A brief history of climate change
As to whether man is causing climate change, the data is inconclusive. However, this does not mean that the climate is not changing- and because of man
In the context of the Ozone layer fiasco, it seems prudent to be cautious so that irreversible damage is not caused for future generations. There is no harm in being over cautious until there is conclusive proof to either side of the argument.
Scientists Viewpoints
https://climate.nasa.gov/
...The question is what part of this world have humans not impacted on,,..,we've only been around for less than 1% the life of the earth - does'nt take long to fk things up
What is certain is these twits have a huge agenda (A global redistribution of wealth via a global tax as one stepping stone to the globalist NWO) and really no bais for their ludicrous claims which change like the winds,
In short you have to be a very gullible prize JACKASS to uncritically take in such absurdities. Truly the globalist MSM which pedals this BS is a huge enemy of the people.
A good example of what huge liars these globalist scumbags are takje Al Gore as a prime example:
NINE YEARS AGO THIS MONTH—Al Gore predicted the North Polar Ice Cap would be completely ice free in five years.Gore made the prediction to a German audience in 2008. He told them that “the entire North ‘polarized’ cap will disappear in 5 years.”
“Five Years”
This wasn’t the only time Gore made his ice-free prediction. Gore’s been predicting this since 2007.
According to Al Gore the North Pole should be completely melted by now.
Junk scientist Al Gore also made the same prediction in 2009.
From the video:
Former Vice President Al Gore references computer modeling to suggest that the north polar ice cap may lose virtually all of its ice within the next seven years. “Some of the models suggest that there is a 75 percent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years,” says Gore.
In January 2006, Al Gore posited “within the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return” and “a true planetary emergency” due to global warming.
Of course, this turned out to be nothing more than complete lunacy.
At least 8 Dire Predictions from the movie never happened – not even close.
This week the continental US is suffering through another deep freeze.
How gullible and fast asleep do you have to be to believe these clowns!
What thinking people say!
Al Gore has made millions scaring people to death over the years. Time to be exposed as the fraud he is!
Yes, and Hollywood gave him the same award they gave to rapist Roman Polansk, and child predator Woody Allen. He’s in good company.
Remember this every time the celebrities and the elite try to sell you this garbage. If global warming was truly the threat they believed it was, then they would have given up their private planes, yachts, and multiple mansions years ago.
So if we didn't die from net neutrality, or the tax cuts, global warming will kill us. We don't stand a chance! Goodbye friends, it's been nice! Hahahahahahahaha
Had two of these idiots at my house for Christmas, they were clueless. They could only manage naming it, had no idea who NOOA was or how data had been gathered/ formulated. Low info. SEEMS LIKE YOUR TYPICAL Fast asleep gullible person sucking on the globalist MSM teat!
Libturds say the science is settled, they broke the very first rule of science..politics #1.
HERE IS ONE VERY VERY ASTUTE MAN WHO DIDNT SWALLOW THIS GLOBALIST bs:
Hah-Hah! POTUS Trump Trolls Global Warming Zealots as Record Freezing Temps Grip US
The United States is gripped in a freeze as record chill temps ravage parts of the country.
President Trump trolled global warming zealots Thursday on Twitter and celebrated the fact that we aren’t paying trillions of dollars to fight the hoax.
Please president Trump, keep tweeting!
Trump tweeted Thursday, “In the East, it could be the COLDEST New Year’s Eve on record. Perhaps we could use a little bit of that good old Global Warming that our Country, but not other countries, was going to pay TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS to protect against. Bundle up!”
NOW NOTE THIS OAKS"
President Trump has accurately called Climate Change a hoax. Climate Change is a global redistribution of wealth based on junk science. The U.S. should NEVER have to answer to foreign bureaucrats; we are a sovereign nation.(AND THE GLOBALIST JUST HATE SOVEREIGN NATIONS!)
Trump kept a campaign promise when he pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord which would have robbed Americans of wealth and freedom.
The US is getting blasted with record freezing temps. Forecasters are saying we may see record freezing temps in the Northeast for New Years Eve. We sure could use some of that global warming!
News of the freeze dominated headlines on the Drudge Report.
Thinking people say:
Of the many things that President Trump has done, getting us OUT of the outright theft of American dollars, called the Paris treaty, surely is one of the greatest. That alone has a profound impact on America. Trillions of dollars that would have gone to who knows who, that stays HERE. It is hard to overstate the critical importance of this one promise he made, that he kept.
God bless President Trump, and continue to watch over him and keep him and his family safe.
AMEN AND AMEN BROTHER!!!
I wish the American people could sue Al Gore for some of the mega millions he has pilfered from this hoax.
Really, that's the prime example of extreme wealth redistribution right there. All along, his estate uses more electricity than the town I live in.(never mind about his plane)
bwahaahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahaha
You could not have picked a more polar opposite of Barack H. Obama if you tried. Every day feels like Christmas with President Trump in charge.
God bless and protect you, Mr. Trump. Best President ever!
It is true, Doc! Every day, I can hardly believe we have a President who loves America -- first! In so many ways. It's just amazing. I look forward every day to new surprises, new positives for America.
Manmade Global warming ,or the Lefts new spin, "Climate Change", IS a Hoax ..It's another way to create a "Globalist" enviornment, and re-distribute income from prosperous people to begger states in true Marxist fashion..
Well my aching sid es cant take too much more of this hilarity.
Man one has to marvel at how brain washed and sheeplike some people are. They suck up anything the globalists throw at them. Ou rooitwit particularly is simply an echo of whatever they globalists say.
But credit has to go to President Trump:
"This guy is a political giant! He shows more knowledge and intestinal fortitude than any one ever! The courage to tell the left just how stupid they are is so heartening! Reagan was a giant also, but this guy has jumped into first place" !
In this time of alcohol-fuelled indolence, late nights, late breakfasts, and “oh God, do I really have to go back to work already?” I think it’s important that we remind ourselves who our enemies are and whom we must destroy utterly in 2018.
For me, there is one candidate that stands out above all the others, not because it’s the most physically dangerous or the most savagely cruel or the most monstrously evil, but simply because it is the most ubiquitous and insidiously vile and repellant.
I’m talking, of course, about the Green Blob.
Over the last year, I’ve written quite a bit about how the entire global warming industry is basically a junk-science-fuelled scam and the biggest financial and scientific scandal in the history of the world.
Some of you may think I’m exaggerating. So in order to stiffen up your sinews, summon up your blood, and gird your loins for the fight in 2018, let me parse for you a recent newspaper editorial which sums up pretty much everything that is wrong with this scam.
OAKS GO TO THIS WEB PAGE FORT REST OF ARTICLE.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/28/reasons-global-warming-green-blob-must-die-2018/
HERE IS THE REST OF THE ARETICLE:
It comes from my favorite financial magazine — Moneyweek — and is a summary of an editorial which appeared in the Financial Times.
Read the paragraph, if you can stomach it, then I’ll explain why it drove me to apoplexy when I read it in the bath over Christmas — and why you should be just as annoyed and disgusted as I am:
One promising sign from this year’s One Planet summit near Paris was a pledge by 225 financial institutions – including eight of the world’s top asset managers, pension funds, insurers and sovereign wealth funds – to start holding the world’s worst-emitting companies to account. This will see them “pressure companies to cut greenhouse gas emissions and improve disclosure and oversight of climate-related threats”. Climate change poses three types of business risk. If governments get serious about enforcing commitments made under the Paris Treaty they will be forced to toe the line. If governments do nothing, the resulting “cataclysmic events” that could ensue are going to have hard-to-measure effects on their bottom lines. Finally, if advances in green technology happen “faster than imagined” it will be “disastrous” for firms that fail to keep up. For both activists and shareholders, “this is an exercise in transparency and peer pressure that will have long-term consequences.”
This is a reference to an initiative called Climate Action 100+ in which 225 financial institutions — among them names like Rockefeller Asset Management, Schroders, Skandia and Deutsche Asset Management — vow to police the companies in which they invest for environmental correctness:
We believe that engaging and working with the companies in which we invest – to communicate the need for greater disclosure around climate change risk and company strategies aligned with the Paris Agreement – is consistent with our fiduciary duty and will contribute to achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement.
If this sounds like so much harmless corporate and social responsibility guff let me tell you the scary part: these people currently have $26.3 trillion in assets under management. That is equivalent in value to just over one-third of the entire current global economy.
And that doesn’t even include the world’s biggest asset manager BlackRock — with a further $6 trillion in assets under management — which has also taken it upon itself the role of the financial world’s Eco Stasi.
As Bloomberg reported this month:
The firm, which oversees almost $6 trillion in assets, sent letters from its corporate-governance team to about 120 companies this week, urging them to report climate dangers in line with the recommendations of the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, set up by Bank of England Governor Mark Carney.
The letters were sent globally to BlackRock holdings with “material climate risk inherent in their business operations,” such as those in the energy, transportation and industrial sectors, according to a copy seen by Bloomberg. They were signed by Michelle Edkins, the firm’s global head of investment stewardship.
The Financial Times — house journal of Davos Man, the EU technocrat elite, crony capitalist corporations and embittered Remoaners — seems to think this is all a jolly good thing.
Let me explain, with reference to that editorial (above), why it’s not:
…to start holding the world’s worst-emitting companies to account.
What are these companies emitting, exactly? Toxic waste? Poisonous fumes? Distilled essence of industrial effluvia and metastasizing cancer? Nope. The regulations on pollution — in the West, at least — are rightly stringent. But what these “worst-emitting” companies are emitting is nothing more deadly than the harmless trace gas which helps plants to grow: carbon dioxide.
Improve disclosure and oversight of climate-related threats
What climate-related threats? There is no credible evidence whatsoever of catastrophic or unprecedented climate change caused by human carbon dioxide emissions. The only threat so far is a fantastical one which exists only in activist scientists’ discredited computer models, which are increasingly divergent from observed real-world temperatures.
If governments get serious about enforcing commitments made under the Paris Treaty they will be forced to toe the line.
That’s an awfully big “if.” In fact, what we’re seeing is the precise opposite. From Germany’s disastrous Energiewende to Spain’s abandonment of renewable subsidies to Trump’s pulling out of the Paris Accord, the tendency across the world is for countries to renege on the CO2 reduction targets, not to enforce them.
If governments do nothing, the resulting “cataclysmic events” that could ensue are going to have hard-to-measure effects on their bottom lines.
The journalist who typed the words “cataclysmic events” might just as realistically typed in “unicorns” or “alien invasion.” There is simply no credible evidence that climate change poses any significant threat to business.
Finally, if advances in green technology happen “faster than imagined” it will be “disastrous” for firms that fail to keep up.
Yes. That’s how free markets work. It’s called “creative destruction”: businesses that make the wrong calls fail, while those that get it right thrive, create more jobs, and generate value for both customers and shareholders. But again, that whole sentence hangs on a very big “if.” It would make just as much sense — actually much more sense — if it said the exact opposite, viz: “if advances in green technology happen ‘more slowly than imagined’ then it will be ‘disastrous’ for firms that have embraced them to the exclusion of more reliable fossil-fuel technologies.” That’s why the business of business is best left to business, without meddling interventions either by governments or green activists who have wormed their way into fund management companies and are putting politics before the interests of their clients.
Let me repeat: climate change is the biggest scientific scam in the history of the world. But, even worse than that, it is the biggest financial scam.
The people pushing this scam — and that includes everyone from the reinsurance companies bigging up the climate threat in order to get extra business to the corporate interests snouting at the renewables industry subsidy trough to the investment fund managers talking all this nonsense about “material climate risk” — do not deserve their inflated salaries and certainly should be allowed nowhere near your job or your hard-earned money.
Some of them are incompetents, some of them are go-along-to-get-alongs, some of them are stupid, some of them are brutal cynics, and some of them so crooked they deserve to be behind bars.
While you and I work hard producing stuff that people want or need (I’m giving ourselves the benefit of the doubt here), everyone on the climate change gravy train is simply feeding parasitically off our labor.
If they were leeching from our blood like vampires, that would be bad enough. But it’s actually worse than that: they are erecting unnecessary obstacles which make it harder for our businesses to make a profit or even survive, while simultaneously making our cost of living more expensive and funneling our money into the pockets of horrible people who don’t deserve a penny of it.
Do you remember why it was that people on your side of the pond voted Trump and people on my side voted Brexit?
I do.
It was because it was maybe our last chance, our only chance, of overthrowing an entrenched liberal elite which cared nothing for the lives or aspirations of ordinary people, a liberal elite which simply abused its position to feather its own nest.
Well the people most benefiting from the climate scam are the embodiment of that liberal elite. Just like those banks that were too big to fail, just like those clever Collateralized Debt Obligation packages which they used to bury toxic debt ever deeper into the financial system knowing that in the end it would be ordinary Joes who would have to pay, the climate industrial complex is just another manifestation of the liberal elite’s Enron-style shakedown of the “little people” like you and me.
When we complain that the markets are rigged, we’re right. They are rigged. They are rigged so blatantly that it’s quite amazing that the financiers who engage in such skullduggery and manipulation haven’t been locked up. But because it’s all being done in the name of combating climate change and with government support, dishonest — indeed, probably illegal behavior — has been sanctioned and not just made legit but actually promoted at the highest level.
At least at was being promoted at the highest level until Donald Trump came along.
The Green Blob is the very essence of the swamp he promised to drain.
It must be destroyed in 2018 — and destroyed utterly.
The globalist agenda is being unmasked. the G loablsit MSM cannot control the narrative any longer. Than k God for this great mercy.
Worth noting:
In a speech given to the US Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works on July 28, 2003, entitled "The Science of Climate Change",[14] Senator James Inhofe(Republican, for Oklahoma) concluded by asking the following question: "With all of the hysteria, all of the fear, all of the phony science, could it be that man-made global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people?" He further stated, "some parts of the IPCC process resembled a Soviet-style trial, in which the facts are predetermined, and ideological purity trumps technical and scientific rigor."[15] Inhofe has suggested that supporters of the Kyoto Protocol such as Jacques Chirac are aiming at global governance.[16]
William M. Gray said in 2006 that global warming became a political cause because of the lack of any other enemy following the end of the Cold War. He went on to say that its purpose was to exercise political influence, to try to introduce world government, and to control people, adding, "I have a demonic view on this."[3] The TV documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle was made by Martin Durkin, who called global warming "a multi-billion-dollar worldwide industry, created by fanatically anti-industrial environmentalists." In the Washington Times in 2007 he said that his film would change history, and predicted that "in five years the idea that the greenhouse effect is the main reason behind global warming will be seen as total bunk."[18]
Climate change has also been called the "greatest scam in history" by John Coleman, who co-founded the Weather Channel.[19] When questioned by the IPCC regarding his claims, he responded "The polar ice is increasing, not melting away. Polar Bears are increasing in number."[19]
In 2012, Donald Trump claimed that "The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive." [20]
In 2015, The Spectator published an article describing the "climate change agenda" as a "conspiracy against the poor."[21]


