Otherwise ...........

cvb

"This photo looks digitally altered rather than real. A few signs suggest manipulation:

1. The proportions between the interviewer and the golfer are extreme. While height differences do happen, the golfer appears unusually tall compared to the interviewer, with her head and torso stretched in a way that doesn’t look natural.
2. Her legs in particular seem elongated compared to her upper body, which is a common artifact when images are warped.
3. The shadows and lighting don’t show inconsistencies, which means the edit was done carefully, but the exaggerated height is the giveaway.
4. The watermark “Kid Jive” suggests it might be from a humor or meme page, which often exaggerates features for comedic effect.

So no, this is not a genuine, unedited photo—it’s been manipulated to make the golfer look much taller than normal.

Do you want me to show you what a corrected, more realistic version of this photo might look like?"

But you knew that ne... :-)

Thanks for the lighter side posting.