FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  USA Natioanal Border control support Trump in hard hitting statement roasting obummer!

USA Natioanal Border control support Trump in hard hitting statement roasting obummer!

Started by Beeno110 REPLIES389 VIEWS· 30 Mar 2016, 16:33
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
30 Mar 2016, 16:33
#1
30 Mar 2016, 16:33#1
Great to hear ordinary for speaking out against the half backed twits seeking to ruin America!! WHAT A FANTATASTIC ENDORSMENT. BRILLANT STUFF!!!!

National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) endorsed Donald Trump for President of the United States. The unusually bold statement comes just days after a senior policy adviser for Trump made clear that future U.S. border security policy would be largely determined by the men and women of the U.S. Border Patrol who are actual agents protecting the border and not by politically-appointed bureaucrats in the Border Patrol or its parent agency, Customs and Border Protection (CBP), if Trump is elected.

The endorsement is the first-ever in a presidential primary for the NBPC. The agents’ statement makes clear that Trump’s public pledge to secure the border by turning to the actual agents in the NBPC is revolutionary and an opportunity never-before-seen and one that may never be seen again. They wrote, “Mr. Trump will take on special interest and embrace the ideas of rank-and-file Border Patrol agents rather than listening to the management yes-men who say whatever they are programmed to say.(YOU KNOW OAKS LIKE MY FRIEND ROOITWIT WHO ARE POLITICALY CORRECT YES MEN! ) This is a refreshing change that we have not seen before – and may never see again.”

The NBPC has been the only voice for nearly 17,000 Border Patrol agents. The organization has served as the only advocacy and defense mechanism for the needs and interests of agents against overwhelming attacks from political groups and special interests opposing a secured border. (Like the hapless hillary clink who only reason for having open borders is that she thinks a majority of them will vote for her and to hang with the consequences for Americans of all colours and hues)

The full statement from the NBPC:

March 30, 2016

The National Border Patrol Council is the official organization representing our nation’s Border Patrol Agents. We represent 16,500 agents who selflessly serve this country in an environment where our own political leaders try to keep us from doing our jobs.
 
The NBPC has had a longstanding practice of not endorsing presidential candidates in the primaries. We will not, however, shy away from voicing our opinions as it pertains to border security and the men and women of the United States Border Patrol. As such, we are breaking with our past practice and giving our first-ever endorsement in a presidential primary. We think it is that important: if we do not secure our borders, American communities will continue to suffer at the hands of gangs, cartels and violent criminals preying on the innocent. (Thepolitically correctmamparas roasted trump for speking about this!!) The lives and security of the American people are at stake, and the National Border Patrol Council will not sit on the sidelines.
 

As an organization we expect our elected officials to aggressively pursue the interests of the country. America has already tried a young, articulate freshman senator who never created a job as an attorney and under whose watch criminal cartels have been given the freest border reign ever known.

Unlike his opponents, Donald Trump is not a career politician, he is an outsider who has created thousands of jobs, pledged to bring about aggressive pro-American change, and who is completely independent of special interests. We don’t need a person who has the perfect Washington-approved tone, and certainly NOT another establishment politician in the W.H.  Indeed, the fact that people are more upset about Mr. Trump’s tone than about the destruction wrought by open borders tells us everything we need to know about the corruption in Washington.
 
We need a person in the White House who doesn’t fear the media, who doesn’t embrace political correctness, who doesn’t need the money, who is familiar with success, who won’t bow to foreign dictators, who is pro-military and values law enforcement, and who is angry for America and NOT subservient to the interests of other nations. Donald Trump is such a man.
 
Mr. Trump is as bold and outspoken as other world leaders who put their country’s interests ahead of all else.  Americans deserve to benefit for once instead of always paying and apologizing. Our current political establishment has bled this country dry, sees their power evaporating, and isn’t listening to voters who do all the heavy lifting.  Trump is opposed by the established powers specifically because they know he is the only candidate who actually threatens the established powers that have betrayed this country.
 

You can judge a man by his opponents: all the people responsible for the problems plaguing America today are opposing Mr. Trump. It is those without political power – the workers, the law enforcement officers, the everyday families and community members – who are supporting Mr. Trump.
 
Mr. Trump will take on special interests and embrace the ideas of rank-and-file Border Patrol agents rather than listening to the management yes-men who say whatever they are programmed to say. This is a refreshing change that we have not seen before – and may never see again.
 
Mr. Trump is correct when he says immigration wouldn’t be at the forefront of this presidential campaign if months ago he hadn’t made some bold and necessary statements. And when the withering media storm ensued he did not back down one iota.  That tells you the measure of a man.  (IT TAKES A MAN TO RECOGNISE A MAN!!) When the so-called experts said he was too brash and outspoken, and that he would fade away, they were proven wrong. We are confident they will be proven wrong again in November when he becomes President of the United States.
 
There is no greater physical or economic threat to Americans today than our open border.  And there is no greater political threat than the control of Washington by special interests.  In view of these threats, the National Border Patrol Council endorses Donald J. Trump for President – and asks the American people to support Mr. Trump in his mission to finally secure the border of the United States of America, before it is too late.

Sincerely,

Brandon Judd
President
National Border Patrol Council

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Mar 2016, 16:48
#2
30 Mar 2016, 16:48#2
 So what - how many voters are there represented in the Council?  Texas did not vote for Trump and that is the state with one of the longer borders - so what again?  
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
30 Mar 2016, 17:55
#3
30 Mar 2016, 17:55#3
Right on "queue" (sic).
LMAO!
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
31 Mar 2016, 05:59
#4
31 Mar 2016, 05:59#4
 I bet you can hardly 'fathom' it......LMAO !
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
31 Mar 2016, 06:08
#5
31 Mar 2016, 06:08#5
This is a significant endorsement because many decent people still put great stock in the police and their sister agencies. 
But you better brace yourself HasBeen, Trump is having perhaps his worst week yet. The campaign manager farce, the statements about punishing women for abortions, subsequently reversed are creating a negative vibe. This coincides with the Wisconsin primaries where Trump is struggling....and with new national polling which suggests Cruz has closed to within 2 points.

This will last for a while until the campaign trail reaches NY. I can't see much support for Cruz in that state.
Still any mistake in the next 10 days is going to reverberate....it's looking more and more like a brokered convention, with Trump holding a majority of delegates, but not enough to secure the nomination.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
31 Mar 2016, 13:15
#6
31 Mar 2016, 13:15#6
 No worries Dr Moz, the media have predicted his demise from day one. Trump is being proved correct again and again. And I think he will be just fine.
Trouble is you guys read the globalist owned media and suck it all up. Now these bought media types get a shock every time Trump wins. They just don't get it that a massive revolt against the elite is taking place. Trump just keeps nailing the issues.
Wee bernie is also cashing in on the dems side as an anti establishment. If he loses to hillary clink( assuming she somehow doesn't go to jail) his followers will cross over to Trump in significant numbers.The last poll number I saw gave cruzie a small lead in Wisconsin but Trump to win in, I think it was, 5 other states in the April GOP elections?Immigration, security, health, standard of living etc etc. He ahs had the guts to speak out and his support keeps growing.Trump for POTUS!!!!!!!!!!!
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
31 Mar 2016, 13:28
#7
31 Mar 2016, 13:28#7
 The plan of the globalists. You ,may wonder why the EU are commiting suicide. Its based on this view:

In October of 2015, Frans Timmermans, Vice President of the European Commission, gave a speech that was largely withheld in English-speaking media, but now discovered, declaring that no country on the planet would be allowed to remain homogeneous – that we will all be forced to accept "diversity" which is part of the Cultural-Marxist agenda. Excepts:

Diversity is now in some parts of Europe seen as a threat. Diversity comes with challenges. But diversity is humanity’s destiny. There is not going to be, even in the remotest places of this planet, a nation that will not see diversity in its future. That’s where humanity is heading. And those politicians trying to sell to their electorates a society that is exclusively composed of people from one culture, are trying to portray a future based on a past that never existed, therefore that future will never be.

Europe will be diverse, like all other parts of the world will be diverse. The only question is, how do we deal with that diversity? And my answer to that is, by ensuring that our values determine how we deal with diversity and not giving up our values to refuse diversity. That will bring us down as a society. (THIS FOOL NEEDS TO GO AND LIVE UNDER SHARIA LAW. AS IF THE MUSLIMS FOR ONE CARE A HOOT ABOUT HIS VALUES!!)

If we don’t get this right, I truly believe Europe will not remain the Europe we built. Europe will not remain a place of peace and freedom, for very long.(CAN ANYTHING BE MORE PROFOUNDLY STUPID!!)

From: http://europa(dot)eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-15-5754_en.htm
"Europe will be diverse, or war! - Frank Timmermans"https://youtu.be/q94syUDDhxA

A nation is a People with a common blood, culture, and history. The concept of "Diversity" is polar-opposite of Natural Law; it results in chaos, crime, terrorism, societal distrust and White genetic Genocide. It is devoid of any virtue and based on the communist agenda that is completely at odds with the natural order. This is why the EU must die.

Please spread to expose this, and help preserve a future for your People and children.

I find is astonishing that these morons think their values will survive the Islamic invasion of Europe! 

The battle between the nationalists and multi culturalist globalists has been joined. Hence how vital Brexit and Trump are. 



BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
31 Mar 2016, 13:33
#8
31 Mar 2016, 13:33#8
 While its quite obvious the GOP elites would prefer hillary to win given they are in reality on the same side, only Trump can beat the democrats. Curz has no chance whatsoever.

The only question for Republicans is: Which candidate can win states that Mitt Romney lost?

Start with the fact that, before any vote is cast on Election Day, the Democrats have already won between 90 and 98 percent of the black vote and 60 to 75 percent of the Hispanic and Asian vote. Unless Republicans run the table on the white vote, they lose.

If there’s still hope, it lies with Trump and only Trump. Donald Trump will do better with black and Hispanic voters than any other Republican. But it’s with white voters that he really opens up the electoral map.

A Republican Party that wasn’t intent on committing suicide would know that. But Stuart Stevens, the guy who lost a winnable presidential election in 2012, says it’s impossible for Republicans to get one more white vote — and the media are trying to convince the GOP that he’s right.

Stevens says Romney tapped out every last white voter and still lost, so he says Republicans are looking for “the Lost Tribes of the Amazon” hoping to win more white votes: “In 1980, Ronald Reagan won 56 percent of white voters and won a landslide victory of 44 states. In 2012, Mitt Romney won 59 percent of whites and lost with 24 states.”

Apparently, no one’s told Stevens about the 50-state Electoral College. The national white vote is irrelevant. Presidential elections are won by winning states. (Only someone who got his ass kicked running an eminently electable candidate might not know this.)

Excluding third parties and breaking it down to a two-man race, Mitt Romney won 88 percent of the white vote in Mississippi, but only 40 percent of the white vote in Massachusetts. What sense does it make to talk about his national percentage of the white vote with disparities like that?

Romney lost the white vote to Obama in five crucial swing states: Maine (42 percent of the white vote), Minnesota (47 percent), New Hampshire (48 percent), Iowa (48 percent) and Wisconsin (49 percent). He only narrowly beat Obama’s white vote in other important swing states — Illinois (51 percent), Colorado (52 percent), Michigan (53 percent), Ohio (54 percent) and Pennsylvania (54 percent).

Increasing the white vote in these states gives Trump any number of paths to victory.

If Trump wins only the same states as Romney, but adds Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Illinois — where Romney’s white vote was below his national average — Trump wins with 280 electoral votes. (Romney wasn’t an ideal candidate in the industrial Midwest.)

Trump could lose any one of those states and make up for it by winning Minnesota and Wisconsin — where Romney actually lost the white vote. Or he could lose two of those states but add victories in places outside the Rust Belt, where Romney’s white vote was also below average, such as Colorado, Iowa, Maine and New Hampshire. (In 1992, Ross Perot came in second in Maine, beating George Bush.)

I haven’t even mentioned Florida, where Trump recently trounced Stuart Stevens’ dream candidate, 

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)79%, a sitting senator — and a Cuban! — in a 20-point rout. Republican primary voters outnumbered Democratic primary voters in that election by more than half a million votes.

If Trump wins Florida, he needs to win only two or three of the 10 states where Romney either lost the white vote outright or won a smaller percentage of it than he did nationally.

Stevens’ analysis assumes that there will be no new voters — and, again, there isn’t a mammal on the North American landmass who knows less about winning presidential elections than Stuart Stevens.

It’s as if we’re only allowed to divvy up the pile of voters from 2012. Unless you voted in 2012, you can’t vote in 2016! Use it or lose it, buddy.

That’s not how it works.

Trump is saying he’ll bring in lots of new people, as he has throughout the primaries. In the Florida GOP primary, for example, Trump got nearly half a million more votes than Romney did in 2012 — and about half a million new people voted. Trump may be wrong, but it’s insane to say that it’s impossible for him to bring out new voters.

What’s impossible is for any Republican candidate, other than Trump, to win a single state Romney lost. 

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)97%’s corny speaking style is creepy to anyone who doesn’t already agree with everything he says. He’s the less likable, more hard-edged version of Romney. Every other Republican is, one way or another, a less attractive version of Romney.

Maybe 50 years of Third World immigration means it’s too late, and even Trump can’t win. But it’s an absolute certainty that any other Republican will lose.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
31 Mar 2016, 13:41
#9
31 Mar 2016, 13:41#9
Beeno
I read all the media reports - not only the Liberal establishment reports.  I see a rebellion brewing in the US public against the interests of the monopolists, but to imply that Trump and Sanders are the only embodiment of that sentiment is not true.  Cruz rebelled against them long before Trump even entered the campaign.   
Trump is increasingly messing up his own case as well.  He was leading by far in Wisconsin and his lead slipped to virtually nothing.  By next week he will not win in that state.
Mozart is making out that New York and other states will be for Trump - but I think they may slip out of his grasp as well.   Trump made a massive mistake by attacking Cruz's family - his only hope being that he and Cruz should have united against the Establishment candidates - thus ensuring they win at the Convention.   That is gone now and Trump will not end up as the RP candidate.              
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
31 Mar 2016, 13:41
#10
31 Mar 2016, 13:41#10
Beeno
I read all the media reports - not only the Liberal establishment reports.  I see a rebellion brewing in the US public against the interests of the monopolists, but to imply that Trump and Sanders are the only embodiment of that sentiment is not true.  Cruz rebelled against them long before Trump even entered the campaign.   
Trump is increasingly messing up his own case as well.  He was leading by far in Wisconsin and his lead slipped to virtually nothing.  By next week he will not win in that state.
Mozart is making out that New York and other states will be for Trump - but I think they may slip out of his grasp as well.   Trump made a massive mistake by attacking Cruz's family - his only hope being that he and Cruz should have united against the Establishment candidates - thus ensuring they win at the Convention.   That is gone now and Trump will not end up as the RP candidate.              
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
31 Mar 2016, 20:36
#11
31 Mar 2016, 20:36#11
 If you had indeed read the reports you would realise that cruz supported various anti american trade treaties and also was weak on immigration. I ppsted info on this
Trump has made a stand on these issues from day one of his campaign.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes