In the past a situation developed where if you support the Democratic Party you support Democracy - if you oppose them you are supporting dictatorial Governance.
Lets look at how the issue and the architect of division in the USA and the real attackers on Democracy since since the attack on Democracy by the Democratic Party started 2015/16
2016 Election
In 2015 Clinton got support from the Obama White house - which included the FBI and CIA - to start an attack on Trump based on the Russian Collusion lies invented by the Democrats claiming collusion between Trump and Putin. In an attempt to get confirmation the Clinton Election campaign appointed Steele to do a report to proof collusion between Trump and Putin.
The report was total BS and the FBI offered Steele a million dollars to provide proof of collusion to them. In the end Steele could not prove anything. He claimed insiders in the Kremlin provided the info to him - but it was a lie. What actually happened was he was told what to include in the Steele Dossier, by the DNC and the Clinton election campaign, In the end the FBI leaked the dossier - which they knew was fake - to the media. There was other leakages of documentation to the New York Times on the issue by the FBI as well.
However, the FBI knew that the Steele Dossier was a fabrication but they used it in an application to the FIS Court for permission to spy on Page and through that on the Trump election campaign. When the matter was dealt with by the Inspector General of Justice the matter became clear - the FIS Court conemned the conduct of he FBI outright.
That is not where he matter ended. The Russians were surprised by the Trump victory and tried to find out what the foreign policy of the incoming Trump would entail. Amongst others the Russian Ambassador phoned the appointee by Trump as head of the CIA - the retired General Flynn (a registered Democrat) - in that regard. The FBI had a recording of the telephone call and then asked for an appointment telling him he would not be under oath and does not need legal representation at the meeting.
So the meeting went ahead and nothing could be found by the two FBI agents dew up a report on the meeting and then Strzok who hated Trump redid the report and sent his draft to work in the WH who worked in the WH and the WH legal team rewrote the report and it was filed, When Mueller was appointed as Special Council the false report on Flynn was sent to him and Mueller ordered that General Flynn be charged When General Flynn got the charge he refused to admit guilt and then the FBI threatened to charge his son with some fake crime if he did not admit guilt. In the end Barr found out what happened and withdraw the charge.\
Based on the Steele Dossier and other info the FBI and CIA provided to the media an Assistant Director in the Justice Department appointed Mueller as Special Council with the ultimate objective of fraaming charges against Trump. After more than two years Mueller founds nothi ng to incriminate Trump and all he came up with was a reference to financial help to fund this election campaign, which Trump accepted It turned out to be a lie as well - apparently somebody paid facebook $41 000 dollars for adverts supporting Trump in the election. Apparently believe like what they do regularly is to get the media and internet platforms to censor things detrimental to their party and Trump should have done the same. The second joke is that Mueller tied to help his masters by "not exonerating" Trump from being guilty of collusion with Putin in 2016. There is no provision for exonerating of anybody from being charged with criminal investigation if evidence is available to charge anybody - what Mueller tried to do was legally nonsense.
There were other issues that happened in and impacted on the 2016 election, The FBI has had proof of both and they did a protection racket to keep Clinton and her campaign manager Podesta out of jail. The first one was the usage of her private laptop to conduct Government business on and that contained a large number of classified documents. The FBI then politley asked Clinton to hand the computer to an agent that would visit her 3 days later to collect the computer. She destroyed the computer and the FBI did nothing to charge her with destruction of evidence they wanted. However, the FBI also had written proof that Clinton's campaign Manager had been involved in corruption involving Russia. Podesta registered a company in Boston to deal with global warming and green issues. The capital investment in the company was $32 million. However - a Russian company with links to the Krfemlin invested $178 million in the company. Podesta also received 75 000 shares as a present from a Russian Company. Podesta transferred the ownership of the shares to a company his daughter registered in Vermont in an obvious effort to hide the corrupt transaction. Easy to be corru[pt if the FBI protect you. Podesta has since be appointed by Biden to head the budget on Green Energy and one wnders how much of that money would vanish into thin air.
Podxesta on his part got worried about the anti-Russian campaigns in the media relating to the Russian Hoax and sent an e-mail wrote to Clinton about his worries, S he in response wrote to Podesta that she "has direct access to Putin's inner sanctum" The documentation as to the above was discussed on Fox News and the documentation shown publicly. His excuse was that the documents was stolen from his computer.- it was indeed hacked by a local because the idiotic Podesta used "password" as a secret code to enter his computer. The local sent the hacked documents to Assange. Whether the documents dealing with corruption was hacked from a computer or not does not mean the FBI should not investigate the corrupt activities of Podesta - but the cover-up was complete.
The 2020 election . .
The conduct of the FBI became questionable long before the 2020 election. In September 2019 Hunter Biden delivered his laptop to a computer repair workshop for repairs. Probably because he was drugged at the time he did not collect the laptop despite a number of reminders.
Under such circumstances the owner has the right to sell the laptop to cover his costs and the owner decided to check the laptop before sale and when eh checked the laptop he found a horrible collection of corrupt business deals, pornography and drug usage on the computer. In January 2020 the owner concerned took the Laptop to the FBI for further investigation of the criminal activities exposed on the laptop. The FBI took no action because it would expose Joe Biden as well.
Somehow the New York Post got a copy of the hard drive of the computer in October 2020 and contacted the FBI. That sent the CIA and FBI into panic and they tried a method developed by both institutions and the WH since 2021 and met with the media and internet platforms claiming that the laptop was Russian disinformation and should be censored and not reported on it. The CIA went further and issued a letter signed by 52 staff members and ex-staff members that the laptop was Russian Disinformation.
It was an obvious lie and the FBI went further and raided the homes of a number of associates of Trump to find copies of copies of the hard drive and another file that involve the five eyes investigation of Trump in 2020 declassified. They found nothing and no legal action followed the raids the FBI made.
For the next three years the FBI every time they were asked about the laptop in the House and Senate the response of the FBI was that the matter was under investigation - which was a lie as well - there were no investigations done. Since 2022 the DA of Delaware (Weiss) was investigating Hunter for tax evasion and illegal fire-arm ownership. The FBI then sent the laptop to Weiss for investigation - at least that is what they claimed they did.
When Weiss eventually charged Hunter Biden with tax evasion and illegal gun possession, the Huter Biden lawyers in collaboration with the WH and the Justice Department concocted a plea deal which the following conditions -
* that in view of the drug addiction of Hunter at the time he committed the offenses he should not get a jail sentence for the crimes committed;
* that investigations iro Hunter Biden's offenses of the past should not be further investigated; and
* that no investigation of potential future crimes of Hunter would be undertaken.
The Judge asked whether anything like that admission ever happened in the USA in the past The judge realized that the guilty plea was legal garbage ad threw out the guilty plea. It transpired that it was legal garbage and rejected the plea,
The guilty plea case was public knowledge and a storm erupted in both the Senate and House and the result was that Weiss was appointed as Special Counil. It was not clear whether the laptop investigation was in the scope of the Weiss to investigate I would be amazed if it is. The crimes of the Biden's must be covered .up totally.
In 2023 the scandalous conduct of the Justice Department and the FBI reached new heights when the following issues came to the fore,
The fact is the Democrats have rules for themselves and oppressive rules for themselves and others for the opposing Republicans. In 2019 Trump find out that major foreign aid grant corruption kickbacks to politicians and bureau are always attached to grants so he froze all grants until the procedures to cut out the kick-back sickness.
Part of the problem that bothers Trump was a video recoding from 2018 in which Biden bragged how he had the Ukraine Prosecutor fired when the started an investigation of Burisma. Despite rhe fact that the Germans and Nuland praised the man for the excellent work he did insofar a rooting out endemnic corruption in Ukraine is concerned . The fact was that that he had Hunter Biden was on the Bursma despite he fact he had to zero of the oil and gas exploration. The real reason for the discharge was that any investigation of Burisma would inevitably expose Biden corruption in Ukraine.. i
Conduct of the Justice Department and the FBI after 2021
The White Domestic Terrorism issue .
Biden started off accusing opponents of being white Domestic terrorists a number of times in public statements. That accusation is often used to support allegations of Whites opposed to the Biden Regime of being racists. .
. .