peeps, it is a serious case: human trafficking of under aged people. Liberals are the ones lacking the gravity to address it properly.

.trying to find the dirt.

And it was such a failure Trump is not a convicted person.

Kash has already said that certain court decisions prevented anyone from releasing certain information from the Epstein files, so not even Trump can circumvent that even if he wanted to.

It is another funny story because senate or congress are currently selling the idea that they could vote to get the files released. Something must yield here.

Bob, if you really believe there is anything incriminating against trump in the "Epstein Files" you are even more delusional than I thought...The Dems had access for 4 years...if there was anything, they would have used it...it isn't rocket science.

Remember, peeps, the greatest speculation of all is that liberals will sooner or later kill hundreds of millions of people around the world as they keep stacking forces leaving them fewer other choices.

This very short comment concentrates many of these forces. Just going through a few of them.

The submission: liberalism is all about submission. This comment is non sense and spewing non sense is one way for liberals to gauge submission.

Denial of immediate surroundings: the situation is that neither the democratic party nor the republican party released the files. It is denied here.

The Hegelian dichotomy: the situation is split as a republican or democratic problem, they blame each other for not releasing the files which advances the synthesis they want: the files are not released.

The dismissal of the rest of humanity : liberals are accountable neither to themselves neither to the rest of humanity, which they dehumanise.

The very idea that the Epstein files stakes are limited to liberals only and the rest of the world would not take the opportunity to make a statement is very present.

The remark was already made: Obama is a national traitor and Trump covers sex trafficking or himself is involved in sex trafficking. That does not spell a good name for liberals. Especially as liberals has made a business of taking the moral high ground. 250 years running and they end with a national traitor and a involved in sex trafficking of under aged.

Another potent force is dehumanisation. Liberals can not do without it. They can not treat people on an equivalent footing.

As impressive it may sound, there are more forces behind this very short comment. Stopping here.

The comment is non sense. The situation is no party has released the files. How it is said to work : The democrats did not release so there is nothing incriminating against Trump. For people able to treat people equivalently, it follows that Trump having not released the files, there is nothing incriminating against democrats (which goes against Trump's claim that alluded to Clinton being involved) It works both way, except for liberals who are slavers at heart, there are masters and slaves and a master owes nothing to the slaves.

It gets even funnier in another comment that reads that democrats hate so much Trump they would have taken a few losses on their side if there were something incriminating against Trump. Trump hate on democrats so by the same pattern of thought, it means there is nothing incriminating against democrats.

In other words, the Epstein files are empty. Which is the worst case scenario for liberals. It is even worse than the case both parties are incriminated by the files.Wanted to write a piece about that, no time so far.

Already made the point: the most plausible is that both parties are incriminated by the files and both of them would prefer the files not to be released. The main outcome is that the release of the files will paint a very bad name on liberals in front of the rest of the world. And liberal servants can not afford to be exposed this way in front of the rest of the world.

vbn

Anybody thinking the Demonrats would not use any evidence available to nail Trump as a pedophile is a monumrntsl idiot.

As pointed out before Trump booted Epstein out of Mar a Lago and helped the FBI get the first conviction.

What existed at the time when Trump's people took over were files prepared by corrupt Demonrats trying to run cover for the Demonrats.

Trump has called for all people with credible EVIDENCE to come forward.

Face facts, the Demonrats are the party of pedophiles and supporters of LGBT. They love the grooming and mutilation of children and their sterilization. They love porn in schools and drag queens as well.

They don't even know what a woman is!

Dear old Joe was accused by his own daughter of molesting her and is know as the Sniffer. Hunter Biden is a pedophile and crackhead as the Hunter Biden laptop proved.

Joan Rivers said Michelle Obama was a Tranny and died 2 weeks after she said this.

Hussein is in You Tube video calling Michelle Mike more than once.

Barrack Obama in his book Dreams of my Father's said he fantasized about being with a man.

Yes the Demonrats are pure filth. They love woman in men's sports. Pedophia is one of tbe reason they love Islam. Mohammed married a child of 6 and consummated the marriage when the child was 9.

The disgusting loon Blobbrain is very ignorant and very dumb but even this clown must know about some of the above.

By the way does anybody know a single Epstein trafficked girl who has accused Trump of pedophilia.

Virginia Guiffre, who was probably murdered, said she has no knowledge of Trump being involved with Epstein trafficked girls.

Alan Dershowitz who was Epstein's lawyer said if there was a list he would have known about it.

In time the truth will come out about all this. Perhaps just before the mid terms!

In the mean time disgusting buffoons like Blobbrain, who wholeheartedly supports the Democrat Pedophile Party, would do well to zip it. Bwahahahahahaha.

G8 and wa5ch the arogan video where recently Musk talked to Rogan about Trump saying that he knows Trump is not an evil man

It is very funny. Democrats do not like Muslims. It is another situation that makes no sense. It is the product of representation as forced by liberalism. A piece about that has been planned for a long time now but no time. The democratic party in the US is somewhat the party of the atheists. And they should be represented as well as Muslim faithful or even fanatics by the same party. It makes no sense. This forced association is an artefact of liberalism. It has no substance. There is no ideological background to it apart from liberalism's malfunction. Liberalism does not work as liberals claim it works.

As to paedophilia, both parties support it. Liberals liberalise and remember, peeps, liberals saw a lot of wrong in European societies that banned slavery. In Europe, before liberalism and the rise of white people, a free society was understood as a society that had no slaves. On the other hand liberals perceived the absence of slavery as an infringement on their god-given right to put people in slavery. Same is happening with paedophilia, liberals consider that a society that bans paedophilia is an unfree society. The democrats and republicans work hand in hand to make this situation progress and makes paedophilia the social norm. The situation is that neither the democratic party nor the republican party have released the Epstein files. To be accepted or denied.

-