FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Who killed Seth Rich and why?

Who killed Seth Rich and why?

Started by clevermike5 REPLIES877 VIEWS· 25 Mar 2019, 14:40
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
25 Mar 2019, 14:40
#1
25 Mar 2019, 14:40#1

The following from Off Guardian:-


Last month Seth Rich, a data analyst who worked for the DNC, was shot near his home in Washington DC. He was on the phone to his girlfriend when it happened. Police were called to the scene and discovered the young man’s body at roughly 4.20am. It was reported that Rich was “covered in bruises”, shot “several times” and “at least once in the back”.

The New York Daily News reported:

…police have found little information to explain his death. At this time, there are no suspects, no motive and no witnesses in Rich’s murder.

While initial theories were that the killing was robbery or mugging gone wrong, the Washington Post said:

There is no immediate indication that robbery was a motive in the attack…but it has not been ruled out as a possibility.”

Rich’s family have also reported that nothing was taken:

[Rich’s] hands were bruised, his knees are bruised, his face is bruised, and yet he had two shots to his back, and yet they never took anything.”

On August 9th Julian Assange gave an interview on Dutch television in which he seemed to imply that Rich’s death was politically motivated, and perhaps suggest he had been a source for the DNC e-mail leak:

That same day wikileaks tweeted that they were offering a $20,000 dollar reward for information on the killing of Mr Rich.

These are the facts of the case, so far. And they are undisputed.

I’m not going to take a position on the motive for Mr Rich’s killing, or possible suspects. But I do want to point out the general level of media silence. Take these facts and change the names – imagine Trump’s email had been hacked, and then a staffer with possible ties to wikileaks was inexplicably shot dead. Imagine this poor young man had been a Kremlin whistleblower, or a Chinese hacker, or an Iranian blogger.

If this, as yet unsolved, murder had ties to anyone other than Hillary Clinton, would it be being so ritually and rigourously ignored by the MSM"

So a few wise guys made the following  comments:-

*    Seth was bruised, and shot twice in the back; there was no robbery. Former Clinton partner James MacDougall was separated from his heart medication by prison guards; he died in solitary confinement.

*    Everyone already KNOWS who killed him (was revealed in Wikileaks 2nd email drop, where John Podesta’s emails states ‘I wished I knew who stole my emails because I’d make an example of them” Podesta was leading the support organisation in the 2016 election,

*     Seth Rich died of natural causes or as one might says causes quite natural. Phook with the Clinton’s in any way– naturally you’re going to died suddenly and violently

*     ask the clintons, a lot of people who they disliked for one reason or another have commited suicide by shooting themselves multiple times in the back of the head

So  why don’t I trust politicians?    Because they are bloody dangerous!!!!!!!!!!

  


CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
26 Mar 2019, 11:17
#2
26 Mar 2019, 11:17#2
The Podesta emails do not reveal who killed Seth Rich. It only reveal that Podesta could probably have an idea . My own hunch is that he either knows exactly or was behind it. If the emails contained anything that can link Podesta to the emails the Republicans would have been onto it in a flash.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
26 Mar 2019, 13:10
#3
26 Mar 2019, 13:10#3

A detective investigating Seth's murder could not get hold of Seth's laptop. The family that originally hired him asked him to stop investigating the matter.

Seth Rich was a Bernie supporter. It is believed he was furious when it came to light how Crooked Hillary and the DNC shafted Bernie. He handled the DNC servers and he downloaded the emails onto a flash drive and got it to Assange. Assange insists it was not a state party who gave him the emails. I believe Assange who has a perfect record in only providing correct information. 

These facts also indicate is was unlikely Russia was involved in providing Assange with the emails. 

The Metadata proves from the speed of the download that the internet could not have been used. It Had to be an inside job as the download speed indicates that a flash drive was used. 

Next - the DNC refused to allow the FBI to examine the sever!!! 

Instead a Clinton aligned and paid for firm, Crowdstrike provided a mirror of what they claimed was a true image of the hard drive. So it becomes a matter of accepting their word whilst knowing Crooked Hillary and the criminal DNC wanted to pin the hack on Russia. 

The FBI, CIA etc controlled by Hussein Obozos corrupt henchmen accepted and promoted the myth and then if course tried to say Trump colluded with Russia. 

One wonders if Assange will trade the his information as to who have him the emails for a presidential pardon or could Trump already know. 

There going to be much more coming to light that will be devastating to the demonrats. 

The muslin traitor John Brennan, Hussein CIA director, has been slamming Trump repeatedly and as recently as two weeks was on fake news TV accusing  Trump of Treason! 

Now the traitor is running scared and now says he is relieved Trump is not a traitor. Fake news MSM are trying to cover their part in the COUP attempt. 

Heads are going to roll. 


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Mar 2019, 13:31
#4
26 Mar 2019, 13:31#4

This is weird.   How can a family ask a detective they hired to stop the investigation?   Wer they threatened or what?   Were they paid off by anybody?

Fact is that any murder should be investigated and not hushed up by anybody>  It I clear that the District of Columbia police department is pretending it was a  suicide and the FBI is not going to take up the matter either, 

Could it cause too many problems to some politico's if the matter is investigated fully?   .       

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Mar 2019, 13:31
#5
26 Mar 2019, 13:31#5

This is weird.   How can a family ask a detective they hired to stop the investigation?   Wer they threatened or what?   Were they paid off by anybody?

Fact is that any murder should be investigated and not hushed up by anybody>  It I clear that the District of Columbia police department is pretending it was a  suicide and the FBI is not going to take up the matter either, 

Could it cause too many problems to some politico's if the matter is investigated fully?   .   

Anyway - how could this happen in the USA?   I thought it was what happened in KZN - where murder of ANC members are frequent?    

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
26 Mar 2019, 13:31
#6
26 Mar 2019, 13:31#6

Beeno, that detective was exposed and backtracked on most of his story. There is also some confusion as to who appointed him. 


— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes