FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Come on then big mouth . . .

Come on then big mouth . . .

Started by Rooinek156 REPLIES4,358 VIEWS· 27 May 2020, 07:35
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 07:35
#1
27 May 2020, 07:35#1

This from Bozo:



Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump....Twitter is completely stifling FREE SPEECH, and I, as President, will not allow it to happen!1:40 AM · May 27, 2020·Twitter for iPhone


Wehe . . . come on then big mouth, show us how you (as president) will not allow Twitter to "stifle free speech".


The link on your Mail-in ballots tweet is still there . . . look . . .



Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump·17hThere is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent. Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed. The Governor of California is sending Ballots to millions of people, anyone.....Get the facts about mail-in ballots


See chump? The link that Twitter put up advising Twitter users to read the real story rather than your complete and utter bullshit is still there.


LMAO!


For those who don't know, Twitter have had enough of Bozo's lies and bullshit and they've now started added tags to Bozo's tweets advising users to fact check before swallowing the garbage that the self-serving liar i s spewing.


I see for all his outrage about being exposed as a liar, Bozo is still using Twitter and still tweeting.


What a sad and pathetic loser!

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 08:22
#2
27 May 2020, 08:22#2

Yep.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. 

Your new friend is anti free speech. Great company .

Keep trucking USSRooi. 

Just remember, in 20 years when you're not here anymore, it's your grandkids that will be fighting for the freedom that you cheered as you watched go down the drain.

What a champ.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 08:27
#3
27 May 2020, 08:27#3

Oh, and here's the reason for the mail voting suspicion.

Oh, I forgot, democracy doesn't factor into your ideal world view.



RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 08:29
#4
27 May 2020, 08:29#4
Plumchum, if you'd like to start a thread about free speech and naughty Twitter being ugly to poor Bozo then please, go ahead and start one.
This thread is about Bozo's boast that he (as president) will not allow Twitter to tag his stupid lies and how much success he's had so far.
Understand?
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 08:33
#6
27 May 2020, 08:33#6

Hey RooiDoos,

If you wanna start a thread that promotes anti free speech then go do it somewhere where I won't see it.

Understand? 

You commie fuck.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 08:33
#7
27 May 2020, 08:33#7

Uh-oh . . . Plumchum is having one of his sanctimonious meltdowns.

I repeat, Plumchum, if you'd like to vent your anger and frustration at naughty Twitter and the naughty mail voters and any of that other stuff you're banging on about, feel free to start a thread about it . . . don't hijack my thread which is about Bozo boasting that he's going to do something that everyone knows he can't . . . and that he's still tweeting away on the very platform that he's snivelling about.

LMAO!

What a loser! (That's Bozo the loser, not Plumchum . . . before Plumchum soils his frilly pink panties. Plumchum is also a loser but I wasn't referring to him).

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 08:41
#8
27 May 2020, 08:41#8

You are actually too bitter and defeated to understand the ramifications of what you're promoting.

Tell me, if Trump and I are losers, what does that make you?

I think it's pretty obvious.

Just look around this board to see people's opinion of you. 

Mostly they're pretty spot on.

I'll make some time to read it aloud for you, I mean, if it's too painful to process the words yourself.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 08:51
#9
27 May 2020, 08:51#9
So there goes another thread . . .  destroyed by a small-minded and brainwashed Trumpanzee who just can't handle anything that might criticize his hero.
Plumchum, I honestly don't give a flying toss what a snivelling little crybaby like you thinks about me. You're welcome to ignore my posts (in fact I'd encourage it) but if you have nothing to add to the actual topic being posted then rather just shut the hell up.
Loser.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 09:12
#10
27 May 2020, 09:12#10

No, thanks.

I'll stay right here. 

In fact, please expect many links and posts on this thread during the course of the day. Very many.

Not only are you promoting anti free speech, you also seem to be wanting to enforce it.

Not a good look, litte commie. 



RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 09:26
#11
27 May 2020, 09:26#11

No, I'm all for free speech. Just wanting to see how far this loud-mouthed braggart gets telling Twitter how to run their platform that he is so dependent on.

I'd repeat the same thing to you about where to voice your concerns about free speech but I've told you twice already and you obviously don't have the basic intelligence to understand what I'm saying . . . so you carry on and take over this thread . . . and then come and lecture me on free speech! 

Pfffffffffhahahaha!

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
27 May 2020, 09:36
#12
27 May 2020, 09:36#12

"Just look around this board to see people's opinion of you"

Does anyone here even have an opinion of this poor guy anymore

This guy is the most disliked poster that I have ever come across, ever

He seems quite proud of this achievement though...…..that is until he is drunk and then proceeds to plead his case to all and sundry by creating a thread about how "Honest" he is.

Even that has been conclusively proven to be a outright lie because of his regular and constant blatant dishonesty on this forum....the latest one just last week

Shame man.... my opinion of the man has not changed.... but maybe my feelings have.... because it is just pity now

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 10:12
#13
27 May 2020, 10:12#13

This thing is SA's ambassador to Denmark. Will you see <Fact Check> beside her posts? No, you won't. 

But never mind. As long as grandad Rooi get his way today, tomorrow doesn't matter.

Shortsighted, foolish and cowardly.

"Zindzi Mandela@ZindziMandela·Jun 14, 2019Will be back for the Msunery here #OnMyTsnCs. Miss all these trembling white cowards, shem. Botha, Potgieter, Thieving Rapist descendants of Van Riebeck, etc: how are you my babies? We shall gesels more Mr Skont and Ms Unus #OurLand"
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 10:49
#14
27 May 2020, 10:49#14
I'm not Twitter you silly little man. If Twitter decide to tag her tweets then that's their call and - if you disagree with them - then go ahead and write them a strongly worded letter about free speech. Okay?
My post was about Bozo's boast that he was not going to allow Twitter to endorse his tweets with an option to get the actual facts. I'd still like to see your hero make good on his bragging because I don't think he will and he's just full of his usual hot air and bluster . . . but you're not prepared to even comment on the issue raised and you're ending this discussion with your petulant and childish behaviour . . . while still trying to lecture me on freedom of speech!
Wake up and smell the putrid stench of your hypocrisy.
Now, does anyone who is not a stupid little child want to discuss Bozo's boast and his claim that he will "not allow" Twitter to add tags and links to people's tweets? That's what this thread set out to discuss before Plumchum (the self-appointed guardian of free speech) decided we weren't allowed to talk about it.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 11:51
#15
27 May 2020, 11:51#15

How is this flying so far above your head?

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 12:20
#16
27 May 2020, 12:20#16
Plumchum, I think there are two things that are flying high above your flat, sloping forehead.
Firstly, the actual topic I raised on this thread. I've explained three times to you what this thread is about but if you haven't twigged yet then you probably won't.
Secondly, Twitter have not deleted anything that Bozo said. They're not censoring him in any way and the original content of what Bozo tweeted is still there for stupid people like you to read. Go see for yourself if you don't believe me. All Twitter have done is to provide their users with a link to the actual facts. It's additional information that does not replace the original stupid stuff that Bozo is saying so no-one's free speech is being stifled.
Now, do you have an opinion on whether Bozo will be able to change Twitter's policies as he claims he'll be able to do . . . because he's the big shot president?
Huh?
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 12:24
#17
27 May 2020, 12:24#17

I'll ask again, how is this flying so very far above your head?

Slow down now, think about, actually think about it, before you reply.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 12:35
#18
27 May 2020, 12:35#18
While Plumchum stamps his little foot and demonstrates what a brainwashed fool he is, the score remains Twitter 1, Bozo 0. 
The "get the facts" link is still there on Bozo's May 26 tweet. Remember, this is the self-important old windbag who boasted that he wouldn't allow this to happen . . . yet it's still there.
LMAO!
SH
sharkbokCaptain23,198 posts
27 May 2020, 12:49
#19
27 May 2020, 12:49#19
The alt-right always struggle to provide respectable sources.
That crappy little video provided by Bum Plum could be anything from a standard work office to actors staging the scene.
It could even be the Republican party. It is certainly not evidence that would stand up in any court. 

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 12:52
#20
27 May 2020, 12:52#20

Come now Sharkbok, surely you've worked it out by now . . . if it's on the internet and it shows the Democrats in a bad light then it must be true . . . and if it criticizes Bozo in any way then it must be fake news.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 13:33
#21
27 May 2020, 13:33#21
Bozo tweeted this about 15 minutes ago (the boldening is my own) . . .

Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrumpRepublicans feel that Social Media Platforms totally silence conservatives voices. We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen. We saw what they attempted to do, and failed, in 2016. We can’t let a more sophisticated version of that....1:11 PM · May 27, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
Wehe! Now where is that egg-faced Trumpanzee buffoon who was blubbering about free speech?
LMAO!
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
27 May 2020, 14:02
#23
27 May 2020, 14:02#23


Jon Levine@LevineJonathanThis person is the “head of site integrity” at Twitter2:39 AM · May 27, 2020·Twitter for iPhone




PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 14:06
#24
27 May 2020, 14:06#24

And still, this continues to be so far above Rooi's station that he digs himself ever deeper into the hole while thinking he's gaining altitude.

No wonder these tech platforms get away with this stuff so easily.




CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
27 May 2020, 14:07
#25
27 May 2020, 14:07#25


BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
27 May 2020, 14:21
#26
27 May 2020, 14:21#26

The censorship of conservative views is well known. 

The tech giants were called before Congress to explain themselves. 

Senators are again calling for action. 

I will try and see if I can find the list of people Zuckerberg appointed to his committee to decide what is allowed and what is not. Not a single Trump supporter. All radical leftists and even a member of the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood. 

Then of course we had the censorship of those calling out the false narrative, stats etc regarding the Wuhan Virus. The very people have been proven to be correct. 

Everyone all over the place is talking about this censorship of mainstream conservative views. 

So what can be done. Break up the tech giants. Remove laws protecting them from legal suits for slander and intentional fake news etc. 

I would also like the globalist media to pay a huge price for the Russian HOAX and their part in the attempted COUP. 

Also stop ballot harvesting and mail in ballots for all and sundry. The fact the cheating demonrats don't want voter ID says it all. 

To get all this done Trump will need another 4 years and the House as well.

DA, poor Redrooi has been exposed as a nasty little commie. Commies like him hate the notion of free speech. What mind he has is completely dominated by his globalist masters and their propaganda. As a consequence he can't see straight and is consumed by the hatred the fake news have pumped into him. 

Ou Redrooi is now far gone and continues to sink. Sad to see. 



RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 14:31
#27
27 May 2020, 14:31#27
Left wing and/or right wing newspapers and publications have been adding their bias and their spin onto news articles for centuries. Why should Twitter be any different? 
I'm not saying Twitter (or Facebook or Instagram or whichever other privately owned social media platform) is left-leaning but if they are then so what? They can lean in whatever direction they want. Who's complaining to Fox News or the Washington Times that they're a right-wing bunch of Trumpanzees? If you don't like that media then don't watch it or don't buy it . . . just as if you don't want to read left wing opinions then don't click on Huffington Post and if you don't like hearing more liberal news broadcasts then don't watch CNN. 
Same with Twitter. If you think they're too liberal or if you think they're being ugly and mean to poor Bozo then go find another social media platform that you do like. Isn't that what free speech is all about? How stupid and short-sighted do you have to be to have a little rant about Twitter on . . . ummm . . . Twitter? 
Is anyone forcing Bozo to post his pathetic lies and childish insults on Twitter? Huh? 
Using Twitter is free. The people who own Twitter have every right to block anyone they feel like blocking, just as the editors of Breitbart or InfoWars can edit out all the sensible stuff and only keep the loony far right crap that their stupid brainwashed Trumpanzees want to read. It's their website or platform. Why is Twitter any different? 
As for all this outrage about mail voting, looks to me like Bozo and the Trumpanzees are very worried that the 2020 American election might actually be decided by . . . Americans!
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 14:47
#28
27 May 2020, 14:47#28

The moment that you realise you're dealing with an unreasonable person who doesn't understand the dangerous implications of the argument that he is making. 


"Left wing and/or right wing newspapers and publications have been adding their bias and their spin onto news articles for centuries. Why should Twitter be any different?"


I stopped reading after this. 

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
27 May 2020, 15:00
#29
27 May 2020, 15:00#29

Ou rooitwit opens his mouth and changes feet. All the tech giants are far left wing and censoring the conservatives. The dumbass thinks nothing of it.

So lets look at Fox who was proved right regarding the Russian Hoax, facts do matter, Hannity or Rachel Madcow - its not only about blatant bias, its about blatant lies versus truth. About censoring truth as the Wuhan Virus debacle showed these globalist propaganda machines were doing.




RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 15:03
#30
27 May 2020, 15:03#30
"All the tech giants are far left wing and censoring the conservatives."
This begs the obvious question . . . if it's true (and I'm not saying it is) but if it is true that all the naughty tech giants are far left wingers, why don't the conservatives start their own right-leaning tech giant company or social media platform?
PS And I'm sorry to say, Baboon-ou, but I don't think your favourite Conservapedia qualifies as a "tech giant". LMAO! 
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 15:15
#31
27 May 2020, 15:15#31

And he keeps digging...

"This begs the obvious question . . . if it's true (and I'm not saying it is) but if it is true that all the naughty tech giants are far left wingers, why don't the conservatives start their own right-leaning tech giant company or social media platform?"

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,198 posts
27 May 2020, 15:24
#32
27 May 2020, 15:24#32
It is very simple. A media publication targets a select audience that will use their product. If they target an audience that is too small or does not exist, then the media publication will cease to exist. The media is funded by advertising, so the ads need to match the audience as well to be effective. 
The reason social media "appear" to be left-wing, is that the world is currently undergoing a shift in ideology. The religious far-right happy clappies are for the most part older generations, that did not have the opportunity to be exposed to all the opinions across the internet. 
They took moral and ideological guidance from the Church and political leaders on traditional media such as TV and radio. 
Religion was a big part of their ideology, and how they make sense of the world.
For them, today's centre is far left wing. 
Social Media and the internet is still stronger in younger generations, and traditional media is used less and less often by younger generations. (Particularly for news of the world). 
The general trend in first world countries - in particular, is that the younger a generation is- the less religious they are. They are also more central to left-wing. (at least by the current stack of ideologies).
Sure, people become more conservative as they get older- but in the US - Democrats of generation X have actually increased their Democratic conviction as they have gotten older. More are converting from Republican to Democrat, than the other way around...
When it gets to Millenium generation and generation Z, the shift of ideology is even more extreme. These generations are more exposed to various sources of media, and with so many sources it is easier to get to the truth than ever before. It is easier to question BS like Trump. 
As I have said many times- in 10 years, the current Republican party would not even be able to get 20% of the votes. Republicans will cease to exist as a party, or they will have to reinvent themselves as conservatives- without the religious dogma. (Which is totally different. It is a smarter audience for one thing). 
It is so easy to see brainwashed Christians. They all spout the same garbage. Trump plays them like a fiddle, as he knows how to get them all emotional with conspiracy theories. (E.g. Globalism). 
For the older generations, it is understandable. They grew up during the cold war, and long before the internet. Then you have a complete praat like Bum Plumb who is younger, but still has the same ideology. The older people will eventually move on to the netherworld, and the ideology of the world will continue to evolve.
Bum Plumb will see his view of the world will be shared by such a small minority that believes the conspiracy theory BS. He will be the outcast of the internet, listening to the same brainwashed garbage as Beeno. Just at that time, there will be less and less of it. Bum Plumb will search from internet board to internet board to find a fix of far-right religious dogma- mostly in vain as by that time being conservative will not mean what it is today. By that time it will just be considered Nazi backward stuff. 
The media needs to represent the viewpoints of the day, and Bum Plum  will just be an excluded minority. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 May 2020, 15:26
#33
27 May 2020, 15:26#33

Rooi,

You need to understand a few things...

1) A small political shift on a global platform with billions of users, has an effect which is orders of magnitude beyond what you think . The interactive nature of these platforms only compounds the problem.

2) It does not matter if it's the left silencing the right or the right silencing the left, it will have dire consequences. Saying that both sides should silence each other, shows that you don't have a fundamental understanding of this topic.

And what you also don't seem to understand is that my opinion would be the EXACT same regardless of which side was being stifled.


RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 May 2020, 15:34
#34
27 May 2020, 15:34#34
Plumchum, I don't mind you re-quoting everything I say to give it more exposure, but I'm struggling to see the point of it. . . . especially as it makes you burst into tears.
Edit: I posted that before you subsequent reply and now I'm a bit confused . . . why are you saying on the one hand that you're not reading the things I post and then on the other hand saying I'm not understanding things? How do you know what I'm understanding or not? Were you lying when you said you stopped reading?

Hmmm?
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
28 May 2020, 08:25
#35
28 May 2020, 08:25#35

"Were you lying when you said you stopped reading?"

U h-oh, looks like Plumchum has scampered away from this question almost as fast as Cowardunce ran away from the "Noble Committee" question on this thread.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
28 May 2020, 08:39
#36
28 May 2020, 08:39#36

Nah, USSRooi. Was the end of my workday and I have better things to do than argue with you in the evening.

I said I stopped reading that post after your blunder. I  had clearly not stopped reading the thread, or the rest of your posts, despite my better judgement.

Do feel free to highlight where I'd said I was not reading any more of your posts on this thread.

And besides, your preceding posts had already made it abundantly clear how little you understand about this topic.

Will those explanations suffice?

Anyhoos, I'm back now. Shall I continue exposing your commie ways?


.........Oooooooooooops

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
28 May 2020, 08:41
#37
28 May 2020, 08:41#37

"Nah, USSRooi. Was the end of my workday and I have better things to do than argue with you in the evening."

Yes, you're a touch more entertaining than work, when you're not being petulant.


PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
28 May 2020, 08:49
#38
28 May 2020, 08:49#38

Also, allow me to reiterate the following...


1) A small political (Edit add:bias) shift on a global platform with billions of users, has an effect which is orders of magnitude beyond what you think . The interactive nature of these platforms only compounds the problem.

2) It does not matter if it's the left silencing the right or the right silencing the left, it will have dire consequences. Saying that both sides should silence each other, shows that you don't have a fundamental understanding of this topic.

...which you also didn't address. 

Point (1) above is ridiculously beyond your scope. I'll venture a guess that you have no idea how deep that rabbit hole goes. 

Just give me a quick summary as to what you understand from that statement?

Or run...and demand that we talk about Trump instead.

But before you do that, understand that the above is directly in the middle of the argument Trump is making. So by avoiding it, you're also avoiding the actual issue here.

Your move...commie.

See? There's plenty of life in this thread. 



RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
28 May 2020, 08:51
#39
28 May 2020, 08:51#39
Look, we both know you read what I posted - guys like you and DumbAss and Cowardunce can't help yourselves - but even if we do entertain your little fantasy, how can you tell the other guys he doesn't understand things if you didn't read what he wrote?
It's not a trick question. Be a big boy and answer it. You're effectively telling me you didn't read what I said but . . . ummm . . . I'm wrong! 
How do you know I'm not clearing up all your confusion in the bits you didn't read? Huh Plumchum?
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
28 May 2020, 08:55
#40
28 May 2020, 08:55#40

"Look, we both know you read what I posted"

No, we do not both know that.

You think you know and I know that I didn't. 



↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 4)

More from Mikes Gripes