The battle over national sovereignty and the Wall

The Globalists are hell bent on trying to destroy national sovereignty of the European nation states and the USA as a vital step towards their one world government tyranny. However they are not having it all their way these days. Trump is president and there is a massive uprising against the Globalists ruling Europe which threatens to sweep them away in May 2019. People do not want their countries being over run and their values, traditions and culture destroyed. Nor do they want the enormous economic burden, massive crime and loss of life, rapes etc.

Open borders is a key agenda item to destroy these nations. There is nothing, absolutely nothing about open borders that benefits a country.

So Beeno predicts Trump will build that wall somehow as it is the will of the American people and so clearly in their interests. Send all the invaders to nz i say!

Now watch this clip where Judge Pirro and others discuss this crucial issue:

Battle over the WALL

Extracts of a discussion on very fake news CNN where Mller completely destroys that globali st shill Wolf Blitzer. The jackass tries to argue in favour of no Wall by because of the cost of the wall!!!!!! How stupid can you get. Then suggests that the demonrats favour border security. Miller shreds the mampara. Hahahahahahahahaha All Wolf can do vs ask to change the subject.

MILLER: Thank you for asking the question. So first of all, as the president has said, as we've all said, the wall would be paid for through the savings on trade alone. But I want to explain to you..


MILLER: I'm glad you're giving me the chance to answer the question. Because as you know, Wolf, in Washington budgeting, an offset is different than an allocation. Even though the trade savings offset the costs, Congress still has to allocate the funding. Even though it's paid for by trade savings, Congress has to allocate the money. But it's also fully paid for in another very important way, which is the cost of illegal immigration. Everyone talks of the cost of the wall., the cost of the wall is pennies compared to the cost of illegal immigration. 

You obviously can't measure the cost of the lives lost to illegal immigration. On both sides of the border and all the horrible things done by vicious and sinister cartels and coyotes. But at the same time, the cost of drugs alone according to our council on economic advisers, heroin over $230 billion a year, over 90 percent of it comes from the border. Public benefits for illegal immigrants, over $100 billion a year.

MILLER: No, here's what's really significant, I the literally hundreds of billions of dollars that will be saved for the American people by reducing illegal immigration. Wolf, as you know, illegal immigration -- illegal immigrants on average are lower skilled workers who consume more in public benefits than they pay in taxes. As a result of that, it costs our country hundreds of billions of dollars.

BLITZER: Stephen...

MILLER: This is a matter of social and economic justice for the American team to have a secure border, to have a wall, a physical impediment to illegal entry, and have a system that's humane and just. What we are right now is fundamentally unjust and inhumane, and we have to change that.

BLITZER: The Democrats -- Stephen, the democrats support border security. They don't support $5 billion for a wall.

MILLER: Could you identify, wolf, for me some of the border security they support?

BLITZER: They all support border security.

MILLER: Like what? They voted against case law. They voted against ending sanctuary cities. They voted against supporting MS-13 gang members, they voted against supporting violent criminals. They voted time and time against a physical border wall to stop illegal entry. I mean, where is the evidence that you keep asserting they're for border security? They haven't been. They oppose closing loopholes for asylum.

BLITZER: Stephen, I want to move on to another issue. Stephen.