Best decision Rassie made this year

Agreed. Snyman was another. 

Mozart made valid points 2 and 3  and AO came back with a bugger-up.  Point 1 could be true - but for a weakened lock combination in most tests and a poor selection of two of the three loosies - his decision to play Du Toit as a loosie was spot-on - the other three loosies used was way off the radar.   

Was Snyman better than Etzebeth and even than Du Toit starting in one test at 4?   No way - even when Etzebeth was lukewarm in most tests he played in.   Although never used - Schickerling was better in SR matches than Snyman and so was the rarely used De Jager.   Another brain fart - AO?  

I made a detailed study about Snyman's performances.  His first test was magnificient - but for the rest of his performances th situation was as follows:-

*   Snyman started in 5 tests and was on the bench in 6 tests;

*   He was magnificient in his first test - followed by 3 of the other 10 performances were average and the rest sub-standard.

Careful - I made a detailed study and you are free to tell us I am wrong - but you better have facts - not fiction to counter my assessment.     

You have no such information. Where was Steph against Wales? He is our primary ball carrying forward. Got beaten back. Did you see that coming? We'd be better off utilising Snyman, who has had two poor game this year. 2 and no more. 

Ha-ha-ha - gave me the games he was not substandard in - there was 3 in total.   Take this madness from you Snyman played for 10 minutes and was so poor he was replaced under the pretext of an injury.

Why refer to Du Toit and not to Mostert who was Snyman's lock partner and his ball carries.   pathetic argument.

I have all the information as to Snyman's performances in all games - even the times he played when coming from the bench - so you better came \with facts and not BS as is your normal player evaluations.  

I would indeed be surprised if Snyman being back into the picture in the squads next year.     

Mostert wasn't being knocked back, fumbling the ball, conceding penalties, missing tackles, being cleanly beaten and ruining mauls. 

All this, yet Snyman was the "real problem". He and Mostert. Our locks weren't our problem against Wales. Our loose forwards and backline. Eben and Mostert were solid. Snyman had 3 possessions, a pass and two runs. How then can we determine he was such a liability when he barely featured? Utterly ridiculous. Though entirely predictable. Dance on hot coals; avoid the real issues. 

Take this madness from you Snyman played for 10 minutes and was so poor he was replaced under the pretext of an injury.

And you want people to take you seriously? You can see him struggling to move during the Francis try to the point where he can't get to the ball carrier to make a tackle. Unless your theory is that he deliberately let Wales score in order to pull off a fake injury.

One step forward, and face plant. Congratulations. You promise these exposés, but come up with nothing. Show me where Mostert was knocked back. ESPN doesn't have the answer. All we have here is a very loose narrative weaved from numbers you can't interpret. You make the same mistake time and tike again. 

How the hell can a player carry balls 9 times an made zero meters gained - without he being knocked back in at least half the carries.

However,  the discussion was not about Du Toit at all - it was about your standard BS story about Snyman and a diversion was created as to Du Toit - the normal thing is for you to write BS on site and when caught out to try and escape by using further BS.

Time to change your username again - you have been found out too many times already.