FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  A fly on Michael Clarke

A fly on Michael Clarke

Started by Mozart1 REPLIES100 VIEWS· 05 Mar 2014, 18:30
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
05 Mar 2014, 18:30
#1
05 Mar 2014, 18:30#1

As Clarke gave his speech, a fly circled his head in graceful swoops. This was one of those luminous moments in sports.....one thinks of the appearance of the rainbow when Davis Love finally won his major after years of choking. The national bird of Australia made it all the way to Newlands. But the question remains, what's the attraction for these proud insects....the Continent or the Australians?

 

But even if there were no flies on the Proteas they were thoroughly outplayed through much of the series. It started with a mistake when Smith waved a white flag and decided to field. Not the only captain's mistake he made in the series. But the fact is the Aussies were better man for man almost all the way through. Would anybody but de Villiers and perhaps Amla have made a composite team?

 

Mostly though I'm left with the old impression that the Aussies just had to win and for us a win would have been nice. Johnson was hostile every ball....the physically just as imposing Morkel drifted in and out. Nothing underlined the attitude differences more than those two quicks.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
06 Mar 2014, 13:49
#2
06 Mar 2014, 13:49#2

With the loss of Kallis and now Smith, it looks like the start of the SA slide, as we don't have players to replace these two.

 

 

The side has two class bats in Amla and AB and 3 class bowlers in Steyn, Morkel and Philander.......sadly all these guys are the wrong side of 30. JP blows hot and cold, Faf is a fighter, Alviro is not test standard and old, Elgar looks a little short on real class.

 

 

Of the youngsters coming through only de Kock looks to have the raw material 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news