TRANSGENDER CANDIDATE Wins Vermont Democratic Nomination for Governor

All the proof you need that the supporters of the "progressive" demonrats are a bunch of very perverted pervs! No question about it.

Vermont nominated its first transgender candidate, Christine Hallquist for governorship from a major party on Tuesday evening.

Christine Hallquist is the former CEO of the Vermont Electric Cooperative and she’s running on an ultra progressive Socialist message promising a bunch of free stuff.

FOX News reported:

Christine Hallquist made history in Vermont Tuesday night as the first openly transgender nominee for a governorship from a major party in the nation’s history, beating back her Democratic challengers in the state’s primary.

Hallquist defeated educator Brenda Siegel, who earlier was considered a frontrunner in the race, and environmentalist James Ehlers.

On the Republican side, first-term Gov. Phil Scott beat back a challenge from businessman Keith Stern to win the GOP gubernatorial primary, surviving the major political fallout from his decision to sign the state’s first major gun control laws earlier this year.

She’s appealed to Vermonters with a progressive message including a livable wage, Medicare for all, free public college education and high-speed broadband access — even to those who live on remote back roads.

“That’s how I want to be known in Vermont,” Hallquist, 62, told The Associated Press in an interview at her Burlington offices. “Nationally, I want to be known as the first trans candidate.”

Hallquist also defeated another candidate who was trying to make history: a 14-year-old boy, Ethan Sonneborn, who took advantage of the state constitution’s lack of an age requirement to seek the governorship.

Republican (RINO) Phil Scott is the current Governor of Vermont and since no sitting Governor has been unseated in over 5 decades, it appears Christine Hallquist’s chance of winning are fairly slim.

This cannot be correct. Transgender? Nobody has ever crossed genders. Ever. This fallacy must end. At the very least call a spade a spade: A dude who lost his nik-naks. 

Augen the insanity of these globalist leftie s knows no limits!

I know, I'm having discussion right now with a couple of them. We should supposedly "leave people" alone, as they attack Folau for having an opinion. When I point out how draconian they are in policing the very thoughts of everyone they come into contact with, they try and shift position instead of dealing with the points I raised. Now I have been presented with a list of Republican child abusers, as if that has any relevance to my position (Republicans and Liberals are two sides to the same coin). It's called the right hand path and the left hand path in occultism. You are given two options representing duality and the shifting of forces. So them telling me about child abusing Republicans was supposed to be their "aha got ya" moment. It only serves my point even further. Humanism is, in essence, evil. They'd naturally attempt to attack my faith, but on what moral grounds? Their Liberal position is an ancient pagan one of relativism. "Do what thou wilt". So adopting a position on morality, and criticising someone for their faith, is an enormous contradiction at the very heart of the philosophy and religion given to them. They are swatting at thin air because I do not support paedophilia. They still won't acknowledge that Liberals are pushing paedophilia. It's been rebranded as paedosexualism. MSM even promoted the act of having a little girl touch a naked man at an art exhibition. That pales to the sexualization of children in the Liberal entertainment industry. Showing me a list of Republicans merely shows me what I already know: the ruling class are depraved. Paedophilia isn't even the speck on the tip of the iceberg though. 

 You can't fix stupid. There's no pill for it.

You can't fix stupid - Ron White

Ron White...what a legend!! 

As for the transgender thing, and this probably won't go down well with the rest that have posted here so far, but I understand there to be two genders. Male and female. There are some biological anomalies, where babies are born with both sets of genitals, which would obviously be confusing for the child, but they must ultimately choose one or the other. But when you are plainly, from a biological point of view, either male or female, and then choose to change it...that is when it stops making sense to me. If you are attracted to the "wrong" sex, then you are gay, okay fine, but becoming something you are not...nope.... I'm lost on that.  

Augen, lets not regurgitate our discussion on the Folau thread. I just wanted to add my two cents to this discussion.