Viv Richards
Who is the best cricketter in the world ever?
According to all the info circulating after the last SA-India test it has to be one of the following:
Du Plessis,
Duminy.
Kallis has a great batting record AND has done well as a test bowler as well. So who is the best. One of these two. Bradman was also an astute captain. Kallis a great slip fielder.Kallis has a better record than Sobers.To me its out of these two. Bradman 40 runs more on average - does that make up for the wickets Kallis has taken?
Ahhhh but Beeno
The very beeeeg question is
If Bradman was scrutinised and referred as many times as the modern day greats like Kallis or Tendulkar, would he have the same stats.
Me don't think so.
LBW
Stumpings
Catches in the field
Runouts
Nicks - Caught Behind
Any Hotspot referral - Gloves etc
4's
6's
Include that in a large portion of Bradman's career, as Kallis and Tendulkar had to endure, and he would never have got the average he did.
No doubt, close to the best player ever, if not the best, but we are not, and never can, compare apples with apples.
Do you guys know who is the only cricketer to ever score 48 runs in an over?
Yes, in those days the over consisted of 8 balls.
8 balls x 6 sixes = 48 runs in one over.
That in my opinion was one of the best cricketers of my time. Not because he scored 48 runs in one over but for all his other cricket performamces.
The answer is:
GARY SOBERS.
Now do you guys know who is the only bowler to take 19 wickets in a Test?
The answer is:
Jim Laker playing for the MCC in the fifties.
This was in a Test match for the guys who don't know or have never heard or read about English MCC teams.
It is very unfair to select any player as the best of all time as times and the game have developed.
But I know that many Saffers regard F du Plessis and Dummy as the best flops in SA colours.
Jacques Henry Kallis without a doubt....not only has he carried a team but his presence is not something that comes around often.
I know people punt bradman but in playing in those times was totally different than today so one cannot really compare players from era's. seeing that there is a whole science in trying to work batsman out ext I am not sure bradman would have had such a massive impact in todays game.
Don Bradman's batting statistics are freakish not just for cricket but for any sportsman in any sport. This from Wikipedia:
World sport context
Wisden hailed Bradman as, "the greatest phenomenon in the history of cricket, indeed in the history of all ball games".[2] Statistician Charles Davis analysed the statistics for several prominent sportsmen by comparing the number of standard deviations that they stand above the mean for their sport.[241] The top performers in his selected sports are:[242]
Athlete Sport Statistic Standarddeviations Bradman Cricket Batting average 4.4 Pelé Association football Goals per game 3.7 Ty Cobb Baseball Batting average 3.6 Jack Nicklaus Golf Major titles 3.5 Michael Jordan Basketball Points per game 3.4
The statistics show that "no other athlete dominates an international sport to the extent that Bradman does cricket".[3] In order to post a similarly dominant career statistic as Bradman, a baseball batter would need a career batting average of .392, while a basketball player would need to score an average of 43.0 points per game.[242] The respective records are .366 and 30.1.[242]
Some people reckon Bradman's batting stats are inflated because the bowlers weren't as good as they are today. Well, what about his contemporaries? How come Wally Hammond, Len Hutton, Stan McCabe and George Headley don't have test averages close to 100?
The fact that people are even suggesting alternatives to Don Bradman shows either massive ignorance or else a complete lack of respect for one of the most incredible statistics in any sport.
More from Other
- OtherATP Wimbledon 2026 Draw and Matches to be played10 REPLIES · 355 VIEWS
- OtherATP 250 Eastbourne - ATP 250 Mallorca3 REPLIES · 302 VIEWS
- OtherATP 500 - Halle ATP 500 - London (Queens Park)4 REPLIES · 298 VIEWS
- OtherPunch the monkey is not being bullied, says zoo1 REPLIES · 725 VIEWS
- OtherSIES !!!10 REPLIES · 197 VIEWS
- OtherATP Rankings - 21 June 20265 REPLIES · 4,197 VIEWS