2015, Australia. Burger 20/1. Too bad, such an heroic effort couldn't compensate for the Highwayman.
The following week against New Zealand, again 13/1. This was in the abbreviated RC. Brussow had 14/1, just out of interest.
Samoa: Burger 9/1, Louw 8/0. It was a low tackling game for the Boks as Samoa only had 39% possession. Victor was 8/0 and stopped a breakout try after a poor Willie chip earlier in the first half when they were threatening more. So, three of our maligned players were doing the bulk of the defending, a considerable amount of tackles considering how few attacks Samoa carried out.
Scotland: Another WC fixture. Burger 14/3, Louw 10/0.
So the WC is the norm - playing 4 games against weak teams set the norm. Use the RC since 2012 if you want to prove anything. I looked at Louw in the RC this year and that was enough.
One has to be careful to write anything on site - since the deceivers will always try to distort it to prove some disconnected point. Biggest liar ever was Mozart - proven a thousand times over. Ask Rooinek as well, he can give a long list of constant l;ies y Mozart.
You have never lied - coming from the biggest liar I have come across that is rich.
You started fraudulent threads and is a proven mathematical abuser - just look at the stunts you tried to get at the present Springboks compared to the 2014 player performances.
You make lying claims about players and when caught out you suddenly say it is your opinion. That is not good enough.
Aside from that you constantly brag on site about meeting with people and your constant attacks on others are always based on disinformation. Your HR is shot and I wonder how you manage ever to get and hold onto jobs with the vicious characteristics you display.
Lastly - you are prejudiced against a long list of rugby players and the lies you "discover" about them has been exposed time and again.
I have tried recently not to attack you and others personally on site - and all I get in return is vicious continuous attacks. Sorry - I respected you a lot initially - but you have turned into a vicious and rabid mongrel.
Mozart
Just a string of lies about me personally is enough to fill 20 books.
I can start about the weekly reports on injuries to Goosen you posted when he was still playing for the Cheetahs is enough - especially since he was never injured when you claimed he was. I can go on about the lies you wrote week after week about Du Toit - the story about a long neck, thin shoulders and thin wrists are so far removed from fact that is unbelievable.
Then there was the recent claims that you, AO and Pakie are such good analysts that you see some things nobody else see or commented on - normally so distorted that it must be lies.
Mozart
Looking at what photographs? Was it a photo of Mafield with the head of Du Tooit interposed on it?
You are talking Kak as per normal. Looking at the Bok photos and seeing the measurement between the level of the chin and the top of the jersey it is clear that Etzebeth has longer neck than Du Toit and the fact is there is no photographic evidence which proofs that you are not lying about Du Toit.
By the way what about "process tackles"? Why do the players your dislike make "process tackles" and the duds you support make "tackles". There is not a player in the game of rugby who consistently make strong tackles even you may think so.
Listen - if you do not realize that you are spreading shit you will never know.
Listen - if you do not realize that you are spreading shit you will never know.
Is this how ridiculous the discussions are going to be? Mike. Seriously? The length of Steph's neck? I bet if Moz said he had two feet you'd find a contrary interpretation.
No - I do not like maligning anybody based on make-believe BS made up by anybody with psychologically sick intentions.
Psychologically sick intentions? I think you are taking this way too far.
Nutcase - your interpretation is as per normal BS. Looking at the shoulders the tallest guy is DE Jager - with Etzebeth shoulder height is very little above De Toit's - but he is taller than Du Toit. The longer neck is there for anyone to see, Your interpretation of the height of the shoulders of Vermeulen is also out if the photo is taken into account. Du Toit is at ;east 2 inches taller at the start of the neck.
Anybody the neck length is total BS - an interpretation only you thrive in. What is worse is the thin shoulders and thin wrists BS.
Listen Mozart you lied about it based on a photo you misrepresented. totally.
Furhter - your constant demigrating of Du Toit is what one can only describe as sickness of your mind.
.
Listen at least in one case above you are talking utter shit as per normal. The Koch incident was normal and done 50 times per game in matches. Du Touit was supporting his run and the idiocy to blame him for the penalty is your standard BS,
You are mad to base things entirely on one photo and then misinterpreted the whole scenario totally.
How childish can you become.